23 March 2026
My Voice, My Choice
The European Citizens’ Initiative My Voice, My Choice for safe and accessible abortion, signed by over 1.2 million people, has proven remarkably successful. On 26 February 2026, the Commission announced that it will link abortion services to the European Social Fund Plus, thereby effectively enabling Member States to use EU funds to provide these services to women across the Union. While the Commission did not establish a new European right to abortion in a new law, it has effectively provided European budgetary support for abortion services for the first time. Continue reading >>
0 
23 March 2026
Fourteen Years for a Mere Designation
On 5 March 2026, in its C-613/24 judgment, the CJEU fined Portugal for €10 million for its failure to comply with a 2019 judgment (C-290/18) on the Habitats Directive. In addition, the Court imposed a daily penalty payment of €41,250 until the judgment is fully complied with. This ruling is in many ways arguably a straightforward enforcement case. However, it demonstrates that enforcement action even for basic implementation simply takes too long. In addition, it highlights the need for follow-up action under Article 260 of the TFEU to ensure that judgments are actually implemented. Continue reading >>
0
13 March 2026
Schlechte Aussichten für Geflüchtete
Reform oder Rückschritt? Mit dem GEAS-Anpassungsgesetz setzt Deutschland die Reform des europäischen Asylsystems um. Doch statt nur europäische Vorgaben umzusetzen, schafft das Gesetz weitreichende neue Möglichkeiten zur Beschränkung der Bewegungsfreiheit und zur Inhaftierung von Schutzsuchenden. Lediglich beim Menschenrechts-Monitoring enthält es eine spürbare Verbesserung. Continue reading >>
0
06 March 2026
Patchwork Law (Love)
The ruling coalition came to power on a clear promise: to liberalize abortion law and introduce legal recognition for same-sex couples. A new bill on cohabitation agreements seeks to grant both same-sex and opposite-sex couples selected rights currently reserved for married spouses, aiming to make everyday family life easier while deliberately preserving a clear legal and symbolic distinction from marriage. The result is a piecemeal framework that risks creating second-class family relationships while leaving some key issues unresolved or overly complicated. Continue reading >>
0
19 February 2026
Text Is Not Enough
Advocate General Ćapeta’s Opinion in Case C-225/24, of 12 February 2026, clarifies that, in contexts of systemic rule-of-law deterioration, compliance cannot be measured solely by legislative text, while also explaining the constraints of discretionary power in EU fund cases. Rule-of-law compliance must be assessed through effective implementation and attention to the broader constitutional environment. The Opinion articulates an evaluative logic for EU rule-of-law governance that is particularly significant in backsliding settings and foreshadows the standards required for constitutional reconstruction after illiberal rule. Continue reading >>
0
18 February 2026
Has the European Parliament Shot Itself in the Foot?
After 25 years of negotiations, on 6 December 2024, the EU and four Mercosur countries – Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay – reached an EU-Mercosur Agreement. The geoeconomic importance of this Agreement cannot be understated. Against this background, it came as a surprise when a narrow majority in the EP, backed by far-right and far-left parties alike, on 21 January 2026, requested an opinion on its compatibility with EU law. By contesting the legality of the Agreement, the EP risks losing a formal say over the temporal application of the “trade part” of broader mixed agreements pending ratification in the Member States. Continue reading >>11 February 2026
A Prematurely Hailed Victory
Last year, the CJEU issued a seminal ruling concerning cross-border recognition of same-sex marriages, obliging Poland to acknowledge such unions in the civil register. Given Poland’s legal architecture, marriage transcription alone will not enhance protection of same-sex couples. No rights granted to heterosexual couples by virtue of marriage will be conferred on same-sex couples following the transcription. For this to happen, recognition of same-sex marriages in the civil register must go in tandem with the adoption of a statutory regulation of same-sex unions. Continue reading >>02 February 2026
Time to Rethink Locus Standi
The General Court dismissed the action brought by the Association of Jurists for Respect for International Law. JURDI requested the Court to declare that the EU institutions had failed to act in response to the situation in Gaza. Admittedly, the Court’s decision to deny locus standi is consistent with the case law under Articles 263 and 265 TFEU. However, it is high time the Court moves towards a participatory model of legality review that would allow for actions to be brought by non-governmental organisations in the public interest of human rights compliance. Continue reading >>27 January 2026
The Rule‑of‑Law Reports Embedded in Political Conditions
While the EU is navigating both external geopolitical instability and internal challenges to constitutional norms, these pressures have made the annual Rule of Law Reports more politically consequential than ever. Yet the persistence of the rule of law crisis reveals a deeper political reality: the effectiveness of the Reports depends less on their design than on the domestic political conditions in which they land. Where illiberal incumbents remain entrenched, they are easily deflected, reframed as external interference, or simply ignored. Continue reading >>
0
24 January 2026
Case C‑19/23 on the Minimum Wage Directive
The Decision on the validity of the “Minimum Wage Directive” from November 2025 was analysed from several aspects, but in the present commentary, I focus on the Court’s interpretation of the limit set by Article 153(5) TFEU to the Union’s legislative competence. The latter excludes the adoption of measures relating to […] “pay”. Arguably, the Court’s reasoning shrinks the contours of the exclusion of “pay”, thereby limiting the practical reach of Article 153(5) TFEU in a way that invites consideration of whether the retained national competences are taken seriously. Continue reading >>
0