Erfurt Shines
Last weekend I was in Erfurt, the place where the authoritarian-populist AfD party held its annual federal convention. On Saturday I got up at the crack of dawn to help block the AfD delegates from reaching the assembly hall. Was I supposed to do that? As managing director of a legal-scholarly discourse platform should I not have remained neutral? The demand to forbid oneself from discriminating between non-banned parties loyal to the constitution and non-banned parties hostile to it is questionable not only insofar as it is addressed to democratic civil society, but also and especially insofar as it is addressed to scholarship.
Continue reading >>
Der Glanz von Erfurt
Am letzten Wochenende war ich in Erfurt und bin am Samstag in aller Frühe aufgestanden, um den AfD-Bundesparteitag blockieren zu helfen. Durfte ich das? Hätte ich mich als Geschäftsführer einer rechtswissenschaftlichen Diskursplattform nicht neutral verhalten müssen? Die Forderung, sich selbst zu verbieten, zwischen nicht verbotenen verfassungskonformen und nicht verbotenen verfassungsfeindlichen Parteien zu diskriminieren, ist nicht nur fragwürdig, soweit sie sich an die demokratische Zivilgesellschaft, sondern auch und insbesondere soweit sie sich an die Wissenschaft richtet.
Continue reading >>
Wenn Justitia kurz die Augenbinde lupft
Am 7. Juli hat Justitia, so könnte man zugespitzt sagen, ihre Augenbinde nicht abgelegt, aber doch einen Moment lang angehoben – gerade lang genug, um sich der politischen Wirklichkeit zu vergewissern. Die Pariser Berufungsinstanz bestätigte zwar die Verurteilung Marine Le Pens wegen Veruntreuung öffentlicher Gelder, entschärfte aber zugleich den 2025 verhängten Entzug des passiven Wahlrechts so weit, dass eine Präsidentschaftskandidatur 2027 wieder möglich ist. Der Schuldspruch bleibt also bestehen – die Strafzumessung ragt aber weniger in den demokratischen Raum hinein.
Continue reading >>
More Than Mere Bystanders
After two years since the ICJ unequivocally declared Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as unlawful, the European Commission is expected to finally propose measures to “restrict” EU trade with illegal Israeli settlements ahead of the next European Council meeting on 13 July. While most proposals explore suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement, adopting targeted sanctions against Israeli officials and settlers, or imposing tariffs on settlement trade, these measures are not enough to dismantle a link of complicity where a complete embargo on Israeli colonies is required.
Continue reading >>
Vom „Jedermannsrecht“ zum Privileg für Wenige
Die Informationsfreiheit in Deutschland befindet sich in einer Krise. Bereits die Ampelregierung hatte ihr Versprechen nicht eingelöst, die Informationsfreiheitsgesetze zu einem Transparenzgesetz weiterzuentwickeln. Dieser Trend gipfelte im Papier des Koalitionsausschusses vom 2.7.2026. Im Rahmen einer Paketlösung hat die Bundesregierung angekündigt, das IFG umfassend zu ändern. Die politischen Vorschläge des Koalitionsausschusses sind aus unserer Sicht weitreichend, sodass die Informationsfreiheit in Deutschland faktisch abgeschafft werden könnte. Einschränkungen im Anwendungsbereich, hohe Gebühren und neue Ablehnungsgründe würden eine zentrale Ressource der Demokratie aushöhlen.
Continue reading >>
(De)Valuing Citizenship
Last Tuesday, the US Supreme Court released its final merits opinion of its October 2025 term. In Trump v Barbara, a razor thin 5-4 majority deemed the President’s attempt to deny American citizenship to children born on U.S soil to immigrant parents who are undocumented or present on certain visas unconstitutional. The decision is a rare and important win for immigrants and American constitutional democracy. But Barbara should not be remembered as an example of principled judicial resistance against gross executive overreach.
Continue reading >>
AI Is Eating the Book World
In 2011, Marc Andreessen, a key figure in California’s venture capital scene, coined the phrase: “Software is eating the world.” The phrase describes the spread of software into everyday life and the displacement of physical business models. This process continues in an unexpectedly literal sense: AI companies purchase used books, scan them, and dispose of them to gather input for their models. The reason for this seemingly cumbersome method is the expectation that it will fall under the fair use provision of U.S. copyright law.
Continue reading >>
The Problems with “General Purpose AI Detectability”
As AI-generated media flood our information ecosystems, detecting synthetic content has become an urgent regulatory challenge – in fact, not one challenge but many, as synthetic media breeds problems across a range of digital contexts, including deepfakes and disinformation, scamming, and content moderation. The EU's new "Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content" – the first concrete articulation of Article 50(2) AI Act, the EU's approach to AI-content detection – gives sensible answers to several open questions and will advance the global regulatory debate.
Continue reading >>
The Politics of Provocation
A recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights concerning a TikTok video published by a Georgian self-defined civil activist adds another layer to the Court’s increasingly messy Article 10 case law. The applicant repeatedly insulted public officials in crude and sexually explicit terms while broadcasting to a large online audience. Domestic courts imposed only a modest administrative fine, later reduced on appeal. The ECtHR did not find a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression – raising several questions about the limits of legitimate political speech online.
Continue reading >>
Von Zustimmung und Widersprüchen
Am 25. Juni diskutierte der Bundestag wieder über die Organspende. In der Grundsatzdebatte ging es um die Frage, ob die aktuell geltende „Zustimmungslösung“ durch die effektivere „Widerspruchslösung“ ersetzt werden sollte. Ich analysiere diesen Streit aus ethischer Sicht und argumentiere für eine Perspektivänderung: Wir müssen uns vor Augen führen, wie die Widerspruchsregelung das Recht auf Selbstbestimmung genau verletzt – und in welchem Maße.
Continue reading >>
CURRENT DEBATES
European Society After Commission v Hungary
The landmark judgment in Commission v Hungary has opened a new chapter in the history of EU law. In this decision, the CJEU not only held that Article 2 TEU can be invoked as a self-standing provision in infringement proceedings but also acknowledged the existence of a European society, in which certain values prevail – a historic first. In this symposium, we aim at showing the diverse ways in which scholars from law, philosophy, and the social sciences reflect on European society, in and beyond Commission v Hungary.
Read all articles >>Inter-Judicial Dialogue on Climate Change and Human Rights
This symposium brings together judges, practitioners, and scholars from the European, Inter-American, and African regional human rights systems to examine climate change as a human rights challenge, tracing shared legal questions, divergent doctrinal responses, and the growing importance of inter-judicial dialogue in shaping transnational climate justice.
Read all articles >>ADVERTISEMENT
Volume 7,
Issue 2
July 2025
JUS COGENS
-
Killing Hitler Word by Word: The Oath as Apocalyptic Lawmaking
GREGOR NOLL
-
Adjudicating Climate Protest as a Tool of Modern Republicanism
DMITRII KUZNETSOV
OUR LATEST PUBLICATION
Christophe Geiger & Bernd Justin Jütte (eds.)
Enabling Access, Fostering Innovation: Towards a Digital Knowledge Agenda in Europe
Access to knowledge and information is essential to foster innovation. In the EU, existing copyright rules pose significant barriers to research and education. Instead of promoting access to knowledge resources, copyright creates legal uncertainty for researchers and educators and enables information intermediaries to exercise strict control over the use of protected works. This edited volume proposes ways out of the copyright conundrum by rethinking copyright as an access right.
Discover the Open Access digital edition here.
EDITORIAL
Erfurt Shines
Last weekend I was in Erfurt, the place where the authoritarian-populist AfD party held its annual federal convention. On Saturday I got up at the crack of dawn to help block the AfD delegates from reaching the assembly hall. Was I supposed to do that? As managing director of a legal-scholarly discourse platform should I not have remained neutral? The demand to forbid oneself from discriminating between non-banned parties loyal to the constitution and non-banned parties hostile to it is questionable not only insofar as it is addressed to democratic civil society, but also and especially insofar as it is addressed to scholarship.
VB SECURITY AND CRIME
In cooperation with:
VB Security and Crime is a cooperation of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (MPI-CSL) and the Verfassungsblog in the areas of public security law and criminal law. The MPI-CSL Institute is a member of the Max Planck Law network.