nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/2a3fea0a4d5379bd DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240211s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/2a3fea0a4d5379bd doi eng 342 23 Bowring, Bill Author aut What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution Bowring, Bill Verfassungsblog 2024-02-11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only possible as a result of Russia’s membership of the Council of Europe and ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). But that chapter in Russia’s constitutional history has been closed. CC BY-SA 4.0 ECHR Russian Constitutional Court Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd Russland Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/what-went-wrong-and-what-could-be-done/ raw object