<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20210224-154115-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/twitters-modi-operandi/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Twitter’s Modi Operandi - Lessons from India on Social Media’s Challenges in Reconciling Terms of Service, National Law and Human Rights Law</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Mahapatra, Sangeeta</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fertmann, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kettemann, Matthias C.</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2021-02-24</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Censorship</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>content moderation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Free Speech</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>India</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Twitter</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>India is not only the world’s largest democracy, it also accounts for the largest number of internet shutdowns and take down requests to social media companies globally. The recent stand-off between Twitter and the Government of India (GoI) over suspending more than a thousand accounts supportive of farmers’ protests ended with Twitter falling in line with the GoI’s demands. This may set a dangerous precedent for digital platforms enabling other democratic governments to stifle online dissent.</dc:description>
</dc>
