14 January 2026
Keeping Up with Changing Times
The Venice Commission’s Rule of Law Checklist is one of the most influential soft-law instruments for assessing constitutional governance in Europe and beyond. In December 2025, this comprehensive framework has recently undergone a significant update. The revised text reframes the rule of law in light of new challenges. The result is a complex document that captures the defining features of today’s digital constitutionalism, where constitutional democracies and human rights are not only threatened by public authorities, but also by private actors governing spaces which are formally private but practically functioning as public squares. Continue reading >>
0 
04 January 2026
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
The Court of Justice’s judgments in W.S. et al and Hamoudi mark an important shift in accountability at Europe’s borders. The Court made clear that Frontex cannot evade judicial responsibility for fundamental rights violations. The rulings lower evidentiary hurdles for victims of deportations and pushbacks and underscore that remedies against EU agencies must work in practice. Taken together, the cases push back against Frontex’s long-standing structural irresponsibility and reaffirm the rule of law in EU asylum governance. Continue reading >>
0
20 December 2025
The CJEU Versus the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland
On 18 December 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down a momentous judgment, in which it found that the Constitutional Tribunal (CT) of Poland does not satisfy the requirements of an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The Court also found that through the decisions of that Tribunal Poland had failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty of European Union, as well as under the general principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law. Continue reading >>18 December 2025
The Sanctioning of Law
Imagine a Western head of government sanctioning the attorney general and judges of the supreme court because they have brought criminal proceedings against his party colleagues. He has their assets seized, their bank accounts frozen, and their freedom of movement restricted. Unimaginable? Unfortunately, no. This is precisely what the Trump administration has now done with the leadership of the Office of the Prosecutor and six judges of the International Criminal Court. Continue reading >>18 December 2025
Judging Independence
On Monday, the European Court of Human Rights held in Danileț v. Romania that judges in principle cannot be disciplined for publicly defending the constitutional order. Coinciding with the early December 2025 reports exposing corruption and sustained pressure on the Romanian judiciary, the Grand Chamber’s judgment could not have arrived at a more timely moment. Danileț is an important moment for Romania’s judiciary and a reminder that courts must be able to speak – and be heard – when democracy and the rule of law are under threat. Continue reading >>16 December 2025
Populism Is Here to Stay
Following the presidential defeat of his preferred candidate in June 2025, Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a former president of the European Council, recalibrated – or, more precisely, intensified – his strategy of imitating illiberal political forces, to the extent that his political rhetoric could easily be now mistaken for Orbán’s. What are the implications of this troubling development for what is, in fact, at least in the recent European context, a Polish speciality: the process of democratic restoration? Continue reading >>03 December 2025
Taiwan’s Constitutional Grey Hole
Since late 2024, the Taiwan Constitutional Court has been unable to issue merits-based decisions. The Court is neither resolving separation-of-powers disputes between the executive and legislature nor providing fundamental rights protection for individuals. This institutional deadlock constitutes a constitutional “grey hole”, where only the form of the legal order exists, without any substantive protections. All proposed solutions carry limitations, and some may even exacerbate rather than alleviate the problem. Continue reading >>
0
20 October 2025
Avoiding Too Little Too Late
It may seem counterintuitive, in the political chaos and noise of 2025, and in the face of widespread disengagement with international law and the different components of the post-war rules-based order, to turn to the nitty gritty of case management, interim measures and procedures. However, the best defense which international courts can mount at present is to do well that for which they were established. Continue reading >>
0
17 October 2025
Neutralising the Captured Court
In September 2025, the CJEU ruled in the AW ‘T’ (C-225/22) case on the status of decisions issued by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control. Already in its previous case law, in L.G. v KRS, the Court found preliminary references from that Chamber to be inadmissible. Moreover, in the W.Ż. case, the Court had already considered certain decisions as “null and void” under certain conditions. However, the new AW ‘T’ case broadens the applicability of the “null and void” sanctions which will be of great importance for the Polish efforts to address the consequences of the rule of law crisis. Continue reading >>
0