nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/21d4bc1b142e58c9 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260317s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/21d4bc1b142e58c9 doi eng 342 23 Southey, Safia Author aut Condemning the Counterstrike Without the Cause - The Security Council’s 12 March Resolution and the Incoherence of Partial Ius Ad Bellum Adjudication Southey, Safia Verfassungsblog 2026-03-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 12 March 2026, the United Nations Security Council adopted a resolution condemning Iran’s retaliatory strikes against Gulf states and Jordan, declaring them a “breach of international law and a serious threat to international peace and security.” While the resolution is silent on the ongoing US-Israeli bombing campaign, the larger problem is structural. Under the ius ad bellum framework the resolution purports to apply, the lawfulness of a use of force cannot be assessed in isolation from the use of force that preceded it. CC BY-SA 4.0 International Law Iran Security Council Security Council Resolution US-Iran-War US–Israeli War on Iran United Nations Vereinte Nationen. Sicherheitsrat | New York NY Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd Völkerrecht (DE-588)1001797-5 gnd Vereinte Nationen. Sicherheitsrat | New York NY Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/unsc-resolution-2817/ raw object