nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20230418-204502-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 230418s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20230418-204502-0 doi eng 342 23 Olaiz-Gonzalez, Jaime Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-5723-8947 Whispers of Change (Vol. II) - Mexico’s Ongoing Debate on the Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Amendments Intensifies Olaiz-Gonzalez, Jaime Verfassungsblog 2023-04-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions on the case of García Rodríguez y Alpízar Ortíz v. México (both have recently decided cases concerning virtually the same set of facts with notoriously varying outcomes), the discussion heats as it now relates to one of the most relevant inquiries of modern constitutional study: judicial review of constitutional provisions and amendments. CC BY-SA 4.0 Constitutional Change Inter-American Court of Human Rights Inter-American Human Rights System Judicial Review Mexican Supreme Court Preventive Detention Torres-Checa, Daniel Author aut Incháustegui, Sebastián Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/ raw object