Wehrdienst unter einem verfassungsfeindlichen Verteidigungsminister
Welche Handlungsmöglichkeiten haben Soldatinnen und Soldaten, wenn ihr oberster Dienstherr nicht mehr auf dem Boden der freiheitlich demokratischen Grundordnung steht? Für die meisten kommt weder in Betracht, unter einem verfassungsfeindlichen Verteidigungsminister zu dienen, noch zu desertieren und sich damit strafbar zu machen. Beides kann ihnen ebenso wenig zugemutet werden. Das Soldatengesetz bietet bislang keine Möglichkeit, in so einem Fall das Dienstverhältnis ohne große Hürden zu beenden. Daher ist es geboten, verfassungstreuen Soldat:innen einen rechtssicheren und unbürokratischen „legalen Exit“ aus der Bundeswehr zu ermöglichen.
Continue reading >>
Heatwaves and Legal Remedies
Europe suffered an unprecedented heatwave this June, with debilitating effects felt across various walks of life: thousands of deaths, particularly among the elderly, individuals and families suffering in “heat-trap” apartments, hospitals full and caught unprepared, school closures, and productivity losses. Adaptation measures are indispensable for coping with these soaring temperatures, which have cost lives and severely affected people’s well-being. However, rights-based litigation involving adaptation in Europe has until recently been notable by its absence.
Continue reading >>
Schädlicher Schutz?
Nachdem das Europäische Parlament bereits am 19.05.2026 abgelehnt hatte, die Immunität der Abgeordneten Angelika Niebler aufzuheben, stimmte es am 07.07.2026 gegen die Aufhebung der Immunität des Abgeordneten Ilhan Kyuchyuk. In beiden Verfahren kamen die Anträge auf Aufhebung der Immunität von der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft. Die beiden Fälle weisen neben Gemeinsamkeiten auch Unterschiede auf. Deutlich wird dabei, dass das Verhältnis zwischen Europäischer Staatsanwaltschaft und Europaparlamentariern immer mehr zur Zerreißprobe wird und Reformen bedarf.
Continue reading >>
Dignity Without Autonomy
In Prajwala v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that victims of trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation have a right to rehabilitation under Article 23 read with the right to dignity under Article 21. While the judgment has been celebrated for its three-dimensional dignity framework, it is a missed opportunity to articulate a constitutional basis for protecting the rights of sex workers. The Court's dignity framework – calibrated against objectification in trafficking – is insufficient alone to address persons who assert agency over their work. I argue that reading it alongside decisional autonomy fills the gap.
Continue reading >>
Erfurt Shines
Last weekend I was in Erfurt, the place where the authoritarian-populist AfD party held its annual federal convention. On Saturday I got up at the crack of dawn to help block the AfD delegates from reaching the assembly hall. Was I supposed to do that? As managing director of a legal-scholarly discourse platform should I not have remained neutral? The demand to forbid oneself from discriminating between non-banned parties loyal to the constitution and non-banned parties hostile to it is questionable not only insofar as it is addressed to democratic civil society, but also and especially insofar as it is addressed to scholarship.
Continue reading >>
Der Glanz von Erfurt
Am letzten Wochenende war ich in Erfurt und bin am Samstag in aller Frühe aufgestanden, um den AfD-Bundesparteitag blockieren zu helfen. Durfte ich das? Hätte ich mich als Geschäftsführer einer rechtswissenschaftlichen Diskursplattform nicht neutral verhalten müssen? Die Forderung, sich selbst zu verbieten, zwischen nicht verbotenen verfassungskonformen und nicht verbotenen verfassungsfeindlichen Parteien zu diskriminieren, ist nicht nur fragwürdig, soweit sie sich an die demokratische Zivilgesellschaft, sondern auch und insbesondere soweit sie sich an die Wissenschaft richtet.
Continue reading >>
Wenn Justitia kurz die Augenbinde lupft
Am 7. Juli hat Justitia, so könnte man zugespitzt sagen, ihre Augenbinde nicht abgelegt, aber doch einen Moment lang angehoben – gerade lang genug, um sich der politischen Wirklichkeit zu vergewissern. Die Pariser Berufungsinstanz bestätigte zwar die Verurteilung Marine Le Pens wegen Veruntreuung öffentlicher Gelder, entschärfte aber zugleich den 2025 verhängten Entzug des passiven Wahlrechts so weit, dass eine Präsidentschaftskandidatur 2027 wieder möglich ist. Der Schuldspruch bleibt also bestehen – die Strafzumessung ragt aber weniger in den demokratischen Raum hinein.
Continue reading >>
More Than Mere Bystanders
After two years since the ICJ unequivocally declared Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as unlawful, the European Commission is expected to finally propose measures to “restrict” EU trade with illegal Israeli settlements ahead of the next European Council meeting on 13 July. While most proposals explore suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement, adopting targeted sanctions against Israeli officials and settlers, or imposing tariffs on settlement trade, these measures are not enough to dismantle a link of complicity where a complete embargo on Israeli colonies is required.
Continue reading >>
Vom „Jedermannsrecht“ zum Privileg für Wenige
Die Informationsfreiheit in Deutschland befindet sich in einer Krise. Bereits die Ampelregierung hatte ihr Versprechen nicht eingelöst, die Informationsfreiheitsgesetze zu einem Transparenzgesetz weiterzuentwickeln. Dieser Trend gipfelte im Papier des Koalitionsausschusses vom 2.7.2026. Im Rahmen einer Paketlösung hat die Bundesregierung angekündigt, das IFG umfassend zu ändern. Die politischen Vorschläge des Koalitionsausschusses sind aus unserer Sicht weitreichend, sodass die Informationsfreiheit in Deutschland faktisch abgeschafft werden könnte. Einschränkungen im Anwendungsbereich, hohe Gebühren und neue Ablehnungsgründe würden eine zentrale Ressource der Demokratie aushöhlen.
Continue reading >>(De)Valuing Citizenship
Last Tuesday, the US Supreme Court released its final merits opinion of its October 2025 term. In Trump v Barbara, a razor thin 5-4 majority deemed the President’s attempt to deny American citizenship to children born on U.S soil to immigrant parents who are undocumented or present on certain visas unconstitutional. The decision is a rare and important win for immigrants and American constitutional democracy. But Barbara should not be remembered as an example of principled judicial resistance against gross executive overreach.
Continue reading >>
CURRENT DEBATES
European Society After Commission v Hungary
The landmark judgment in Commission v Hungary has opened a new chapter in the history of EU law. In this decision, the CJEU not only held that Article 2 TEU can be invoked as a self-standing provision in infringement proceedings but also acknowledged the existence of a European society, in which certain values prevail – a historic first. In this symposium, we aim at showing the diverse ways in which scholars from law, philosophy, and the social sciences reflect on European society, in and beyond Commission v Hungary.
Read all articles >>Inter-Judicial Dialogue on Climate Change and Human Rights
This symposium brings together judges, practitioners, and scholars from the European, Inter-American, and African regional human rights systems to examine climate change as a human rights challenge, tracing shared legal questions, divergent doctrinal responses, and the growing importance of inter-judicial dialogue in shaping transnational climate justice.
Read all articles >>ADVERTISEMENT
Volume 7,
Issue 2
July 2025
JUS COGENS
-
Killing Hitler Word by Word: The Oath as Apocalyptic Lawmaking
GREGOR NOLL
-
Adjudicating Climate Protest as a Tool of Modern Republicanism
DMITRII KUZNETSOV
OUR LATEST PUBLICATION
Christophe Geiger & Bernd Justin Jütte (eds.)
Enabling Access, Fostering Innovation: Towards a Digital Knowledge Agenda in Europe
Access to knowledge and information is essential to foster innovation. In the EU, existing copyright rules pose significant barriers to research and education. Instead of promoting access to knowledge resources, copyright creates legal uncertainty for researchers and educators and enables information intermediaries to exercise strict control over the use of protected works. This edited volume proposes ways out of the copyright conundrum by rethinking copyright as an access right.
Discover the Open Access digital edition here.
EDITORIAL
Erfurt Shines
Last weekend I was in Erfurt, the place where the authoritarian-populist AfD party held its annual federal convention. On Saturday I got up at the crack of dawn to help block the AfD delegates from reaching the assembly hall. Was I supposed to do that? As managing director of a legal-scholarly discourse platform should I not have remained neutral? The demand to forbid oneself from discriminating between non-banned parties loyal to the constitution and non-banned parties hostile to it is questionable not only insofar as it is addressed to democratic civil society, but also and especially insofar as it is addressed to scholarship.
VB SECURITY AND CRIME
In cooperation with:
VB Security and Crime is a cooperation of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (MPI-CSL) and the Verfassungsblog in the areas of public security law and criminal law. The MPI-CSL Institute is a member of the Max Planck Law network.