<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/089986e7cd09bbc5</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/verfassungsblog-doaj-scholarly-standards/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Access Denied - Verfassungsblog, DOAJ, and the Meaning of “Scholarly”</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Dalkilic, Evin</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-06-13</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>DOAJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Diamond OA</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Diamond OA funding</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Open Access</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>bibliodiversity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Open Access</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In January 2025, we were notified that Verfassungsblog had been removed from the DOAJ, our subsequent appeal was rejected. We want to take this as an opportunity and initiate a debate about standards, formats, and diversity of the Diamond OA publishing community. As a first step, DOAJ has kindly permitted us to publish our appeal as well as their appeals decision so that our community and partners are able to follow the respective reasonings.</dc:description>
</dc>
