<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/9a95a1f7c9cbb23e</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/vetbills-eucharter/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Vet Bills and the EU Charter - Is Your Dog Insured? </dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Herlin-Karnell, Ester</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-07-11</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU Charta</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>animal rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>animal welfare</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>health care</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Over the past decade, concerns about rising veterinary costs and their impact on animal welfare have sparked growing debate across Europe and North America. In the EU, veterinary pricing is largely unregulated, leading to significant variation in costs and transparency across Member States – prompting scrutiny from competition authorities in countries like the UK, the Netherlands, and Sweden. If Charter rights, particularly Article 37 on sustainability, are to carry real weight in relation to animals, the current state of the veterinary market in Europe warrants closer examination.</dc:description>
</dc>
