12 April 2022
Anything Goes?
Last month, the ECtHR ruled in the case of Johansen v. Denmark on the deprivation of nationality and expulsion for terrorist offenses. It rejected the applicant’s complaint of an infringement of Art. 8 ECHR. The decision underlines the Court’s reluctance to engage with issues raised by deprivations of nationality in terrorism cases. Instead of setting out clear limits on such measures based on the rights guaranteed by the Convention, the Court does not seem to be willing to interfere with measures related to national security, no matter how drastic the consequences for the individual. Continue reading >>
0 
07 November 2021
Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusbekämpfung als Mittel zur Migrationskontrolle
Seit den Anschlägen vom 11. September ist der öffentliche Diskurs [...] Continue reading >>
0
23 November 2020
Von der Ausnahme zum Alltäglichen
Das Sicherheitsrecht gilt als ebenso dynamisches wie instabiles Rechtsgebiet. Ein Grund hierfür ist, dass Sicherheitsgesetzgebung häufig anlassbezogen ist und auf Einzelereignisse reagiert. Die Spuren des Terroranschlags in Wien am 2.11.2020 waren kaum beseitigt, da legten sowohl die Österreichische Bundesregierung als auch die Europäische Kommission Entwürfe für neue Anti-Terror-Pakete vor. Beide Pakete sind weitere Bausteine einer Gesetzgebung, die auf konkrete Anlässe mit allgemeinen Gesetzen reagiert und auf diese Weise das Außergewöhnliche verallgemeinert, während das Normale denormalisiert wird. Continue reading >>
0
22 May 2019
Unfinished Business for the European Parliament: The EU Terrorist Content Regulation
A new EU Regulation aims to prevent online platforms from being abused to spread terrorist content. Unfortunately, the misguided draft gravely threatens freedom of expression. It is up to the newly elected European Parliament to do necessary damage control. Continue reading >>
0
30 January 2019
The EU Regulation on Terrorist Content: An Emperor without Clothes
The draft EU Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online constitutes a grave threat to freedom of expression. It could be applied in respect of journalists, non-governmental organisations, political parties, trade unions, indigenous peoples, scholars of history or social sciences, novelists, cartoonists, photographers and filmmakers. Its cross-border application makes it a dreadful tool in the hands of authoritarian regimes or rogue officials. Continue reading >>
0
13 June 2018
“Academics for Peace“ and their Freedom of Expression
The ‘Academics for Peace Petition’, published in January 2016, was signed by around two thousand academics from both Turkey and from abroad. The petition raised concerns, using strong language, about the conduct of Turkish security forces in their counter-terrorism operations carried out in response to violent actions by the PKK terrorist group and their supporters in south-east Turkey in the summer of 2015. One signatory, Füsun Üstel, professor of political science, was found guilty of committing the crime of terrorist propaganda under Article 7(2) of the Turkish Counter Terrorism Law and now faces fifteen months of imprisonment. The constitutional protection of Üstel’s freedom of expression has not been respected by the court in its judicial reasoning. Continue reading >>13 September 2016
Straßburg lockert Fair-Trial-Gebot bei Terrorverdächtigen
Die Polizei kann Terrorverdächtige im Einzelfall auch ohne anwaltlichen Beistand verhören, ohne dass die dabei gewonnenen Aussagen im Strafprozess unverwertbar werden. Hauptsache, so der EGMR, dem Gebot des fairen Prozesses sei in einer holistischen Gesamtschau genüge getan. Continue reading >>12 July 2016
Between the Scylla of Terrorism and the Charybdis of the Police State: on the new French Anti-Terrorist Legislation
One month ago, France has enacted a new anti-terror law to end the state of emergency that had been in place since the terror attacks of Nov 15 2015. The basic purpose of the law is quite clearly to empower the executive (police and prosecution services) with investigative tools formerly reserved to the judiciary. Whether such a transfer of powers is justified or not, the fact is that the “country of human rights” actually now has today the most authoritarian anti-terrorist legislation in the European Union. Continue reading >>21 April 2016
Bundesverfassungsgericht kippt BKA-Gesetz: Ein Pyrrhus-Sieg der Freiheitsrechte?
Datenschutz, Privatsphäre und Freiheit haben konkret gewonnen, aber generell verloren: Warum die gestrige Grundsatzentscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in Sachen BKA-Gesetz kein ungetrübter Grund zur Freude ist. Continue reading >>22 March 2016