nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/1ffcf36c48d77dda DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240408s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/1ffcf36c48d77dda doi eng 342 23 Mauritz, Franziska Katharina Author aut To Define Is Just to Define - Illegal content according to Article 3 lit. h DSA and the conflict of laws Mauritz, Franziska Katharina Verfassungsblog 2024-04-08 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Social media allows users to share content worldwide. This also enables users to distribute illegal content. The laws of the EU Member States vary greatly when it comes to what content they consider to be illegal, especially regarding hate speech. Thus, it is important which national law applies in cross-border cases concerning online content. Ultimately, this question is closely linked to the broader reshuffling of power in the digital sphere: will it be actual ‘law’ that platforms enforce online or norms made by platforms themselves? So far, the law of 27 Member States plus the EU itself remains utterly chaotic compared to the more uniform Terms of Service (ToS) of the internet giants. CC BY-SA 4.0 DSA Internet Platforms Social Media content moderation (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Internet Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/to-define-is-just-to-define/ raw object