31 October 2018
Rumours made in Germany: Wie das Auswärtige Amt das Menschenrecht der Auswanderungsfreiheit kriminalisiert
Das Recht zur Ausreise und Auswanderung stellt ein allgemein anerkanntes Menschenrecht dar. Das dürfte auch im Auswärtigen Amt bekannt sein. Stattdessen aber finanziert das Ministerium eine geschmacklos bebilderte Anzeigenkampagne, in der es heißt: „SAY NO TO ILLEGAL EMIGRATION“. Auf diese Weise werden Migrationswillige gezielt desinformiert und wird die Ausübung eines Menschenrechts kriminalisiert. Continue reading >>
5 
What Being Left Behind by the Rule of Law Feels Like, Part II
By now it must be clear to all that the Hungarian and Polish governments do have a plan that is built on staying within the Union, and changing it from the inside, (ab)using its institutions, resources and weaknesses to their own benefit. Every round and every step where European institutions falter in preventing moves to this effect is an opportunity for the offending member states to pursue their strategies even further. Continue reading >>
0
Guilty of Homelessness – The Resurgence of Penal Populism in Hungary
In Hungary, “residing in public spaces as habitual dwelling” constitutes a petty offence punishable by community service work or confinement. Even though the constitution had been amended to provide a basis for that, it is not inconceivable that the criminalization of being homeless is found unconstitutional. Continue reading >>
0
30 October 2018
Iudex calculat: Why Constitutional Scholars Should Surmount their Allergy to Numbers
Law students often mention poor math scores as a reason to elect their course of study. Refugees of a world increasingly dominated by numbers and number-crunchers, jurists often wear the adage “iudex non calculat” as a badge of honour. Surmounting the discipline’s allergy to numbers could do some good not just to constitutional judges but also to the scholarship that concerns itself with the discussion of the constitutional texts they are supposed to apply but also with the decisions they churn out. Continue reading >>
0
Toleranz ja! Aber gegenüber wem? Der österreichische Blasphemiestraftatbestand vor dem EGMR
Das am 25.10.2018 veröffentlichte Urteil des EGMR in E.S./Österreich (Beschwerde Nr. 38450/12) hat für erhebliches Aufsehen und einige Aufregung und Kritik gesorgt – zu Recht. Die ganz auf den konkreten Sachverhalt fokussierte Entscheidung interessiert vor allem für das, was sie nicht oder nur am Rande behandelt: die Kriminalisierung blasphemischer Äußerungen durch Bestimmungen wie § 188 StGB. Continue reading >>
0
29 October 2018
What Being Left Behind by the Rule of Law Feels Like, Part I
On October 25, 2018 Central European University (CEU) made international news again. President and Rector Michael Ignatieff announced that CEU is moving to Vienna, unless the Hungarian government makes progress by December 1, 2018 on the international agreement it is meant to sign with the State of New York under Hungarian law. In the last few hours many readers of this blog, friends and colleagues, took to asking how I felt about this. Disappointed, frustrated – but most of all: betrayed. Continue reading >>
0
27 October 2018
The Italian Budget Drama – Brussels and Rome on Collision Course
The EU Commission has, for the first time, rejected a budget plan of a member state. While the Italian government drums its chest and the markets get increasingly nervous, the situation remains deadly serious. It is moreover deeply symptomatic of the potential, limits and fundamental shortcomings of the current architecture of Eurozone fiscal governance. Continue reading >>Lesbische Eltern! Warum das Kindeswohl keinen Aufschub mehr verträgt
Lesbische Frauen können in Deutschland seit mehr als einem Jahr eine Ehe schließen. Im Recht der Eltern-Kind-Zuordnung werden sie aber immer noch nicht gleichbehandelt. Das will ein Gesetzentwurf von B90/DIE GRÜNEN ändern. In der Bundestagsdebatte verwiesen zahlreiche Abgeordnete auf bestehende Prüfungserfordernisse. Die Prüfungen sind aber längst erfolgt. Die rechtliche Gleichstellung lesbischer Co-Mütter darf nicht weiter vertagt werden. Continue reading >>26 October 2018
Though this be Madness, yet there’s Method in’t: Pitting the Polish Constitutional Tribunal against the Luxembourg Court
At the beginning of October 2018, Poland’s Prosecutor General submitted a request to the Constitutional Tribunal to examine the compliance of Article 267 TFEU with the Polish Constitution, so far as it allows the referral of preliminary questions regarding the organization of the national judiciary. Despite the relatively easy identification of motives underlying the application, there is need for analysis and evaluation of the contents of the application as well as the argumentation used as justification for this task, not least because there is a lot at stake. Continue reading >>Slovenia’s Supreme Court rejects the European Court of Human Rights
On Wednesday 24th of October the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia made a striking, indeed unprecedented, announcement. After a rather uncontroversial and routine ruling by the ECtHR, the Supreme Court has declared – in a mere press release and without any justification – that it respects only the rulings of the Strasbourg Court that it finds persuasive. In so doing, Slovenia hints at joining the regimes of Russia and Turkey. Continue reading >>Expanding the Franchise – another Sleight of Hand by the Hungarian Government?
The Hungarian government plans to expand the right to vote in the upcoming European elections to Hungarians living outside the EU. Is the aim of this plan simply to comply with EU law? Or is this another part in the long history of Fidesz trying to manipulate the franchise in their favour? Continue reading >>25 October 2018
On the Brink of Joining Poland and Hungary: The Night of Surprises in the Slovak Parliament
The relatively short political history of the Slovak parliament has already witnessed several dramatic sessions. The latest drama unfolded during the night of 23 October in a parliamentary session to discuss and vote on an amendment of the Constitution and a new Act on the Constitutional Court that could have put Slovakia on a direct path to follow Hungary and Poland. The night turned out to be full of surprises. Continue reading >>What does a Bolsonaro Presidency mean for Brazilian Law? Part 2: the Reforms and the Court
Jair Bolsonaro, an extreme right-wing former army officer who has spent the last 20 years as a representative in Congress, is at this point likely to be the next president of Brazil. But what are the implications for Brazilian law in case of Bolsoaro's victory? Part 2 looks at the probable scenarios before Brazil's Supreme Court if any of the reforms are challenged. Continue reading >>
0
24 October 2018
Eine stille Föderalismusreform III: die Ausweitung der Bundeskompetenzen für Investitionshilfen
Die erste große Reform der bundesstaatlichen Strukturen in Deutschland in diesem Jahrtausend ist zwölf Jahre her, die zweite neun. Jetzt wird die bundesstaatliche Ordnung erneut auf grundlegende Weise umgestaltet. Doch für den großen Zentralisierungsschub, der damit einhergeht, scheint sich die Öffentlichkeit kaum zu interessieren. Continue reading >>What does a Bolsonaro Presidency mean for Brazilian Law? Part 1: Reforms from the Far Right
Jair Bolsonaro, an extreme right-wing former army officer who has spent the last 20 years as a representative in Congress, is at this point likely to be the next president of Brazil. But what are the implications for Brazilian law in case of Bolsoaro's victory? Part 1 outlines which of the policies he has proposed so far are most likely to be enacted. Continue reading >>23 October 2018
Constitutional Pluralism between Normative Theory and Empirical Fact
It has been recently floated in legal academia and the blogosphere that it is high time for constitutional pluralism to bow out of the European scene. The reason? It has been alleged to be (1) “fundamentally flawed and unsustainable” for allowing the application of EU law to be selective and unequal and (2) prone to abuse by autocrats, as demonstrated by the ongoing dismantling of democracy and the rule of law in Hungary and Poland where national (“constitutional”) identity is invoked all too often to justify patently illiberal policies. Is constitutional pluralism really to blame? What is this beast anyway? Continue reading >>22 October 2018
Interim Revolutions
With the Order against Poland to suspend its "judicial reform", the European Court of Justice has entered a terra incognita, forcing a sovereign Member State to choose between its membership to the club of European integration, or to walk away and follow the path of authoritarian illiberalism. To do this in an Order of interim measures, is quite a gamble on the part of the Luxembourg court. However, the stakes are so high that the Court was left with hardly any other choices. Continue reading >>VB vom Blatt: Zehn Gedanken zum „Hooligan“-Urteil des EGMR
Präventiver Polizeigewahrsam gegen gewaltbereite Fußballfans verstößt nach einem Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte (EGMR) nicht gegen Menschenrechte. Gedanken von Thomas Feltes, Professor für Kriminologie und Polizeiwissenschaft, zu dem heutigen Grundsatzurteil. Continue reading >>New Cuban Constitution: Towards a System Without a Single Leader
Ten years after the retirement and subsequent death of Fidel Castro, Cuba is going through an extensive constitutional reform process to transform the political system. Whereas the previous system was designed to be headed by a single leader, the future constitutional setup will distribute power among several people. Continue reading >>
0
Indian Democracy at a Crossroads
The Indian Supreme Court's ruling on LGBTQ rights signals a court willing to play an unabashedly partisan role in the ongoing battle over the idea of India. The Indian Supreme Court, however, remains a complicated, polyvocal, court, and cannot be attributed any coherent ideological or jurisprudential worldview. This, at a time when the defining role of inclusive pluralism to India’s constitutional identity is at stake and majoritarian nationalism is waging a spirited battle, not just for continued political relevance but for reshaping the very idea of India. Continue reading >>
0
20 October 2018
The Bakery as battleground
How should the modern liberal state reconcile the demands of equality and religious belief? It appears that the new battleground is not at the pulpit or the ballot, but at the … bakery. In Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd the UK Supreme Court has delivered an artificial reasoning riddled with conceptual confusion. Continue reading >>
0
19 October 2018
The Dutch Climate Case Judgment: Human Rights Potential and Constitutional Unease
The Dutch climate case has reached a new high. Last week, The Hague Court of Appeal upheld the 2015 verdict which ordered the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2020. The Court did so on the ground that the current actions of the Dutch government to combat climate change are insufficient in the light of the state’s human rights obligations. Has the Court gone too far? Continue reading >>
0
18 October 2018
Poland’s Supreme Administrative Court recognizes Same-sex Parents
Poland is one step closer to the full legal recognition of birth certificates that include same-sex parents. In a landmark court ruling of 10 October 2018, the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw (SAC) found that registry offices in Poland cannot refuse the registration of foreign birth certificates of children based on the sexual orientation of their parents. Continue reading >>Macht gibt Macht, Recht muss sie wieder nehmen: Minister und Abgeordnete im Wahlkampf
Nach der Wahl ist vor der Wahl und so ist schon wieder Wahlkampf, diesmal in Vorbereitung auf die Landtagswahl in Hessen. Dabei muss der Staat politisch neutral sein – Parteien dürfen und sollen für sich werben und miteinander streiten, Minister aber, Fraktionen und Abgeordnete müssen sich zurückhalten, denn sie verfügen über staatliche Mittel, die ihnen im politischen Wettbewerb einen Vorteil verschaffen können. Das Recht muss hier wirksame Anreize setzen, sich nach den Regeln der politischen Chancengleichheit zu verhalten. Continue reading >>
0
17 October 2018
Will Poland, With Its Own Constitution Ablaze, Now Set Fire to EU Law?
The Polish justice minister and Prosecutor-General Zbigniew Ziobro has asked the Constitutional Court to declare Art. 267 TFEU unconstitutional "to the extent that it allows referring to the Court [of Justice] a preliminary question … in matters pertaining to the design, shape, and organisation of the judiciary as well as proceedings before the judicial organs of a member state". If the Court adopts Ziobro's arguments, that will have drastic implications for the integrity of EU law. Continue reading >>„Mythos Interpol” und sein Missbrauch durch autoritäre Regime
Das Verschwinden des Interpol-Präsidenten Meng Hongwei lenkt den Blick auf ein Problem, das Interpol schon seit seinen Anfängen begleitet: ihre strukturelle Anfälligkeit, von autoritären und totalitären Regimen zur weltweiten Verfolgung unliebsamer politischer Gegner missbraucht zu werden. Vor allem Russland und die Türkei machen von diesem Mittel umfangreich Gebrauch - und weder die deutschen Sicherheitsbehörden noch die Bundesregierung scheinen sich für diesen Missbrauch ausreichend zu interessieren. Immerhin wächst neuerdings der internationale Druck auf Interpol. Continue reading >>14 October 2018
Strafrecht als Kommunikationsform in der demokratischen Gesellschaft – ein Blick in das neue Buch von Thomas Fischer
Thomas Fischer, pensionierter Vorsitzender Richter am BGH, Autor des wichtigsten Standardkommentars zum StGB, scharfsichtiger Kolumnist und streitbarer Jurist, hat vorige Woche ein neues Buch vorgelegt: „Über das Strafen. Recht und Sicherheit in der demokratischen Gesellschaft“. Es ist eine nachdenkliche, sensible Schrift, die zeigt, welche gesellschaftspolitische Kraft ein sachliches Diskutieren über Strafe und Strafbedürfnisse entfalten kann. Alle, die am Verfassungsrecht interessiert sind, sollten es lesen. Continue reading >>
0
13 October 2018
Some Thoughts on Facultative and Obligatory Mixity after Singapore and COTIF, and before CETA
The conclusion of agreements as ‘mixed’, that is jointly by the European Union and its Member States, is a legal phenomenon peculiar to the EU legal order. Notwithstanding the almost complete silence of the Treaties on the point, mixity quickly became common practice for the Union and was, in most instances, readily accepted by its contractual partners. That does not mean, however, that mixity has not given rise, to date, to lengthy and often heated debates within, between and before the EU institutions. Continue reading >>
0