Neu › Ergebnisse des Justiz-Projekts

Search
Generic filters

Supported by:

+++ Neuerscheinung › „Verwundbarkeit und Resilienz der dritten Gewalt“ – Ergebnisse des Justiz-Projekts +++

09 August 2022

Paths Untaken

If the development of certain technologies, such as advanced, unaligned AI, would be as dangerous as some have suggested, a long-termist legal perspective might advocate a strategy of technological delay—or even restraint—to avoid a default outcome of catastrophe. To many, restraint–a decision to withhold indefinitely from the development, or at least deployment, of the technology–might look implausible. However, history offers a surprising array of cases where strategically promising technologies were delayed, abandoned, or left unbuilt, even though many at the time perceived their development as inevitable. Continue reading >>
0
09 August 2022
,

Is Legal Longtermism Common Sense?

The past decade has seen a growing interest in protecting future generations from risks associated with climate change, pandemics, artificial intelligence, and other potential threats. Philosophical theories have developed in parallel, and those associated with the view that one should be particularly concerned with ensuring that the long-run future goes well have been referred to as longtermism. In the context of law, these theories form the basis for legal longtermism, the set of views associated with the claim that law and legal institutions ought to protect the far future. Based on a pair of recent empirical studies we show that legal experts and laypeople alike believe that the law should protect the long-term future much more than it currently does; that legal experts believe that the law can predictably and feasibly protect the long-term future; and that these beliefs hold true across major demographic subgroups. Continue reading >>
1

Verfassungsblog is a global forum of scholarly debate at the interface of academy and society. We open up debates in public law – internationally, interdisciplinary and open access.

Help Secure Our Future for 2026

We make expert legal analysis freely accessible – when democracy needs it most.
3,600 authors. 9,500 articles. Nearly five million views last year.

Independent. Open Access. Reader-funded.
Now we need your help to keep it that way.

380000
285534

Goal 2: 380,000 € by April 2026

Go to Top