SUPPORT US
Helfen Sie, die Verfassung zu schützen!
Die Verfassung gerät immer mehr unter Druck. Um sie schützen zu können, brauchen wir Wissen. Dieses Wissen machen wir zugänglich. Open Access.
Wir veröffentlichen aktuelle Analysen und Kommentare. Wir stoßen Debatten an. Wir klären auf über Gefahren für die Verfassung und wie sie abgewehrt werden können. In Thüringen. Im Bund. In Europa. In der Welt.
Dafür brauchen wir Ihre Unterstützung!
Musk, Power, and the EU: Can EU Law Tackle the Challenges of Unchecked Plutocracy?
At a time when calls for the EU to respond to Musk’s actions are multiplying, the question of whether, why, and how the EU may react remains largely undefined. What makes Musk’s conduct problematic under EU law? Is it a matter of disinformation, electoral integrity, foreign influence, unprecedented market concentration, or possible abuse of power? Or is it all of the above, or a combination of these factors? This symposium intends to explore these questions through a series of brief opinion pieces.
Read all articles >>The Omnipresence of Divergent Historical Narratives in Law and Politics
The past feels omnipresent in today’s world. Wars are waged and defended in the name of history, while domestic and international politics revolve around struggles over collective memory. This symposium explores how memory laws and politics contribute to authoritarianism by restricting human rights and reinforcing other populist tools. Focusing on memory’s ties to illiberalism, foreign policy, and the digital age, the symposium, co-edited by Angelika Nußberger and Paula Rhein-Fischer, seeks to spark debate on the future viability of memory laws and politics.
Read all articles >>We Are Launching the Judicial Resilience Project
How Vulnerable Is the German Judiciary?
Continue reading >>ADVERTISEMENT
Volume 6,Issue 3
October 2024
JUS COGENS
-
ANDRE SANTOS CAMPOS
-
GÜRKAN ÇAPAR
UNSERE NEUESTE VERÖFFENTLICHUNG
Maxim Bönnemann & Maria Antonia Tigre (eds.)
The Transformation of European Climate Litigation
In Spring 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled for the first time that inadequate climate mitigation violates human rights. This book offers the first comprehensive assessment of the rulings in KlimaSeniorinnen, Duarte Agostinho, and Carême. It explores key innovations, missed opportunities, and the untaken paths in European climate litigation.
LATEST POSTS
The Binoculars at the Borders of Europe
A mere two months into 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) have dealt with no less than 7 cases concerning various types of alleged pushbacks at Europe’s borders. In each of these cases rules of evidence were and remain at the forefront of effective human rights protection. This contribution highlights how the defending duty-bearing parties sought to interpret the applicable rules of evidence to evade responsibility. It further argues that failure by the Courts to meaningfully interpret these rules in light of current-day realities and the principle of effectiveness could risk eroding the absolute human rights at the core of the European legal order.
Continue reading >>
Ein Wendepunkt für die globale Korruptionsbekämpfung
In der Kaskade aufsehenerregender Dekrete von US-Präsident Donald Trump sticht der letzte Woche verkündete Schritt, die Anwendung des Gesetzes gegen Auslandsbestechung für sechs Monate auszusetzen, auf den ersten Blick nicht heraus. Näher besehen könnte diese Executive Order aber die globale Antikorruptionspolitik unterminieren und die wirtschafts- und sicherheitspolitischen Interessen Europas nachhaltig schädigen. Zur Debatte steht mit dem Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) nämlich jenes Gesetz, mit dem die transnationale und globale Korruptionsbekämpfung im Jahr 1977 ihren Lauf nahm.
Continue reading >>
Mit Pflichtarbeit erziehen?
Der Bezug existenzsichernder Sozialleistungen gilt im politischen Diskurs als verwerflich: In einer stark vereinfachten Transferbetrachtung wird davon ausgegangen, vermeintlich in selbstverschuldeter Armut lebende Personen lebten von der Arbeit anderer. Neueste Ausprägung eines stigmatisierenden Diskurses über Sozialleistungsempfänger*innen ist es, die Arbeitspflicht für Leistungsbeziehende nach dem AsylbLG einführen bzw. ausweiten zu wollen. Solche populistischen Forderungen verkennen sowohl die verfassungsrechtlichen Grenzen als auch die fragwürdige Wirksamkeit von Arbeitsverpflichtungen.
Continue reading >>
Why Australia’s Campaign Finance Reform is Likely to Face Constitutional Challenge
After decades of gridlock on campaign finance reform at the federal level in Australia, the major parties reached a deal to pass the Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Act 2025 (Cth) on almost the last parliamentary sitting day before a forthcoming election. The new law will not take effect until after the election. It will lower the threshold for the disclosure of donations and ensure disclosures are published more quickly. It will also impose a cap on political donations and a cap on electoral expenditure. This all sounds like a great improvement for transparency and fairness in election campaigning. In theory, it is. So why and how could it be the subject of a successful constitutional challenge?
Continue reading >>
Where Is Our Outcry?
Two universities – the LMU Munich and the Freie University Berlin – cancelled events featuring Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967. Isn’t this the moment when we should finally speak up, even if we have not done so before for fear of taking a wrong step in the minefield that is the Israel/Palestine debate? Francesca Albanese is our colleague. The holder of a mandate by the Human Rights Council. A globally well-respected scholar of international law who speaks at universities around the world.
Continue reading >>The De-Regulatory Turn of the EU Commission
The current events in the US, especially the takeover of executive branches by the non-elected private citizen Elon Musk, left legal scholars and other constitutional experts in a state of shocked disbelief. From a European perspective, many consider such a development unthinkable. However, we should not be too certain about that. The current decision of the EU Commission to carry out a “de-regulatory turn” illustrates how strongly a technical innovation narrative – one that has contributed to the success of individuals like Musk and their corporate conglomerates – is catching on globally.
Continue reading >>
What Madonna Got and the EU Did Not
For the past three months, Serbian citizens have been actively protesting, demanding a shift from the rule by man to the one, governed by the rule of law. The protests followed the tragedy of November 1, 2024, when the recently renovated canopy of the railway station in Novi Sad collapsed and took 15 lives and severely injured 2 individuals. The Prime Minister has resigned, and massive protests are sweeping across the country. Meanwhile, the EU continues to prioritize regional stability over addressing the President’s abuse of power.
Continue reading >>
How the CJEU Should Supervise the Court of Arbitration for Sport
On 16 January 2025, AG Ćapeta rendered her Opinion in the Seraing case which could have profound effects for transnational governance of sports. AG Ćapeta highlights convincingly the specificities of CAS arbitration, its forced nature and peculiar private enforcement system. She concludes that CAS awards should be deprived of res judicata effect and subject to EU law review. I advocate for a less disruptive approach. Instead of a total devaluation of CAS awards, we should condition the recognition of their bindingness to their compliance with European public policy and fundamental due process rights.
Continue reading >>From Democracy to Dynastic Rule?
On January 30, 2025, the National Assembly of Nicaragua approved a constitutional reform that significantly strengthens the power of President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Vice President Rosario Murillo. The amendments profoundly transform the country’s political system, reinforcing the Executive’s influence over other branches of the state. This analysis aims to trace the political evolution of Nicaragua in order to better understand how the constitutional framework of the state is changing now.
Continue reading >>In Search of Honour
There is a presumption underlying the liberal democratic constitutional project that has been exposed by the Trump administration in its first weeks in office – that formal constitutional structures are all we need to protect against bad political actors. But our entire constitutional system hinges on the very basic idea of people in positions of power doing the right thing. Therefore, I will argue that the behavioural chink in the constitutional chain that needs to be re-discovered is honour. Honour possesses the cultural potency, political currency, and psychological impetuous we need to turn the tide on illiberalism.
Continue reading >>
Transnationale Disruption
Scheinbar hat der amerikanische Vizepräsident J. D. Vance bei seiner Rede am Freitagabend das Thema verfehlt, indem er die europäische Innenpolitik kritisierte. Es handelt sich allerdings nicht um einen diplomatischen Fauxpas, sondern um die Verkündung eines Programms an der Spitze eines transnationalen „Bewegungsstaates“. Ideologische Anleihen macht Vance bei Carl Schmitt, denkt dessen „Raumnahme“ aber im transnationalen Sinne weiter.
Continue reading >>
Vielfalt am Rande
Vom öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunk dürfen wir ein Programm erwarten, das die Grundsätze der Objektivität und Unparteilichkeit achtet und Themen- und Meinungsvielfalt möglichst breit und ausgewogen darstellt – so zumindest verlangt es § 26 Abs. 2 S. 2 MStV. Doch kann ein Sendungsformat, das als „Wahlarena“ gebrandet und kurz vor der Bundestagswahl 2025 ausgestrahlt wird, jedoch nur bestimmte Parteien berücksichtigt, diesem Vielfaltsgedanken Rechnung tragen? Ja, sagt das OVG NRW – nein, sagt der VGH Baden-Württemberg.
Continue reading >>
A Sisyphean Task?
Ethiopia finds itself at a critical juncture in its attempt to embark on a journey of confronting its violent past through a multi-prong transitional justice process. Despite notable progress in drafting the legal frameworks and the establishment of necessary institutional structures to set the wheels of transitional justice in motion, public trust in the current process remains fragile. The government's current crack down on civil society organizations and media freedom is likely to exacerbate this problem.
Continue reading >>
We Are Launching the Judicial Resilience Project
How Vulnerable Is the German Judiciary?
Continue reading >>
Der geheimnisvolle Pegasus
Die Abwägung zwischen staatlicher Geheimhaltung und Informationsrechten stellt eine zentrale Herausforderung demokratischer Rechtsstaaten dar. Das Bundesverwaltungsgericht hat kürzlich entschieden, dass der Bundesnachrichtendienst einem presserechtlichen Auskunftsanspruch zum Einsatz der Spionagesoftware „Pegasus“ nicht nachkommen muss. Diese sicherheitsorientierte Rechtsprechung ist sachgerecht, da vollständige Transparenz im Sicherheitsbereich weder praktikabel noch funktional wäre.
Continue reading >>
Rethinking Remembrance
Can commemorative practices such as memorials, museums, and national remembrance days effectively transform attitudes and behaviours to deter violence? Despite the proliferation of memorialisation practices globally, their tangible impact on reducing violence or fostering reconciliation and healing is often assumed rather than rigorously demonstrated.
Continue reading >>
Trump’s Straussian Shysters: The Scary Sequel
Nearly three years ago I wrote here about the far-right constitutional theory behind Trump lawyer John Eastman’s role in the inept yet deadly January 6, 2021 coup attempt against then President-elect Joe Biden. I described the idiosyncratic reworking by Eastman and other so-called west-coast Straussians at California’s Claremont Institute of the ideas of the German-Jewish refugee Leo Strauss, an imposing, deeply conservative political theorist, into an apology for an executive-directed counterrevolution aimed ostensibly at restoring the original US constitutional order. Little did I imagine that Strauss’ Claremont disciples would soon enjoy a political comeback, and that they would once again be wreaking constitutional havoc.
Continue reading >>Connective and Disjunctive Memory
Digital memory scholars highlight a shift to “connective memory”, which connects individuals to a multitudes of users as opposed to the memory of a collective. Additionally, the importance of forgetting has become an essential demand of participants in digital communication, which leads to the importance of understanding “disjunctive memory” as well. Undermining the hopes for progressing empathy and understanding in the digital age, its disruptive effects materialize in Russian digital media discourse in the 2020s.
Continue reading >>
Transgender Rights at a Crossroads in the United States
In his first month in office, US President Donald Trump has issued a series of sweeping executive orders targeting transgender rights. These orders build on political terrain that is now exceedingly hostile to transgender rights. In this post, I briefly examine the landscape for transgender rights in the United States, analyze what President Trump’s executive orders on transgender rights aim to do, and then discuss the stakes of United States v. Skrmetti, the pending Supreme Court case that will likely set out the framework that federal courts will use in adjudicating transgender rights cases under the Trump administration and beyond.
Continue reading >>
