<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/0bc2c9cceefe2540</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/triumph-in-romania/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>A Troubling Triumph in Romania - What the Annulled Election Reveals About Democracy’s Defence</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Maftean, Miles R.</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-12-10</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Disinformation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Militant Democracy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rumänien</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Russia</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>TikTok</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>elections</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>romania</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rumänien</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The annulment of Romania’s presidential election results by its Constitutional Court is, at first glance, a triumph for democracy. By nullifying the first round – narrowly won by far-right candidate Calin Georgescu amid allegations of Russian-backed interference – the Court sent a clear message: electoral integrity is not up for debate. But is this really a victory? In truth, this decision reflects a troubling pattern in how democracies respond to crises: after the fact. The annulment is not so much a defence of democracy as a stark reminder of the limits of judicial power.</dc:description>
</dc>
