This article belongs to the debate » Heidelberger Salon
10 February 2022

Heidelberger Salon digital: Guardians of Free Speech

Meta‘s Oversight Board and (other) Courts and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

10.02.2022 | 17:00-18:30 / 5 pm (CET) | Via Zoom / Livestream
Heidelberger Salon digital: “Who is the Guardian of Free Speech? Meta‘s Oversight Board and (other) Courts and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms”

A conversation with Catalina Botero-Marino, Martin Eifert, Matthias Kettemann and Erik Tuchtfeld. Hosted by Alexandra Kemmerer.

The spread of misinformation and hate speech has led to calls for a more active role of social networks in curating content. Others fear censorship and arbitrariness. In this stormy debate, Meta decided to share the responsibility for the enforcement of its community guidelines on Facebook and Instagram by setting up the Oversight Board (OB), an independent body which can review decisions taken by Meta on the removal of posts and blocking of users.

At the same time, State courts in Europe intervene more and more in the content moderation process, inter alia with the German Bundesgerichtshof annulling parts of Facebook’s Terms and Conditions and the German Bundesverfassungsgericht as well as the Italian Corte Costituzionale ordering Meta to unblock users. US-American courts, on the other hand, have regularly rejected claims against social media companies aiming at the reinstatement of content or user accounts.

  • Oversight Board’s Co-Chair and former Inter-American Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression Professor Catalina Botero-Marino (Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University),
  • Professor Martin Eifert (Humboldt University Berlin),
  • Professor Matthias Kettemann (University of Innsbruck / Hans Bredow Institute, Hamburg)
  • and Erik Tuchtfeld (MPIL)

will discuss the relationship between State courts and emerging private dispute resolution mechanisms in the realm of content moderation, their effect on freedom of speech on the internet and new regulatory proposals in instruments such as “Europe’s Constitution for Internet Platforms”, the Digital Services Act.

Moderated by Alexandra Kemmerer, Senior Research Fellow and Academic Coordinator at MPIL, and head of the Institute’s Berlin Office

For active participation, please register here and contact at

SUGGESTED CITATION  Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, ; , : Heidelberger Salon digital: Guardians of Free Speech: Meta‘s Oversight Board and (other) Courts and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, VerfBlog, 2022/2/10,

Leave A Comment


1. We welcome your comments but you do so as our guest. Please note that we will exercise our property rights to make sure that Verfassungsblog remains a safe and attractive place for everyone. Your comment will not appear immediately but will be moderated by us. Just as with posts, we make a choice. That means not all submitted comments will be published.

2. We expect comments to be matter-of-fact, on-topic and free of sarcasm, innuendo and ad personam arguments.

3. Racist, sexist and otherwise discriminatory comments will not be published.

4. Comments under pseudonym are allowed but a valid email address is obligatory. The use of more than one pseudonym is not allowed.