26 June 2026
Stammheim to Stammheim
When German readers encounter the word “Stammheim”, they usually do not think of a quiet, leafy suburb in the city of Stuttgart. Instead, the name immediately evokes Germany's most notorious maximum-security prison. It conjures images of a dark chapter in Germany’s history: the era of homegrown left-wing terrorism and a state in existential crisis. Stammheim is the physical embodiment of a profound democratic dilemma: how should a constitutional democracy deal with those it considers an existential threat from within? It is highly symbolic, then, that the Stuttgart Regional Court is using this infamous high-security courtroom to try five pro-Palestinian activists, a group dubbed the “Ulm5”. Continue reading >>
2 
18 June 2026
The Judiciary Exits the Scene
The Court of Appeal has reversed the High Court's ruling that the proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful. A special five-judge panel found the ban proportionate, affording the Home Secretary wide latitude on national security grounds. The result of the ruling, and its lop-sided account of the separation of powers, is to remove meaningful legal constraint on the Home Secretary’s capacity to proscribe a group for operational effectiveness reasons, even if that group only has minimal engagement with activities that satisfy the definition of terrorism, as well as with respect to invasive national security powers more broadly. Continue reading >>
0
03 March 2026
Free Speech, Protest and the High Court’s Ruling on the Proscription of Palestine Action
On 13 February, the High Court of England and Wales ruled that the UK government’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action did not follow the government’s own policy and was contrary to the rights to freedom of expression and assembly. The case highlights how proscription, a sweeping power “designed to ensure that an organisation ceases to exist”, significantly affects the rights of people outside the organisation. Given the breadth of the restriction, the court came to the right conclusion and provided an important safeguard for free speech and protest rights. Continue reading >>
0
17 February 2026
Soft Law in Hard Times
Seasoned court watchers were no doubt surprised by the English High Court’s decision to overturn the British Home Secretary’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action. For anybody even casually familiar with British courts’ approach to national security-related matters, the odds of success were not good. The judgment is certainly not a slam-dunk victory for Palestine Action and it is replete with extensive discussion condemning the actions of the group. And yet despite these admonishments, the judgment intimates at wider concerns as to the role of counter-terrorism legislation in liberal democracies Continue reading >>
0
21 August 2025
Palestine Action, Proscription and Proportionality
In July, the UK government has decided to proscribe the organisation Palestine Action. The order means that people are criminalised not just for expressing support for terrorist acts, but for the proscribed organisation. As a result, over 500 people were reportedly arrested at a protest in London on 9 August. Whether the decision pushes anti-terrorism law too far and violates freedom of expression will be assessed by the courts at a later date. If the decision survives a legal challenge, it could pave the way for proscription to be used in relation to a broader range of groups in future. Continue reading >>
0