<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/4adc61a19deaacd8</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/when-judges-fall-silent/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>When Judges Fall Silent - Why Neutrality is a Goal, Not a Given</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Dörr, Carolin</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-02-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Neutrality is the buzzword of our time. It dominates debates about rainbow flags in members’ offices of the Bundestag, Germany’s federal parliament, or judges who wear a headscarf. The desire for a neutral state – and neutral judges in particular – is entirely understandable and perfectly legitimate. The principle of neutrality is meant to prevent bias and partiality and thus ensure equal treatment for all. And yet, according to a recent survey, by 2025 only just over half of respondents in Germany still believed that courts treat everyone equally. So, what is going wrong?</dc:description>
</dc>
