nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/fd7c3586690df4c3 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250516s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/fd7c3586690df4c3 doi eng 342 23 Bossow, Anja Author aut Whom Is Citizenship For? - In Defense of a Militant Rule of Law Mechanism Bossow, Anja Verfassungsblog 2025-05-16 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On Thursday, May 15, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in “the birthright citizenship case.” Instead of deciding on the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order (EO) banning birthright citizenship for certain classes of individuals, the Court is asked to decide whether lower courts exceeded their authority in placing a nation-wide injunction on the government’s order. But this doesn't make the decision any less significant. CC BY-SA 4.0 Birthright Citizenship Donald Trump Dual State Theory Executive Order rule of law backsliding United States Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/whom-is-citizenship-for/ raw object