24 May 2020
Der biologische Essentialismus hinter „lediglich empfundener Intersexualität“
Das Recht lebt von Kategorisierungen. Kategorisierungen wiederum implizieren Begrenzungen, sogar gewaltsame Begrenzungen. Der aktuelle Beschluss des Bundesgerichtshofs zur „lediglich empfundenen Intersexualität“ bringt dies besonders deutlich zum Vorschein: Die scheinbar rechtstechnische Frage nach der anwendbaren Norm für die Änderung oder Löschung eines personenstandsrechtlichen Geschlechtseintrags entpuppt sich als zutiefst politisch. An ihr kristallisieren sich grundlegende Fragen zu Geschlechterverständnissen, zu Körperlichkeit, und zu Selbst- und Fremdbestimmung. Continue reading >>
9 
24 August 2018
New German Intersex Law: Third Gender but not as we want it
The new German draft law to introduce a third option in personal status law has overwhelmingly been decried as a missed historical opportunity, or even as counterproductive, for a variety of reasons. The main criticisms are that the third option does not fully recognize gender diversity as it will only be available to those with a medical diagnosis of an intersex condition, and that the government failed to genuinely consider the alternative option presented by the Constitutional Court – that of scrapping sex/gender registration altogether. Continue reading >>13 April 2017
Stopping forced sterilisation is not enough – the limitations of the recent ECHR judgement on trans rights
The recent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in A.P., Garçon and Nicot v. France constitutes an important decision for trans rights in many ways. The ECtHR determined that France’s requirement of sterilisation, applying to persons wishing to legally change their names and gender on their birth certificate to reflect their gender identity, is a violation of the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Continue reading >>
0