02 August 2018
The CJEU Has Spoken Out, But the Show Must Go On
In a nutshell, I argue that despite several conceptual problems in CJEU’s understanding of judicial independence, it showed a healthy dose of judicial statesmanship in Celmer. As neither the preliminary reference procedure nor the fundamental right to the fair trial are good “vehicles” for addressing the Polish structural judicial reforms, there is a limit what the CJEU could do. The foundations of judicial independence are political and thus the real constitutional moment will be the combo of the next Polish parliamentary and presidential elections. Continue reading >>
0 
Von Schleusen, Wehren und ihren Wärtern: Zur mündlichen Verhandlung des EuGH in der Rechtssache Weiss u.a.
Verstößt das Programm der Europäischen Zentralbank zum Ankauf von Wertpapieren des öffentlichen Sektors gegen das Verbot der monetären Haushaltsfinanzierung nach Art. 123 AEUV? Handelt sie damit gar außerhalb ihres währungspolitischen Mandats? Diese und weitere Fragen hatte der Europäische Gerichtshof am 10. Juli 2018 in der mündlichen Verhandlung in der Rechtssache Weiss u.a. (C-493/17) zu klären. Continue reading >>01 August 2018
Neues vom Glossator (16): In zerstreuter Verfassung
Über Konzentration und Zerstreuung, Urkunde und Schrift, Lerche und Isensee. Continue reading >>Wachgeküsst: Der französische Verfassungsrat aktiviert erstmals die Fraternité – im Ausländerrecht
Am 6. Juli 2018 entschied der französische Verfassungsrat, dass die Regelungen über die Strafbarkeit von Menschen, die Ausländer ohne Rechtsstatus unterstützen, zum Teil verfassungswidrig sind. Dabei bezog sich der Verfassungsrat erstmals auf den Verfassungsgrundsatz der Brüderlichkeit. Was sagt eigentlich die deutsche Verfassung über Brüderlichkeit bzw. über Solidarität im Ausländerstrafrecht (§§ 95, 96 Aufenthaltsgesetz)? Continue reading >>31 July 2018
Vertrauen hat Grenzen: Die Schlussanträge zu Ibrahim u.a. und Jawo
Seit 25. Juli liegen die Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts Wathelet in den Rechtssachen Ibrahim u.a. und Jawo vor. Sie übertragen die bisherige EuGH-Rechtsprechung zu den zielstaatsbezogenen Grenzen von Dublin-Überstellungen auf weitere Konstellationen und enthalten eine spannende Weiterentwicklung des europäischen Flüchtlingsschutzes. Continue reading >>
0
Shifting towards a democratic-authoritarian state: Israel’s new Nation-State Law
The 'Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People' was passed by the Knesset on July 19, 2018. The Basic Law purports to entrench the identity of the state as a Jewish state. As this Article is being written several petitions against the Basic Law are being prepared and will be submitted to the Supreme Court. The Court however may find it very difficult to declare the Basic Law void. Continue reading >>
0
30 July 2018
Drawing Red Lines With No (Significant) Bite – Why an Individual Test Is Not Appropriate in the LM Case
It can be argued that the individual assessment required by the Aranyosi judgment is not the proper test in the LM case due to three reasons. Firstly, regular control reverses the logic of the mutual trust developed by the CJEU. Secondly, there is a substantial difference between fundamental rights and the independence of judiciary. Infringements of the latter require other legal mechanisms of protection. Thirdly, the Polish institutional changes affecting judicial independence may influence all 26 EU acts providing for mutual recognition of judgments. A broader perspective should be taken. Continue reading >>
0
29 July 2018
The CJEU in the Celmer case: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back for Upholding the Rule of Law Within the EU
Surrender cases are litmus tests for the EU’s approach towards the enforcement of the rule of law in the Member States. Without judicial independence and other elements of the rule of law concept, EU law will cease to be operational, whether in the context of the single market or outside of it. Aranyosi and LM are the beginning of a long journey. In a more general sense, these cases demonstrate that ultimately – as in all incomplete constitutional systems – it is the courts which play a crucial role in carving out and applying rule of law and fundamental rights exceptions. Continue reading >>
0
28 July 2018
Rule of Law Retail and Rule of Law Wholesale: The ECJ’s (Alarming) “Celmer” Decision
A craving for the rule of law can be satisfied in two ways. You can invoke it legally through a case-by-case checking of its presence in any particular instance (though of course, retail assessment means you’re at the mercy of the court near you) or you can better guarantee a steady and plentiful delivery by contracting wholesale, thus providing a legal constraint on the supplier’s ability to deviate. This week’s decision of the European Court of Justice in the “Celmer” case (Case C-216/18 PPU, Minister for Justice and Equality v LM) tells us that the rule of law is now available retail in the European Union, but it is not now – and probably can never be – available wholesale. Continue reading >>
0
How to Assess the Independence of Member State Courts?
Immediately after it was published, the judgment in Case C‑216/18 PPU Minister for Justice and Equality v. LM generated many varied assessments in Poland. Some commentators treated the judgment as a general vote of no confidence against the Polish judiciary whilst others (including the Minister of Justice) found it to be a defeat of the Irish court. The judgment is used as an argument in current political disputes. Leaving aside, however, the aforementioned determinants, it is to be concluded that because of its approach to certain significant issues, the judgment does not yield to an unequivocal interpretation, and its actual consequences are still hard to anticipate. Continue reading >>
0
Individuals and Judges in Defense of the Rule of Law
In many ways, this case illustrates EU constitutionalism at its best: despite not being obliged to do so, the Irish judge made a request under Article 267 TFEU, bringing together concerns raised by the pending Article 7 TEU procedure and the more technical and narrow issue of fair trial under Article 47 EU Charter. While the ECJ follows the path opened in Aranyosi for assessing the ‘real risk of breach’ under Article 47 EU Charter, in interpreting that provision it manages to weave in the wider Article 7 TEU contextual concerns as well, thereby considerably strengthening the constitutional status of the right to a fair trial. Continue reading >>
0
Standpunktlosigkeit ist keine Option
Der Tonfall der politischen Debatten ist schärfer geworden und zwar gerade, was das Recht und besonders was das Flüchtlingsrecht betrifft. Das Recht und vor allem die Verfassung angesichts dieser Polarisierung als Grundlage sachlicher Debatten hochzuhalten, ist richtig. Falsch ist es zu meinen, rechtliche Analyse komme ohne einen Standpunkt aus. Wir brauchen ein Bewusstsein über das Menschliche in jedem Urteilen, damit wir zur Kritik unserer eigenen Sichtweise fähig und uns der Verantwortung des Urteilens bewusst sind. Continue reading >>27 July 2018
We Still Haven’t Found What We’re Looking For
The diagnosis is grim. So, the CJEU should have done something! If the political class is reluctant, the law in the hands of the CJEU must be put to play. The conventional narrative has it that this has always been the case. This was the gist of the hope laid in the anticipated LM case. The CJEU has not lived up to those high expectations. This is not a landmark ruling and neither will its impact be of seismic constitutional proportions. The reason for that is, as we shall see, not the reluctance of the CJEU to address the problem seriously, but a plain fact that the expectations have been simply too high. While this is, most likely, as good as it can judicially get, the LM decision has still not brought us what we have been looking for. Nevertheless, we might be at least an inch closer toward that goal. Continue reading >>
0
A new chapter in Israel’s “constitution”: Israel as the Nation State of the Jewish People
In the very last day of the Knesset’s summer session, on July 19th 2018, the Israeli Knesset passed a new Basic Law stating that Israel is the Nation State of the Jewish people. Supporters of this Basic Law claim that it simply states the obvious: Israel was established as a refuge and a homeland for the Jewish people. Still, the Basic Law is very problematic. Not because of what is included within it, but mainly for what is missing from it: the idea of a democratic state and the principle of equality. Continue reading >>26 July 2018
Afraid of Their Own Courage? Some Preliminary Reflections on LM
The much-awaited judgment in the case LM (also known as Celmer) is a landmark decision. The European Court of Justice acknowledged for the very first time that the essence of the right to a fair trial prohibits, under certain circumstances, the surrender of individuals from one EU Member State to another. Against the backdrop of the rule of law crisis in Poland and elsewhere, this acknowledgment is certain to be seen as a big step towards strengthening the rule of law in Europe. At the same time, the decision falls short of the expectations of those who wanted the Court of Justice to assess the independence of the Polish judiciary in substance. Continue reading >>25 July 2018
Freiheitsentziehung in der Freiheitsentziehung? Die BVerfGE-Entscheidung zur Fixierung in der öffentlich-rechtlichen Unterbringung
Kann es eine Freiheitsentziehung in der Freiheitsentziehung geben? Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat diese Frage in seiner Entscheidung zur Fixierung von Patienten in der öffentlich-rechtlichen Unterbringung eindeutig bejaht. Daraus folgt ein zwingender Richtervorbehalt für Fixierungen. Dies überzeugt im Ergebnis, die Begründung aber ist hemdsärmelig und schränkt die Landesgesetzgeber unnötig ein. Continue reading >>24 July 2018
„Do not go. Do not vote“: an Interview with WOJCIECH SADURSKI
The Polish President Andrzej Duda has announced a referendum about the reform of the Polish Constitution of 1997. According to Wojciech Sadurski, the questions he intends to ask the Polish people are either meaningless, redundant or downright detrimental - with one important exception. Continue reading >>23 July 2018
Sandu and Others v Russia and Moldova: The High Costs of Occupation
On 17 July 2018, the European Court on Human Rights reminded again that occupation of foreign lands and support of separatist regimes is a costly affair. This cost is not only calculated in terms of monetary repercussions but also in terms of reputational losses. On that day the chamber of the Court delivered a judgment in the case of Sandu and Others v Russia and Moldova. This judgment is a new one in the line of cases dealing with a breakaway region of Moldova – the self-proclaimed Republic of Transnistria. Continue reading >>
0
Fast Random-Access Memory (Laws) – The June 2018 Amendments to the Polish “Holocaust Law”
On June 27th Polish authorities broke the national record in speed of proceeding a bill in Parliament and getting it signed into the law by the President. And we are not talking about just an ordinary bill. The statute in question is the (in)famous Polish “Holocaust bill” or “Polish death camp law”. Continue reading >>
0
Neues vom Glossator (15): Fußnoten verfassen
So, wie Unterscheidungen etwas spalten, sind Fußnoten auch Teile eines gespaltenen Textes. Sie arbeiten an der Normativität mit. Ich mache das als Glossator, also an einem beispielhaften Text. Continue reading >>
0
20 July 2018
Are National Governments Liable if They Miss Their Relocation Quota of Refugees?
Last week, the Spanish Supreme Court declared that between 2015 and 2017 the Government of Spain had failed to relocate 19.449 refugees from Greece and Italy. The Court considered in its Judgement of 9th July of 2018 that Spain was bound by two Council Decisions of May and September 2015 establishing an EU Emergency Relocation Mechanism aimed at distributing some of the refugees that arrived at their coasts during the so-called ‘refugee crisis’. The relocation mechanism included a table with the number of refugees Member States were obliged to accommodate in their own international protection systems (‘quota’). Continue reading >>
0
The Curious Case of Article 299 of the Turkish Penal Code: Insulting the Turkish President
Judgments by the Strasbourg Court are binding on Turkey and furthermore are the primary source for interpreting the European Convention of Human Rights, a treaty to which Turkey is party and which, according to Article 90 of the Turkish Constitution, prevails over national laws such as Article 299 of the Turkish Penal Code on insulting the President, in the event of conflict. ECtHR jurisprudence clearly indicates such a conflict between Article 299 and the Convention. But are Turkish courts aware of this? Continue reading >>19 July 2018
Gegenleistung für einen „gesamtgesellschaftlichen Vorteil“: Das BVerfG-Urteil zum Rundfunkbeitrag
Der Erste Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts hat die Vorschriften über den Rundfunkbeitrag für im wesentlichen verfassungsgemäß erklärt. Lediglich die Höherbelastung von Inhabern von mehr als einer Wohnung sei mit Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar. Die verfassungsrichterliche Wertschätzung für den öffentlichrechtlichen Rundfunk ist im Grundton des Urteils deutlich hörbar, kann aber nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, daß die Argumentation nicht in allen ihren Teilen überzeugt. Continue reading >>18 July 2018
Germany’s Moral Responsibility to Support a Treaty on Business and Human Rights
In a massive conglomeration called the Treaty Alliance, leading human rights NGOs around the world together with many luminary academics are calling for a treaty between states on business and human rights that would seek to prevent human rights violations by businesses from occurring and ensure they do not go unpunished, or at least uncompensated. Such a treaty is necessary given the need to address a number of problems in international law that have prevented victims of human rights violations from being able to gain remedies against errant corporations. Continue reading >>17 July 2018
Der NSU vor dem EGMR: Letzte Hoffnung auf Aufklärung?
Nach dem Urteil im NSU-Prozess haben Nebenkläger*innen und ihre Anwält*innen angekündigt, keinen Schlussstrich ziehen zu wollen. Man sei bereit, bis zum Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (EGMR) zu gehen. Bis dahin ist es noch ein weiter Weg, der zunächst über den BGH und das BVerfG führt. Trotzdem lohnt die Überlegung, wie der EGMR zur Aufklärung des NSU-Komplexes beitragen kann. Continue reading >>The ECtHR and Post-coup Turkey: Losing Ground or Losing Credibility?
Since Turkey’s coup attempt in July 2016, human rights violations have been abundant. With a broken Turkish justice system, the ECtHR has received over 33,000 applications from the country, with 30 to 40 more incoming each week. Shockingly, more than 90% of these applications have been dismissed. This is often on dubious grounds, causing experts and Turkish citizens alike to condemn its response. Continue reading >>
0
16 July 2018
Muss der österreichische Bundespräsident CETA ratifizieren?
„Sie werden sich wundern, was alles gehen wird.“ Dieses Zitat stammt nicht vom amtierenden Bundespräsidenten und ehemaligen Grünen-Politiker Alexander Van der Bellen, sondern seinem damaligen FPÖ-Gegenkandidaten Norbert Hofer. Umso überraschender erscheint es, dass nun Van der Bellen seine verfassungsmäßige Kompetenz aktiver wahrnimmt als seine bisherigen Amtsvorgänger: Er weigert sich vorerst, das CETA-Abkommen zu ratifizieren. Als Begründung nennt er die ausstehende Entscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs (EuGH) hinsichtlich Unionskonformität der darin vorgesehenen „Schiedsgerichte“. Continue reading >>
0