<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/fd7c3586690df4c3</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/whom-is-citizenship-for/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Whom Is Citizenship For? - In Defense of a Militant Rule of Law Mechanism</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Bossow, Anja</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-05-16</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Birthright Citizenship</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Donald Trump</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Dual State Theory</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Executive Order</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>rule of law backsliding</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>United States</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On Thursday, May 15, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in “the birthright citizenship case.” Instead of deciding on the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order (EO) banning birthright citizenship for certain classes of individuals, the Court is asked to decide whether lower courts exceeded their authority in placing a nation-wide injunction on the government’s order. But this doesn't make the decision any less significant.</dc:description>
</dc>
