<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/21d4bc1b142e58c9</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/unsc-resolution-2817/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Condemning the Counterstrike Without the Cause - The Security Council’s 12 March Resolution and the Incoherence of Partial Ius Ad Bellum Adjudication</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Southey, Safia</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-03-17</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>International Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Iran</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Security Council</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Security Council Resolution</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>US-Iran-War</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>US–Israeli War on Iran</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>United Nations</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Vereinte Nationen. Sicherheitsrat | New York NY</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Völkerrecht</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Völkerrecht</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Vereinte Nationen. Sicherheitsrat | New York NY</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On 12 March 2026, the United Nations Security Council adopted a resolution condemning Iran’s retaliatory strikes against Gulf states and Jordan, declaring them a “breach of international law and a serious threat to international peace and security.” While the resolution is silent on the ongoing US-Israeli bombing campaign, the larger problem is structural. Under the ius ad bellum framework the resolution purports to apply, the lawfulness of a use of force cannot be assessed in isolation from the use of force that preceded it.</dc:description>
</dc>
