17 November 2022
Picking Primacy over Procedural Autonomy
On 8 November, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court’) decided that national courts are required to ascertain of their own motion whether detention of an illegally staying foreign national or asylum seeker is lawful. This judgment is an example of the ever-growing impact of EU law on national procedural rules, especially in the migration law area. The judgment is also noteworthy because of the difference in approach between, on the one hand, the Court and, on the other hand, the Dutch referring courts and AG Richard de la Tour. Continue reading >>
0 
15 November 2022
Seven Months in the Freezing Forest
On 10 November 2022, Latvia extended the emergency situation at its border with Belarus for a further three months – now until February 2023. Introduced in August 2021 in response to the perceived ‘hybrid attack’ organised by Minsk, the state of emergency has since been renewed five times, effectively becoming a permanent condition. In practical terms that means that Latvia will continue carrying out systematic pushbacks – despite the very low number of border crossing attempts and allegations of gross violations of human rights. Continue reading >>28 October 2022
Unexploited Monitoring Opportunities
Over the last year and a half, the European Border Coast Guard Agency has been under an unprecedented scrutiny. The Frontex saga started in 2020 when investigative journalists published ground-breaking findings, revealing how the Agency was breaching the law being complicit with human rights violations committed by Greek authorities. National Parliaments could play a bigger role in monitoring Frontex, serving as a complementary avenue for democratic oversight, in addition to the European Parliament. Continue reading >>
0
07 September 2022
Frontex and Migrants’ Access to Justice
While possibly marking a step in the right direction towards more political accountability, the controversial resignation of Frontex’s former Executive Director, Fabrice Leggeri, leaves open the question about the effective judicial protection for migrants interacting with the agency. A number of judicial actions are brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), as the only competent tribunal with jurisdiction on Frontex. By critically reviewing these judicial actions from the perspective of migrants’ access to justice, this post aims to flag the limits of the existing system of EU judicial remedies in light of Frontex wrongdoings. Beyond access to a court, access to justice vis-à-vis EU migration agencies must integrate elements of good governance, such as transparency and accountability. Continue reading >>24 August 2022
NGOs in distress
During the summer of 2020, two ships operated by the non-governmental organization Sea Watch reached Italian shores after rescuing migrants in distress at sea. Upon arrival, both ships were detained at two Sicilian ports. Sea Watch brought two legal actions for the annulment of the detention measures. On 1 August 2022, the CJEU delivered its judgement on the case. Continue reading >>
0
05 July 2022
The Costs of Outsourcing
Last month the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) granted an urgent interim measure according to Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court in a case concerning an imminent removal of an asylum-seeker from the UK to Rwanda. The UK's policy of outsourcing sets another dangerous precedence when it comes to restricting territorial asylum and the basic rights of asylum seekers. It is expensive, contrary to international human rights obligations, has significant adverse effects on those affected, scratches the state´s reputation, and increases existing tensions with the ECtHR. Continue reading >>
0
25 May 2022
Die grenzenlose Aufnahme der ukrainischen Flüchtlinge und was wir daraus lernen
Mit der spontanen Aufnahme der ukrainischen Frauen, Kinder und Hilfsbedürftigen hat die europäische Zivilgesellschaft gezeigt, wie gut sie mit Flüchtlingen interagieren kann, wenn die Grenzen sich öffnen und hemmende Regulierungen entfallen. Die Staaten lernen in den letzten Wochen, eher unterstützend als kontrollierend zu wirken. Diese Erfahrungen sollten motivieren, kritischer als bisher zu hinterfragen, wieweit Einschränkungen der freien Entfaltung Geflüchteter und ihrer Unterstützer sinnvoll sind. Continue reading >>
0
30 March 2022
Does the Threat of Terrorism Justify Migration Restrictions?
Barring migrants for the sake of achieving marginal reductions of already very low risks of terrorism might be justified if restrictions imposed few or no morally significant costs. But, in fact, barring migrants fleeing oppression and war is a grave wrong. It inflicts enormous harm, violates human rights against unjust discrimination, and is also inimical to concepts of dignity prominent in modern European and international law jurisprudence. Continue reading >>
0
01 December 2021
„Neuanfang“ im „modernen Einwanderungsland“?
Jedem Anfang wohnt ein Zauber inne. So gehört es zu den Ritualen einer neuen Regierung, der Bevölkerung einen Aufbruch in bessere Zeiten zu versprechen. Doch mit dem Koalitionsvertrag endet der Wahlkampf. Ab jetzt sind die Versprechungen umzusetzen. In der Migrationspolitik will die Ampel nicht weniger als einen „Neuanfang“ im „modernen Einwanderungsland“. Mittels eines „Paradigmenwechsels“ soll künftig eine „aktive und ordnende Politik“ betrieben werden, die „irreguläre Migration reduzieren und reguläre Migration ermöglichen“ will. Deutschland wird konsequent zu einem der liberalsten und großzügigsten Einwanderungsländer der westlichen Welt ausgebaut. Continue reading >>28 November 2021
Mauern wieder denkbar machen
1985 versuchte die DDR die Bundesrepublik zu destabilisieren, indem sie für tamilische Geflüchtete aus Sri Lanka ein "Loch in der Mauer" nach Westberlin öffnete. Nicht ohne Erfolg: der Diskurs über „Scheinasylanten“ nahm Fahrt auf, „Die Republikaner“ setzten zu ihren größten Erfolgen an. Angesichts der Furcht vor dem Flüchtling hatten andere Parteien das Geschäft übernommen, Migration als schädlich, Asyl als Überforderung und den universalen Geltungsanspruch der Grundrechte als Traumtänzerei darzustellen. Die damals Geborenen sind mittlerweile Eltern, Deutschland ist in mitten eines neuen Europas vereint – aber einige Kosten des damals eingeschlagenen Kurses werden immer deutlicher sichtbar. Continue reading >>
0