<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20220922-230613-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Whispers of Change - On Mexico’s Supreme Court Ongoing Debate on the Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Amendments</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Olaiz-Gonzalez, Jaime</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Torres-Checa, Daniel</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Incháustegui, Sebastián</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2022-09-22</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Change</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Review</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Mexican Supreme Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Pretrial Detention</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Procedural Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Until recently, a debate on Mexico’s Supreme Court's power to scrutinize the constitutionality of constitutional provisions seemed largely distant. But for the first time in its history, the Supreme Court discussed a draft opinion of one of its members calling for the inapplicability of Article 19 of the Mexican Constitution, which provides the so-called mandatory preventive imprisonment as an automatic measure when investigating specific felonies. With the future of Mexican constitutionalism pending from this decision, the stakes are as high as they have ever been.</dc:description>
</dc>
