Trump’s Manufactured Emergencies
The Trump administration’s actions in Washington D.C. represent the continuation of interconnected political and rhetorical tactics that the president has used since his second inauguration that we should expect to see again and again – using misleading or downright fabricated information as the basis for declaring an emergency, relying on the fabricated emergency to invoke emergency legal authorities, and then relying on those authorities to take actions that exceed even the broad powers that such emergencies confer under the law. Looking ahead, we can expect the administration to run this same playbook in additional, predictable ways.
Continue reading >>
The Next Episode On Gender-Based Asylum
One of the CJEU’s most talked-about recent cases asks a simple question: when does someone belong to a “particular social group” under EU refugee law? On 11 June 2024 in K, L v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (K, L), the CJEU found that, women who genuinely came to identify themselves with the fundamental value of equality between women and men during their stay in the host country can be regarded as belonging to a particular social group. However, the implementation of the K, L judgment has led to a divergence between national policy and national courts over the meaning of “identification with the fundamental value of equality between women and men.”
Continue reading >>
The Case for a Royal Commission on Britain and Europe
How much longer can Britain’s unstable relationship with the European Union be tolerated? While Prime Minister Keir Starmer vocally supports European unity regarding Ukraine, he denies it for his own country. Nearly ten years after the referendum, the costs of Brexit are rising, and public opinion is increasingly favouring closer ties with the EU. This post suggests that the current deadlock calls for a Royal Commission to overcome parliamentary paralysis, provide an evidence-based assessment of post-Brexit realities, and lay the groundwork for strategic decisions about the UK’s role in Europe.
Continue reading >>
Weaponising Disqualification
On August 20, 2025, the Indian Government introduced three constitutional amendment bills of massive implications in the Parliament. Together, the bills aim to establish a mandatory legal sanction providing that any minister can be removed from their ministerial office if arrested or detained for thirty consecutive days on charges carrying a potential sentence of five years or more. At first glance, the bills may seem laudatory, founded on the expectation of ethical standards for high constitutional office. Yet, one can clearly anticipate the gross impending misuse of this law towards establishing a hegemonic BJP rule in India.
Continue reading >>
Palestine Action, Proscription and Proportionality
In July, the UK government has decided to proscribe the organisation Palestine Action. The order means that people are criminalised not just for expressing support for terrorist acts, but for the proscribed organisation. As a result, over 500 people were reportedly arrested at a protest in London on 9 August. Whether the decision pushes anti-terrorism law too far and violates freedom of expression will be assessed by the courts at a later date. If the decision survives a legal challenge, it could pave the way for proscription to be used in relation to a broader range of groups in future.
Continue reading >>
Safe for Everyone?
On 1 August, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its much-anticipated judgment, addressing the interpretation of the “safe country of origin” (SCO) concept under the Asylum Procedures Directive 2013/32 (APD). Contrary to AG de la Tour, the Court firmly ruled that Member States cannot designate a country as “safe” unless it provides adequate protection to its entire population. Ultimately, the Court’s judgment effectively preserves the current protection until the EU legislator fully exercises its prerogative to amend the rules.
Continue reading >>
Klarheit für das Krankenhauswesen aus Karlsruhe?
Seit Jahren lähmt der Kompetenzkonflikt zwischen Bund und Ländern Reformen im Krankenhauswesen. Nun richten sich einige Länder mit einer abstrakten Normenkontrolle gegen Vorgaben des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zu Mindestmengen und zur Personalbesetzung. Die aufgeworfenen verfassungsrechtlichen Fragen dürften auch für die große Krankenhausreform bedeutsam sein. Es geht um den Widerspruch zwischen qualitätsfördernder Zentralisierung und flächendeckender Versorgung. Eine Leerstelle der bisherigen Diskussion sind die Grundrechte der Patient:innen.
Continue reading >>
Tariftreue light
Ein neues Bundestariftreuegesetz soll den Bund dazu verpflichten, öffentliche Aufträge nur noch an solche Auftragnehmer:innen zu vergeben, die ihren Arbeitnehmer:innen tarifliche Arbeitsbedingungen gewähren – unabhängig davon, ob sie tarifgebunden sind oder nicht. Die Diskussion ist nicht neu: Die Ampel-Koalition scheiterte, bevor ihr Entwurf verabschiedet werden konnte. Am 6. August 2025 hat sich die Regierung im Kabinett auf einen neuen Entwurf geeinigt. Der Entwurf verfolgt das richtige Ziel, ist jedoch nicht konsequent genug, um die Tarifautonomie tatsächlich zu stärken.
Continue reading >>
Eroding Independence
On 7 August 2025, India’s Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi made serious allegations of large-scale voter fraud. Examining electoral rolls covering approximately 650,000 voters in one state assembly constituency within a parliamentary constituency, Gandhi claimed that over 100,000 voters had significant irregularities that hinted at manipulation. This post does not discuss the veracity of these allegations. Rather, the goal here is to contextualise these allegations against the backdrop of a sharp decline in the independence and trustworthiness of the Election Commission of India.
Continue reading >>
(Kein) Geld für die Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung
Die AfD-nahe Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung (DES) hat beim Bundesinnenministerium (BMI) für das Haushaltsjahr 2026 einen Antrag auf staatliche Förderung in Millionenhöhe gestellt. Es spricht einiges dafür, dass er wegen des neuen Kriteriums der „Verfassungsfreundlichkeit“ gem. § 2 Abs. 4 und Abs. 5 StiftFinG erfolglos sein wird. Es bestehen allerdings erhebliche Bedenken, ob die Norm einer verfassungsgerichtlichen Kontrolle standhält und insbesondere mit dem Grundsatz der Chancengleichheit der Parteien und dem Bestimmtheitsgebot vereinbar ist.
Continue reading >>
CURRENT DEBATES
Zart im Nehmen: Das Strafrecht in Zeiten des autoritären Populismus
Strafrecht und Politik begegnen sich seit jeher in einem heiklen Spannungsfeld. Während autoritär-populistische Kräfte es als Werkzeug eines starken Staates inszenieren, ist es zugleich unverzichtbar für den Schutz der Demokratie. Doch wo es überzogen wird, droht es selbst zum Risiko für die Freiheiten zu werden, die es bewahren soll. Dieses Symposium geht der Frage nach, wie wehrhaft das Strafrecht ist und wo seine Grenzen liegen.
Read all articles >>Abusive Feminism
With the concept “Abusive Feminism”, Rosalind Dixon problematizes how anti-feminist, would-be authoritarians use feminist ideas and language to advance and legitimate their own sexist, authoritarian projects. Case studies from South Africa, Argentina, Poland, Italy, Brazil, and South Asia offer powerful examples of the phenomenon, deepen our understanding of its roots, and point to counterstrategies.
Read all articles >>ADVERTISEMENT
Volume 7,Issue 2
July 2025
JUS COGENS
-
Killing Hitler Word by Word: The Oath as Apocalyptic Lawmaking
GREGOR NOLL
-
Adjudicating Climate Protest as a Tool of Modern Republicanism
DMITRII KUZNETSOV
OUR LATEST PUBLICATION
Anmol Jain & Tanja Herklotz (eds.)
Indian Constitutionalism at Crossroads: 2014-2024
Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has governed India since 2014, marking a decade of challenges to various aspects of India’s democracy and constitutional system. While the last decade may not have left many conspicuous signs textually, the soul of India’s constitutional system has suffered several dents. The ruling government has launched, quite successfully, a project of redefining India, its constitutional identity, and its vision. This edited volume explores these multifaceted challenges and assesses the current state of Indian Constitutionalism.
PROJECTS
VB Security and Crime
In cooperation with:
VB Security and Crime is a cooperation of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (MPI-CSL) and the Verfassungsblog in the areas of public security law and criminal law. The MPI-CSL Institute is a member of the Max Planck Law network.
Das Justiz-Projekt
Weltweit gerät die unabhängige und unparteiische Justiz unter den Druck des autoritären Populismus.
Wie verwundbar ist die rechtsprechende Gewalt in Deutschland – im Bund und in den Ländern?
VB Security and Crime
In cooperation with:
VB Security and Crime is a cooperation of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (MPI-CSL) and the Verfassungsblog in the areas of public security law and criminal law. The MPI-CSL Institute is a member of the Max Planck Law network.