nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/79991772098d56b6 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240211s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/79991772098d56b6 doi eng 342 23 McIntyre, Juliette Author aut Why Nicaragua’s Article 62 Intervention in South Africa v. Israel is Potentially Unhelpful McIntyre, Juliette Verfassungsblog 2024-02-11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 23 January 2024, Nicaragua applied for permission to intervene in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel). Nicaragua's application will drag proceedings out one way or another. Potentially it means the Court must hear and decide upon a third version of events, clouding South Africa’s original case. If this case is really about addressing what the Court described as a ‘human tragedy’ in Gaza and not just about political point-scoring, Nicaragua, by trying to help, may just have made things worse. CC BY-SA 4.0 Genocide ICJ ICJ Statute Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag (DE-588)36344-3 gnd Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/why-nicaraguas-article-62-intervention-in-south-africa-v-israel-is-potentially-unhelpful/ raw object