Search
Generic filters
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Alani Golanski

Alani Golanski, a James Kent Scholar at the Columbia University School of Law, is the Director of Appellate Litigation at Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., in New York.
POSTS BY Alani Golanski
20 March 2025

Sliding into Quasi-Fascism?

Many commentators label the second Trump administration authoritarian or right populist, but shun fascist as rhetorical overreach. They are currently correct. Such hesitation, however, is on less sure footing for those who prognosticate that the executive will attempt to construct a regime claiming the right to unchecked, continuing power. Substantial continuation of constitutional and democratic norms, which they assume, is far from guaranteed. I will explain why the Trump presidency already displays characteristics that render reasonably possible its morphing into a regime appropriately characterized as fascist or, at least, quasi-fascist. Continue reading >>
2
29 December 2020

Failing Efforts to Delegitimize the Incoming Biden Administration

When state actors ignore evidence – or in the case of allegations of widespread election fraud, the lack of evidence – toward obtaining some political advantage, the community’s evaluation of the condition of the rule of law comes out badly. Degradation of the rule of law today leaves it in a state of disrepair tomorrow and alleviating harm to the way in which people morally appraise their legal system is not an easy fix. Continue reading >>
0
26 October 2020

Dark Money Subverts the Rule of Law

During the recently completed United States Senate committee hearings for Donald Trump’s nominee for a seat on the Supreme Court, Amy Coney Barrett, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island used his time to try to demonstrate how right-wing groups, including the Federalist Society and Judicial Crisis Network, use dark money to shape the American judiciary. A common reaction, certainly on the part of those continually disadvantaged on the policy side, is that massive dark money investment in the legal system’s actors and outcomes subverts the rule of law. Although ordinary citizens, informed commentators, and political representatives make this claim, theorists have paid scant attention to explaining why this might be so. This omission is likely rooted in the sort of concept theorists think the rule of law is. Continue reading >>
4
Go to Top