Jürgen Kühling

Missbrauchsunabhängige Entflechtung – verfassungswidriger Kartellrechtspopulismus oder sinnvolle Ultima Ratio?

Nach Veröffentlichung ministerieller Pläne zu möglichen Gesetzesänderungen kommt es häufig vor, dass sich Rechtswissenschaftler*innen rasch mit konträren Positionen zu Wort melden. Wenn die Vorschläge zwei Rechtsgebiete betreffen, umso mehr. Seltener ist es, dass die Rechtswissenschaflter*innen mit einer einschlägigen Spezialisierung streiten und die mit einer anderen Spezialisierung schweigen. Diese Situation ergab sich jetzt im Juni 2022. Was war geschehen? Continue reading >>

Anna Leisner-Egensperger

Tanz um das geborene Kind

Wie erwartet hat der Bundestag die Streichung des strafrechtlichen Werbeverbots für den Schwangerschaftsabbruch beschlossen. Rechtlich interessant ist jetzt, wie es nach der Streichung des § 219a StGB mit dem Recht des Schwangerschaftsabbruchs weitergeht. Denn dass inzwischen nicht nur gegenüber der Opposition, sondern auch innerhalb der Koalition die Fronten verhärtet sind, hat die erste Lesung im aktuellen Gesetzgebungsverfahren gezeigt. Continue reading >>

Frank Meyer

Russian Elites, Proxies, and Oligarchs – Make them Pay!

Russland und seine starken Männer sollen buchstäblich für die Kriegsschäden in der Ukraine zahlen. Die Kommission schlägt vor, die Durchsetzung von Sanktionen mit unionsweit einheitlichen Strafandrohungen zu stärken und auf diesem Weg elegant zugleich einen Rechtsgrund für die Einziehung involvierter Vermögenswerte zu schaffen. Diesem Vorhaben stehen ungeachtet seiner politischen Opportunität erhebliche sanktionstechnische, unionsrechtliche und vor allem strafrechtliche Bedenken entgegen, die erhebliche Zweifel an Zulässigkeit und Erfolgsaussichten nähren. Continue reading >>

Timo Zandstra, Evelien Brouwer

Fundamental Rights at the Digital Border

We are witnessing the emergence of the EU’s ‘digital border’: an ecosystem of interoperable databases to expand the surveillance and control of the movement of third-country nationals. In this blog post, we discuss one of the latest additions to this ecosystem - the European Travel Information and Authorisation System, or ETIAS in short - and argue that the system as it is currently set up violates the right to data protection laid down in Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, especially in light of the CJEU’s PNR judgment earlier this week. In many ways, we consider ETIAS to be a test case for a much wider roll-out of such often AI-powered technologies in the field of border control. Continue reading >>

Jens Kersten

Wir müssen alle unser Leben ändern

Rezipiert die Rechtswissenschaft aktuell vor allem psychologische Begriffe und Konzepte? Und wenn ja: Warum ist das so? Und wohin soll das führen? Continue reading >>

Christian Thönnes

A Directive altered beyond recognition

On 21 June 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union rendered its decision in the preliminary ruling procedure on the fate of the PNR Directive. The Court had a chance to decisively answer one of the most crucial questions facing European security law: Is indiscriminate mass data retention for and the technology-induced analysis of ordinary human behavior compatible with fundamental rights? It instead opted for an enigmatic compromise creating a whole host of new questions. It does not change the fact that the PNR Directive survives – as a strange beast altered beyond recognition. Continue reading >>

Rachel Griffin

Tackling Discrimination in Targeted Advertising

On 21 June Meta and the US Department for Housing and Urban Development released a legal settlement that will restrict Meta’s ability to offer those clients some of its core ad-targeting products. It resolves (for now) a long-running case over discriminatory targeting of housing adverts. Meta is now prohibited from using certain targeting tools in this context, and has promised new tools to ensure more representative targeting. This US lawsuit should be a wake-up call for European regulators, reminding them that taking systemic discrimination seriously requires proactive regulatory reform and enforcement. The relevant provisions of the Digital Services Act (DSA) are largely symbolic. Continue reading >>

Laurent Pech

Covering Up and Rewarding the Destruction of the Rule of Law One Milestone at a Time

Once upon a time, when still a candidate for President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen solemnly declared: “there can be no compromise when it comes to respecting the Rule of Law. There never will be.” As it is now clear, this was just Orwellian doublespeak. Continue reading >>

Michael Henry Yusingco

How the Philippines Could Overcome Its Deep Mistrust of Constitutional Reform

The Philippines has had three constitutions. Despite numerous attempts, the 1987 Constitution has not been amended since its ratification. Initiatives to change a constitution, and moves of resistance, are part and parcel of a constitutional democracy. Actually, the Philippines finds itself in a fortunate position, because the failure of past attempts at amending the 1987 Constitution can offer valuable lessons. Continue reading >>

Anindita Mukherjee

The Rule of Law in a Reign of Terror

India is witnessing a spate of housing demolition used as a tool to inflict extrajudicial punishment for dissent. Over the past few months, the bulldozer has emerged as a powerful metaphor for the brute force of the state and the endless machinations of Hindu supremacists to flatten any difference or diversity they encounter. Tempting as it is, to think of the recent demolitions as a shocking new development, in fact the bulldozer has always been a significant determinant of the contours of space in India. Continue reading >>

Viktor Z. Kazai

The Role of Referenda in Orban’s Regime

Following the parliamentary elections and the national referendum in April 2022, the OSCE found that the legal framework was inadequate for the conduct of a democratic plebiscite. Even though the observers noted several shortcomings of the legal regulation and documented many serious anomalies of the electoral system, they failed to put their analysis in a broader political and legal context. The aim of this short piece is to briefly describe the role that the referenda play in Orbán’s regime. Continue reading >>