nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/fb65e8e747132955 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240426s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/fb65e8e747132955 doi eng 342 23 Hohnerlein, Jakob Author aut Who is afraid of actio popularis? - On Separating Rights and Remedies in the ECtHR’s Climate Judgment Hohnerlein, Jakob Verfassungsblog 2024-04-26 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier If, as the German experience suggests, the actio popularis exclusion serves to bar individuals from invoking objective illegality that does not concern rights, while standing of associations is a way to enforce objective legality despite the actio popularis exclusion, it is hard to see why this should have any relevance for the European Convention of Human Rights. Human rights are, after all, rights. CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Crisis KlimaSeniorinnen Remedies Subjective Rights Subjektives Recht climate litigation (DE-588)4058321-1 gnd Subjektives Recht Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/who-is-afraid-of-actio-popularis/ raw object