nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/3c97e3a019d187e2 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250424s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/3c97e3a019d187e2 doi eng 342 23 Gupta, Sarthak Author aut Back to Binary Basics - The UK Supreme Court Cuts Across Both Parliamentary Intent and Human Rights in For Woman Scotland Gupta, Sarthak Verfassungsblog 2025-04-24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On April 16 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its decision on a fundamental question regarding the interpretation of the terms “sex” and “woman” under the Equality Act. The Court unanimously held that, under the Equaliy Act, the meaning of the word “woman” must be restricted to “biological” women, and does not include trans women, even those who have legally changed their gender under the Gender Recognition Act. The decision risks undermining the UK’s equality law framework and marks a troubling regression in gender rights. CC BY-SA 4.0 Equality Act 2010 Gender Großbritannien. Supreme Court | London-Westminster Legal Gender Recognition Trans rights Transgender UK Supreme Court gender and sex discrimination legal gender transgender rights (DE-588)7756591-5 gnd Equality Act 2010 (DE-588)1043862161 gnd Großbritannien. Supreme Court | London-Westminster (DE-588)7619945-9 gnd Transgender Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/uk-supreme-court-trans-women/ raw object