nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/aa5d559e0991208b DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240317s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/aa5d559e0991208b doi eng 342 23 Foster, Caroline E. Author aut Tort Law and New Zealand’s Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions - The New Zealand Supreme Court‘s 2024 Climate Change Decision in Smith v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd and others   Foster, Caroline E. Verfassungsblog 2024-03-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In February 2024, the New Zealand Supreme Court overturned the previous strike outs in the case of Michael John Smith in tort against seven major New Zealand companies in the dairy, energy, steel, mining and infrastructure sectors. Smith asserts that the respondents are engaging in conduct that affects him and others, and has put them into legal connection with one another in ways that enable appropriate remedy. This is heartland common law territory.  Even though the climate change problems we are now grappling with may be new ones, the centuries-old practices and traditions of the common law are a part of New Zealand’s constitutional heritage and structure.  Litigation is a legitimate vehicle for members of the population to engage the law in the face of harm or threats to individuals’ rights and well-being. CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Crisis Klima Tort law climate change climate litigation (DE-588)4031170-3 gnd Klima Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/tort-law-and-new-zealands-corporate-greenhouse-gas-emissions/ raw object