Enforcing the Law of Democracy
It was a political bombshell. On Monday, 31 March 2025, Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right party Rassemblement National (National Rally) in France, was convicted of misappropriation of public funds in the so-called “parliamentary assistants” case. The judgment is marked by an unusual degree of judicial creativity, particularly in its underlying conception of democracy, which may be understood through the lens of militant democracy. Although it does not constitute a political judgment in the traditional, partisan sense, its constitutional and symbolic significance is substantial—and the backlash it has provoked against the judiciary is a cause for concern.
Continue reading >>
Dictatorship of the Court vs. Will of the People?
On March 31st, French politician Marine Le Pen was convicted for embe-zzlement of public funds – and sentenced to ineligibility to run for office for five years, effective immediately. Since then, the RN incessantly gathered outrage, calling out the “tyranny of judges” and claiming that the verdict end-angers democracy. After a week, it’s time to take a closer look at “the scandal”. Spoiler alert: There is no “political death” that might be the fault of a court – if at all, it was a (easily avoidable) suicide.
Continue reading >>Der Staat gegen Marine Le Pen?
Gestern ist die französische Politikerin Marine Le Pen wegen Veruntreuung öffentlicher Gelder zu einer Geldstrafe i. H. v. 100.000 Euro sowie zu vier Jahren Freiheitsstrafe verurteilt worden. Besonders schwerwiegend und poli-tisch brisant: Als Nebenstrafe wird Le Pen mit sofortiger Wirkung für fünf Jahre das passive Wahlrecht entzogen, sodass sie sich bei den französischen Präsidentschaftswahlen im Jahr 2027 nicht zur Wahl wird stellen dürfen. Wurde hier nach Akten bestimmt, was an der Urne entschieden werden sollte?
Continue reading >>