15 Februar 2012

A Rescue Package For Fundamental Rights: An Online Symposium on Verfassungsblog

The constitution of the European Union depends on the fundamental rights situation in EU Member States. Hungary is the latest and most grave example of a EU Member State whose fundamental rights deficiencies are cause for concern.

What can the Union do about it? What if treaty violation procedures and political pressure won’t do to get the situation under control? At which point ceases  the problem to be an “internal” issue – in law, in politics? And how can the trap of  massive centralization in the EU be avoided, if one broadens the scope of Union-level fundamental rights protection with the CJEU as the supreme guardian?

A research team led by Armin von Bogdandy, director of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg, has taken up these salient questions in a  report commissioned by  the German Foreign Office. The authors present  a strikingly systematic proposal that may have far-reaching consequences:The European Court of Justice ought to declare itself competent to protect the fundamental rights of Union citizens even against their own state, if and as long as the national court system in the respective  Member State cannot or will not sufficiently protect the “essence” of fundamental rights.

We have asked Armin von Bogdandy, Matthias Kottmann, Carlino Antpöhler, Johanna Dickschen, Simon Hentrei, and Maja Smrkolj to present and discuss their proposal on Verfassungsblog. Verfassungsblog is a space of possibilities and opportunities: lecture hall and salon, agora and court room, newsroom and laboratory to experiment with ideas and arguments. A space to debate the constitution of Europe – and the future of our constitution, to discuss the world and the law.

Last december, we already experimented with the format of an online symposium, on the occasion of the EU fiscal pact. Now, we want to take this experience a step further and to enlarge our virtual discursive space: Starting today, a group of  distinguished  scholars will comment on the Heidelberg proposal. A constitutional lawyer from Budapest, a political scientist teaching at Hamburg University and a legal historian and public law expert from Frankfurt’s Goethe University are our pioneers to start the debate. And this is just the beginning. We do invite our readers to let themselves be seduced by smart and provocative posts and comments, and to comment and share their own thoughts as authors. And we shall be delighted to receive additional submissions by knowledgeable experts.

Symposiusm contributions will be published in German or in English, and often in both languages. Verfassungsblog takes on the challenges of linguistic diversity. How to deal with linguistic diversity? As of yet, we could not  come up with a clean and clear-cut solution, or even any kind of proper solution. But we are working on it.

We are looking forward to a lively and exciting debate!

Alexandra Kemmerer

Christoph Möllers

Max Steinbeis


SUGGESTED CITATION  Steinbeis, Maximilian: A Rescue Package For Fundamental Rights: An Online Symposium on Verfassungsblog, VerfBlog, 2012/2/15, https://verfassungsblog.de/a-rescue-package-for-fundamental-rights-an-online-symposium-on-verfassungsblog/, DOI: 10.17176/20181008-114307-0.

Leave A Comment

WRITE A COMMENT

1. We welcome your comments but you do so as our guest. Please note that we will exercise our property rights to make sure that Verfassungsblog remains a safe and attractive place for everyone. Your comment will not appear immediately but will be moderated by us. Just as with posts, we make a choice. That means not all submitted comments will be published.

2. We expect comments to be matter-of-fact, on-topic and free of sarcasm, innuendo and ad personam arguments.

3. Racist, sexist and otherwise discriminatory comments will not be published.

4. Comments under pseudonym are allowed but a valid email address is obligatory. The use of more than one pseudonym is not allowed.





No Comments Join the discussion