nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/4d7ebd01a97d0fdf DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240617s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/4d7ebd01a97d0fdf doi eng 342 23 Dastoli, Pier Virgilio Author aut Why an EU Country under the Surveillance Procedure (Article 7.1 TEU) Should not Chair the Council Presidency Dastoli, Pier Virgilio Verfassungsblog 2024-06-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In accordance with the Council Decision on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, from July 1 of this year the office is to be held by Hungary. This occasion will mark the first time that the Presidency will have been held by a Member State that has been subject to the “surveillance” procedure in Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, having been launched by the European Parliament in September 2018. It would now be both prudent and sensible for the Council to delay the Hungarian Presidency to such a time when the Article 7(1) TEU surveillance procedure will have been successfully concluded. Such a postponement should not be considered as a sanction against Hungary, but rather a simple precautionary measure to preserve the smooth functioning of the European Union. CC BY-SA 4.0 European Council Hungary De Capitani, Emilio Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/why-an-eu-country-under-the-surveillance-procedure-article-7-1-teu-should-not-chair-the-council-presidency/ raw object