21 January 2020
Urban Citizenship Threatens Democratic Equality
It seems urgent that “urban citizenship” is properly characterised to understand not only the rights and responsibilities citizens of cities may well have, but also their grounding. I have no quarrel with this project. However, so far, accounts of urban citizenship – like Rainer Bauböck’s in the piece that launched this forum – do too little to consider the citizenship that is “left over” for those who do not, or cannot, move to cities. Continue reading >>
0 
21 January 2020
City-zenship and national citizenship: complementary and competing but not emancipated from each other
Nir Barak deepens the ambivalence in Rainer Bauböck’s account of urban citizenship and suggests a skeptical but friendly critique towards notions of emancipating urban citizenship from nationality. The relationship between urban and national citizenship should not be seen as mutually exclusive; claims for enhancing city-zenship and decentralizing state power are warranted only insofar as they provide forward-thinking urban response to the decline in democratic participation and civic solidarity at national levels. Continue reading >>
0
20 January 2020
Thinking Like a City, Thinking Like a State
The city is not only a "densely populated area of continuous settlement, which is organized as a single jurisdiction" (an often used formal definition of a city); the city is also a state of mind, a certain political and social consciousness. Continue reading >>
0
20 January 2020
Cities vs States: Should Urban Citizenship be Emancipated from Nationality?
Since the first decade of the millennium – for the first time in human history – more people are living in urban areas than in rural ones. According to UN projections, in 2050 the share of urban populations could rise to more than two thirds of the world population. Will this demographic change also lead to a decline of nation-states and a rise of cities as the dominant arenas of politics, democracy and citizenship? Continue reading >>
0
21 July 2019
A Judge Born in the USSR
The Sofia City Court which is notorious for its corruption is currently dealing with its latest scandal which involves the citizenship of the court’s President Alexey Trifonov. There are rising concerns that he is not a Bulgarian citizen – holding Bulgarian citizenship, however, is a requirement to serve as a magistrate in Bulgaria. The answer to a question, which appears to be simple at first glance – what is judge Trifonov’s citizenship? – requires the study of USSR and Bulgarian citizenship law applicable in 1972. The issue has already reached Bulgaria’s Supreme Administrative Court and illustrates the deplorable state of Bulgaria’s rule of law. Continue reading >>25 June 2019
Where Citizenship Law and Data Protection Law Converge
Becoming a citizen of a country is a noteworthy event. But in light of increasing concerns over the protection of personal data, states face questions regarding the necessity of formal publication of the personal data of their new citizens. A closer look at Member States' practices reveals radical discrepancies between the national approaches taken across the EU. Continue reading >>
0
24 June 2019
„Mama Laudaaa“: der Sommerhit des deutschen Migrationsrechtsdiskurses
Während die Sommerferien und die Hitzewelle den Großteil der Bevölkerung in die Badeseen und Freibäder treiben, herrscht in Migrationsrechtskreisen wieder einmal helle Aufregung. Dieses Mal scheint der liberale Verfassungsstaat zu eruieren, weil der Bundestag sich anschickt, einige kleinere Änderungen des Staatsangehörigkeitsrechts zu beschließen. Astrid Wallrabenstein warnte an dieser Stelle kürzlich vor einem „Paradigmenwechsel“. In diesem Blogbeitrag geht es mir um eine inhaltliche Replik auf ihren Beitrag und die Logik des migrationsrechtlichen Diskurses. Continue reading >>22 June 2019
Die Egalisierungsfunktion der Staatsangehörigkeit
Der Entwurf der Bundesregierung zur Änderung des Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetzes sieht die Ausbürgerung von Deutschen vor, die sich an Kampfhandlungen einer Terrormiliz im Ausland konkret beteiligen. Dies gilt freilich nur für Mehrstaater und bringt damit einen fundamentalen Paradigmenwechsel zum Ausdruck: die Staatsangehörigkeit verliert ihre grundlegende staatsrechtliche Funktion, die darin besteht, Menschen als gleiche Staatsbürger des politisch verfassten Gemeinwesens zu verstehen. So wichtig es ist, dass die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Terrorismus effektiv bekämpft, so wenig darf sie dabei einen Unterschied nach der Staatsangehörigkeit machen. Continue reading >>20 June 2019
The Citizen, the Tyrant, and the Tyranny of Patterns
Good citizenship cannot be captured or fixed by an algorithm, because: (1) people genuinely disagree about what good citizenship is; (2) there are limits to how any conception of good citizenship can be enforced in states that uphold the rule-of-law; and (3) even the best scheme of algorithmic citizenship would fail to achieve its objectives due to the inherent weaknesses of applying algorithms to social affairs. Continue reading >>
0
16 June 2019