Search
Generic filters
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Maxim Bönnemann

Maxim Bönnemann is a Senior Editor at Verfassungsblog.
ORCiD >>
POSTS BY Maxim Bonnemann
13 December 2024
,

“It looks more like a managed transition than a revolution.”

Five Questions to Michael Meyer-Resende Continue reading >>
0
13 December 2024
,

„Zur Zeit sieht es mehr wie ein geordneter Übergang aus, nicht wie eine Revolution.“

Fünf Fragen an Michael Meyer-Resende Continue reading >>
0
07 December 2024
, , ,

„Das IGH-Gutachten könnte die globale Klimagovernance grundlegend ändern.“

Fünf Fragen an Tejas Rao, Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Markus Gehring Continue reading >>
0
07 December 2024
, , ,

“The Advisory Opinion Could Reshape Global Climate Governance.”

Five Questions to Tejas Rao, Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Markus Gehring Continue reading >>
0
18 October 2024
,

„Es gibt nur eine moralisch, rechtlich und strategisch vertretbare Antwort: ein Waffenembargo“

Fünf Fragen an Janina Dill Continue reading >>
3
18 October 2024
,

“There is only one morally, legally and strategically defensible choice: an arms embargo”

Five Questions to Janina Dill Continue reading >>
1
12 October 2024
, ,

Navigating Darkness

On the relational potential of legal discourse Continue reading >>
0
12 October 2024
, ,

Durch die Dunkelheit

Das Verbindende des Rechts Continue reading >>
0
22 May 2024
,

The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Climate Change

On May 21, 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) delivered a long-awaited Advisory Opinion on climate change and international law. This marks the first time that an international tribunal has issued an advisory opinion on State obligations regarding climate change mitigation. The Advisory Opinion addresses several key questions regarding application of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in the context of climate change. There is much to explore in terms of both the content of the ITLOS advisory opinion and its potential implications for global, regional, and local efforts to combat climate change. To facilitate discussion and the exchange of ideas, the Sabin Center's Climate Law Blog and Verfassungsblog are partnering on a blog symposium on the ITLOS opinion. In this first, introductory blog, we outline the background to the advisory opinion and highlight some of the key takeaways from it. Continue reading >>
0
09 April 2024
,

The Transformation of European Climate Change Litigation

In a transformative moment for European and global climate litigation, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled today that the state has a positive duty to adopt, and effectively implement in practice, regulations and measures capable of mitigating the existing and potentially irreversible future effects of climate change. In Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland (“KlimaSeniorinnen”), the Court held that by failing to put in place a domestic regulatory framework for climate change mitigation, the Swiss government violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the right to respect for private and family life. The judgment is a milestone for human rights protection. Continue reading >>
3
Go to Top