16 September 2009

Obamas Gesundheitsreform verfassungswidrig?

Das ist hübsch: Im WSJ findet ein Mensch namens Andrew Napolitano, früherer Richter aus New Jersey und jetzt „senior legal analyst“ bei Fox News, dass Obamas Gesundheitsreform verfassungswidrig ist – weil nämlich die Bundesebene gar nicht zuständig sei. Die US-Verfassung ermächtige den Kongress nur, „interstate commerce“ zu regulieren. Dienstleistungen im Gesundheitsbereich seien aber nicht grenzüberschreitend, und auch kein Kommerz:

The practice of medicine consists of the delivery of intimate services to the human body. In almost all instances, the delivery of medical services occurs in one place and does not move across interstate lines. One goes to a physician not to engage in commercial activity, as the Framers of the Constitution understood, but to improve one’s health.

Wo er recht hat, hat er recht. Warum die Argumentation trotzdem bescheuert ist, kann man, wenn man sich’s nicht selber denken kann, bei Evan Falchuk im See First Blog nachlesen.


SUGGESTED CITATION  Steinbeis, Maximilian: Obamas Gesundheitsreform verfassungswidrig?, VerfBlog, 2009/9/16, https://verfassungsblog.de/obamas-gesundheitsreform-verfassungswidrig/.

Leave A Comment

WRITE A COMMENT

1. We welcome your comments but you do so as our guest. Please note that we will exercise our property rights to make sure that Verfassungsblog remains a safe and attractive place for everyone. Your comment will not appear immediately but will be moderated by us. Just as with posts, we make a choice. That means not all submitted comments will be published.

2. We expect comments to be matter-of-fact, on-topic and free of sarcasm, innuendo and ad personam arguments.

3. Racist, sexist and otherwise discriminatory comments will not be published.

4. Comments under pseudonym are allowed but a valid email address is obligatory. The use of more than one pseudonym is not allowed.




Other posts about this region:
USA


Other posts about this region:
USA
No Comments Join the discussion