With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility - Why W.S. et al and Hamoudi vs Frontex Mark a Turning Point Ziebritzki, Catharina Author aut Text xx# 2026 Verfassungsblog 2026-01-04 ger
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 The Court of Justice’s judgments in W.S. et al and Hamoudi mark an important shift in accountability at Europe’s borders. The Court made clear that Frontex cannot evade judicial responsibility for fundamental rights violations. The rulings lower evidentiary hurdles for victims of deportations and pushbacks and underscore that remedies against EU agencies must work in practice. Taken together, the cases push back against Frontex’s long-standing structural irresponsibility and reaffirm the rule of law in EU asylum governance. CC BY-SA 4.0 Ziebritzki, Catharina EU Charta Frontex Migration Governance pushbacks Rule of Law 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/w-s-et-al-and-hamoudi-vs-frontex/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/4f765e8aaada43ff 260104 10.59704/4f765e8aaada43ff Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)