28 July 2022
Accessing Information about Abortion
The U.S. Supreme Court decision of 24 June 2022 overruled a half century of precedent supporting a constitutional right to abortion across the U.S. established in 1973 in Roe v. Wade. Essentially, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization left the decision on abortion to individual states. The ruling, although astonishing, was not necessarily a surprise, after its draft had leaked a few weeks earlier. But to the surprise of many, almost immediately, Facebook and Instagram started removing posts informing about access to abortion pills, the Associated Press and Vice first reported. Continue reading >>
0 
16 March 2022
A Self-Regulatory Race to the Bottom through Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement in the Digital Services Act
Art. 18 of the draft Digital Services Act [Art. 21 in the final text] will introduce new dispute settlement processes. This addresses a legitimate policy concern, namely the need to enable effective recourse mechanisms for platform decisions. However, the concept fails when trying to combine the best of two worlds: solving disputes through real courts as well as through self-regulation. Art. 18 [Art. 21 in the final text] DSA raises serious concerns and should be substantially modified. Continue reading >>
0
14 March 2022
Terrorist content online and threats to freedom of expression
Many states have used these general stipulations contained in international law to introduce in their counterterrorism legislation specific provisions criminalizing the dissemination of ideas or opinions that might incite, endorse, or stimulate the commission of terrorist acts. With social media platforms, a new set of actors have begun setting the thresholds of what speech they will host, complicating governance. Continue reading >>
0
25 February 2022
Rethinking Rights in Social Media Governance
In the context of the broader ‘techlash’ against the power and exploitative practices of major platforms, EU lawmakers are increasingly emphasising ‘European values’ and fundamental rights protection. But relying only on human rights to guide both social media law and academic criticism thereof is excluding other normative perspectives that place greater emphasis on collective and social interests. This is deeply limiting – especially for critical scholarship and activism that calls for the law to redress structural inequality. Continue reading >>
0
23 February 2022
The next step towards auditing intermediaries
The lack of transparency of digital platforms is a well-known problem that has wide societal implications. There is now an extraordinary opportunity to establish legally mandated criteria for meaningful transparency for online platforms in the proposed EU Digital Services Act (DSA). However, their success will depend on the strength of oversight mechanisms which need to be accompanied by sufficient access to data. Hence, we propose creating an auditing intermediary to assure the effectiveness of such oversight. Continue reading >>
0
08 February 2022
Die Moderation von extremistischen Inhalten ist fehleranfällig und verursacht reale Schäden
Maßnahmen, die die Möglichkeiten terroristischer Gruppen, sich zu organisieren, zu rekrutieren und aufzuwiegeln einschränken sollen, wurden in den letzten Jahren ausgeweitet und führen häufig dazu, dass nicht nur extremistische Äußerungen, sondern auch Menschenrechtsdokumente, Gegenrede und Kunst gelöscht werden. In allen Bereichen der Moderation kommt es zu Fehlern, unabhängig davon, ob die Moderation von Menschen, künstlicher Intelligenz oder einer Kombination aus beidem durchgeführt werden. Continue reading >>
0
21 December 2021
Don’t shoot the Messenger
Die deutsche Politik hat Telegram als zentrales Problem für den gesellschaftlichen Frieden entdeckt. Die Nutzung von Telegram zur Verbreitung von Mordaufrufen und Beleidigungen, zur Organisation (auch) rechtswidriger Demonstrationen und schließlich zur Planung von Attentaten führte dazu, dass die neue Bundesinnenministerin Faeser (SPD) und auch Justizminister Buschmann (FDP) ein energisches Vorgehen gegen Telegram ankündigen. Weil die Kontrolle privater Kommunikation eine auch in anderen Kontexten immer stärker werdende Forderung in gesetzgeberischen Vorhaben ist, sollen noch einmal auf die äußerst engen verfassungsrechtlichen Voraussetzungen hierfür hingewiesen werden. Continue reading >>18 November 2021
Digital Services Act: Europaparlament diskutiert Netzsperren gegen Plattformen
Die Beratungen über den Digital Services Act nehmen eine besorgniserregende Wendung. Im Ringen um eine gemeinsame Verhandlungsposition des Europaparlaments schlägt die Berichterstatterin Christel Schaldemose laut dem Tagesspiegel vor, dass Behörden die vollständige Sperrung von Online-Plattformen anordnen dürfen. Sogenannte ‚Netzsperren‘ sind bereits umstritten, der aktuelle Vorschlag stellt jedoch alles bisher Dagewesene in den Schatten, sprengt die Systematik der Sanktionen im DSA und ist mit den Grundrechten unvereinbar. Continue reading >>
0
14 September 2021
Legalizing Disinformation
On 6 September 2021, Brazil’s president Jair Bolsonaro enacted a provisional measure (an executive order with immediate legal force and a deadline of 120 days for Congress ratification) which replaced several norms of the so called “Brazilian Internet Bill of Rights”. Bypassing the legislative, Bolsonaro avoided the political debate concerning social media regulation to continue his deeply problematic use of these tools. The provisional measure is unconstitutional for formal and material reasons. Continue reading >>
0
12 March 2021
On the Creation and the Slaying of Monsters
On paradigm change, generational change, antitrust law, and Amazon Continue reading >>
0