10 March 2025
Pushbacks und Verschwindenlassen von Menschen an den Grenzen Europas
Ende des letzten Jahres veröffentlichte die Europäische Kommission eine Mitteilung über die Abwehr hybrider Bedrohungen infolge des Einsatzes von „Migration als Waffe“. Migration werde als Taktik hybrider Kriegsführung missbraucht, lautet das Hauptargument der Kommission zur Rechtfertigung einer strengen Grenzpolitik, die das individuelle Asylrecht stark einschränken bzw. beseitigen kann, indem Pushback-Praktiken unter Umständen als legitim betrachtet werden können. Die Mitteilung der Kommission gibt in zweierlei Hinsicht Anlass zur Sorge. Zum einen lassen sich Bedenken mit Blick auf das Asylrecht formulieren, zum anderen – und hier steht die eigentliche Debatte noch aus – im Hinblick auf das Menschlichkeitsverbrechen des Verschwindenlassens. Continue reading >>
1 
19 February 2025
The Binoculars at the Borders of Europe
A mere two months into 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) have dealt with no less than 7 cases concerning various types of alleged pushbacks at Europe’s borders. In each of these cases rules of evidence were and remain at the forefront of effective human rights protection. This contribution highlights how the defending duty-bearing parties sought to interpret the applicable rules of evidence to evade responsibility. It further argues that failure by the Courts to meaningfully interpret these rules in light of current-day realities and the principle of effectiveness could risk eroding the absolute human rights at the core of the European legal order. Continue reading >>
0
12 February 2025
Kippt in Brüssel das individuelle Asylrecht?
Während ganz Deutschland leidenschaftlich den „Merz-Plan“ für Zurückwei-sungen an den deutschen Grenzen diskutiert, hat in Brüssel eine Grundsatz-debatte von viel größerer Tragweite begonnen. In einer spektakulären Wen-dung erachtet die EU-Kommission „Pushbacks“ unter Umständen neuerdings für rechtmäßig. Das ist heikel, weil Pushbacks an den Außengrenzen das in-dividuelle Asylrecht beseitigen. Continue reading >>30 January 2025
Feeble Recognition of a Systematic Pushback Practice
In A.R.E. v. Greece and G.R.J. v. Greece, jointly published at the beginning of 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) finally acknowledged Greece’s long-standing systematic practice of violently pushing people back at its land and sea borders. While this is already remarkable, both rulings stand out for the Court’s thorough evidentiary analysis and new standards for proving pushbacks. However, the ECtHR failed to fully incorporate the context of a systematic practice, instead maintaining a high threshold for evidencing individual instances of pushbacks. Continue reading >>
0
07 January 2025
How the EU Commission Backs up Pushbacks at the EU-Belarussian Border
In December 2024, the European Commission issued a communication to the European Parliament and the Council discussing the current situation of so-called ‘hybrid threats’ at the EU-Belarussian border. With the goal of stopping irregular arrivals of migrants and its facilitation by Belarus and Russia, the EU Commission outlines how EU primary law, namely Art. 72 TFEU, could be utilized by Member States to circumvent the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and curtail the protection afforded by fundamental rights for migrants. By advising member states to make use of this legal pathway for the current situation at the EU-Belarussian border, the EU Commission indirectly justifies the current pushback practices from Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. Continue reading >>
0
04 September 2024
Nun also doch? Zurückweisungen von Asylbewerbern aufgrund einer „Notlage“
Die Dublin-Regeln verlieren nicht deshalb ihre rechtliche Bindungswirkung, weil sie praktisch schlecht funktionieren. Im Europarecht gilt nicht das völkerrechtliche Prinzip eines „Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn“, wonach ein Land eine Verpflichtung missachten darf, weil andere Länder dasselbe machen. Zahlreiche Urteile des EuGH bekräftigen seit Jahren, dass die Dublin-Regeln trotz aller Defizite verbindlich sind. Die Politik muss Gesetze ändern, die ihr nicht gefallen. Continue reading >>25 July 2024
Restitution for Pushback Victims
Despite the trauma caused by the brutality of pushbacks, victims often attempt to return to the expelling state’s territory, driven by desperation and the search for a better life. In doing so, they risk repeated violations of their rights. This vicious circle has to be broken. As reparation for the violation of their rights, restitution allowing for their return to the territory of the state responsible for the violation should be granted. This victim-centered approach allows their primary goal of re-entry into the state territory to be achieved through legal means. Continue reading >>
0
10 May 2024
Legalising Illegality
Following Russia’s on-going facilitation of migrants to the Finnish border since last fall, Finland’s newly formed right-wing coalition government has closed the eastern land border indefinitely on 4 April 2024. Worried that this step will not be enough to ensure national security, the government is finalising a Draft Act on Temporary Measures to Combat Instrumentalised Migration, currently under revision.The draft bill allows for pushbacks in violation of non-refoulement and openly admits a conflict with Finland’s human rights obligations, EU law and own constitutional system, which is unusual. The unprecedented nature of the proposed measures is particularly worrying given that the Act appears unlikely to effectively address the essentially political problem that “migrant instrumentalisation” poses. Continue reading >>24 April 2024
Pushbacks From Europe’s Borders Enter the Mainstream
The Polish reckoning with the illiberal turn of the past years seemingly does not apply to the unlawful practice of pushbacks on the Poland-Belarus border. The unlawful practices, best exemplified by pushbacks, have come to be accepted in the European mainstream. The humanitarian crisis on the Poland-Belarus border and its handling by the new government, together with its rejection of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, vividly illustrates this point. Continue reading >>
0
02 April 2024