nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/b03abe8470fbb4a0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241104s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/b03abe8470fbb4a0 doi eng 342 23 Di Franco, Eleonora Author aut Two Courts, Two Visions - Implications of the Right to a Fair Trial for EU Accession to the ECHR Di Franco, Eleonora Verfassungsblog 2024-11-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The diverging standards of protection concerning the right to a fair trial, as interpreted by the CJEU and the ECtHR, remain a critical obstacle to the EU’s renewed attempt at accession to the ECHR. In this field, the two Courts seem to be drifting further apart rather than converging, leading to unresolved conflicts between the standard of fundamental rights protection and mutual trust obligations in the EU. Except in the unlikely event of a course-correction by the CJEU, this means that we are no closer to accession today than we were ten years ago, when the now-infamous Opinion 2/13 was handed down. CC BY-SA 4.0 Article 47 EU Charter CJEU Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union ECHR ECJ ECtHR EGMR EU EU EU Charta EU Charter Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Grundrechte Human Rights Rule of Law Völkerrecht (DE-588)4619834-9 gnd Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union (DE-588)10290611-7 gnd EU (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/two-courts-two-visions/ raw object