<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/1feab81754e023cf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/towards-qualified-majority-voting-in-eu-foreign-policy/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Towards Qualified Majority Voting in EU Foreign Policy</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Goldmann, Matthias</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Alemanno, Alberto</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-08-19</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CFSP</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Hungary</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Israel</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Sanctions</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Unanimity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>voting</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>For several years, the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) appeared to have a Hungary problem. More fundamentally, however, it has a Treaty-design problem. Article 31(1) TEU establishes unanimity as the default decision-making rule for the European Council and the Council in CFSP matters, subject to specified exceptions. We argue that the standard justifications for unanimity do not outweigh its structural costs and that the existing Treaties leave more room for qualified majority vote than current practice suggests.</dc:description>
</dc>
