<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/747db0e254257024</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/ukranian-reformist-zeal/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Pathologies of the Reformist Zeal - The Venice Commission Tempers the Eagerness of the Ukrainian Judiciary Reform</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Nekoliak, Andrii</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-10-23</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Judiciary Reform</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ukraine</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ukraine</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Venice Commission</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ukraine</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On 14 October 2025, the Venice Commission issued an Opinion No. 1247/2025 concerning the anticipated changes to Ukrainian judiciary legislation. The Opinion criticizes the proposed judiciary reform for being disproportionate or even erratic experimentation. Indeed, Ukraine’s judiciary reformers never rest – but perhaps that’s the problem. This blog post argues that a more measured, constructive path forward to proceed with the judiciary reform is now essential.</dc:description>
</dc>
