12 Mai 2023
Automated predictive threat detection after Ligue des Droits Humains
The Ligue des droits humains ruling regarding automated predictive threat detection has implications for the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) Regulation and the EU Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on combating online child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Both legal instruments entail the use of potentially self-learning algorithms, and are spiritual successors to the PNR Directive (the subject of Ligue des droits humains). Continue reading >>
0 
08 Mai 2023
Automated predictive threat detection after Ligue des Droits Humains
On 21 June 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union released its judgment regarding the compatibility of the EU Directive on Passenger Name Record Data with the rights to privacy and personal data protection. Ligue des droits humains has already qualified as a landmark decision, where the Court had the opportunity, among other aspects, to provide comprehensive guidelines on how large-scale predictive policing should take place. The ruling could be used as an inspiration for the legal assessment of various new security law instruments which require automated predictive threat detection instruments. Continue reading >>
0
08 Mai 2023
The Future of the European Security Architecture: A Debate Series
This debate series is dedicated to Ligue des Droits Humains – a case in which the Court of Justice of the European Union decided on the fate of one of the main drivers of this development: the Directive on on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime. The PNR Directive, being one of the first major EU-wide examples of predictive policing, is not just interesting in itself. It exemplifies the emergence and gradual consolidation of a new security architecture in Europe. Continue reading >>
0
08 August 2022
Immer noch lückenhaft
Am 27. Juli 2022 hat die Bundesregierung ihren Entwurf für ein „Gesetz für einen besseren Schutz hinweisgebender Personen sowie zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie zum Schutz von Personen, die Verstöße gegen das Unionsrecht melden“ offiziell vorgestellt, dessen Kern das geplante Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz (HinSchG) bildet. Mit dem HinSchG wird der deutsche Gesetzgeber erstmals ein Stammgesetz zum Thema „Whistleblowing“ schaffen, also der Aufdeckung von Rechtsverstößen und anderen Missständen durch Organisationsinsider. Der Entwurf weist jedoch gerade in vielen besonders Whistleblowing-relevanten Bereichen erhebliche Lücken auf. Continue reading >>
0
23 Juni 2022
A Directive altered beyond recognition
On 21 June 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union rendered its decision in the preliminary ruling procedure on the fate of the PNR Directive. The Court had a chance to decisively answer one of the most crucial questions facing European security law: Is indiscriminate mass data retention for and the technology-induced analysis of ordinary human behavior compatible with fundamental rights? It instead opted for an enigmatic compromise creating a whole host of new questions. It does not change the fact that the PNR Directive survives – as a strange beast altered beyond recognition. Continue reading >>
0
28 Januar 2022
A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU's preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lack of clarity and precision in certain points, generally considers the PNR Directive to be “compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data”. His arguments are not convincing. Continue reading >>
0
07 Januar 2021
Alles unter Verschluss
Das Bundesjustizministerium hat am 12. Dezember 2020 seinen Referentenentwurf zur Umsetzung der europäischen Whistleblowing-Richtlinie (2019/1937) (WBRL) an die Presse weitergereicht. Hinweise von Whistleblowern bezüglich Verschlusssachen sollen pauschal vom Anwendungsbereich der Richtlinie ausgenommen bleiben. In der Praxis würde die Effektivität des Schutzes von Hinweisgebern in staatlichen Behörden hierdurch massiv untergraben. Ein mutigerer Weg ist möglich: Die Einsetzung eines Bundestransparenzbeauftragten. Continue reading >>
0
29 Oktober 2020