06 June 2025
Migrant “Instrumentalisation” before the ICJ
On 19 May, Lithuania introduced proceedings against Belarus before the International Court of Justice for the alleged smuggling of migrants. Lithuania claims that Belarus violated provisions of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, which supplements the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. This blog will detail several difficulties with Lithuania’s argument which seeks to collapse key differences between migrant smuggling and the practice of migrant “instrumentalisation”. Continue reading >>
0 
Using Immigration Court as a Trap
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has begun apprehending noncitizens at immigration court – where individuals appear to seek humanitarian relief or defend against deportation – immediately after the government moves to dismiss their case. Immigrants and their attorneys are increasingly reporting that ICE, in coordination with government lawyers, is detaining individuals as they exit court following such dismissals. Rather than providing a reprieve, dismissal is now being used to facilitate detention and potentially summary deportation, raising serious concerns about due process and adherence to governing statutes in the United States. Continue reading >>
0
Sleeping on Bills
In a landmark judgment from April 2025, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that gubernatorial inaction is unconstitutional. Responding to the Governor of Tamil Nadu’s failure to act on ten bills, the Court declared such inaction “illegal” and reasserted limits to gubernatorial discretion. It not only imposed a timeframe for assent but also used its extraordinary powers to deem the bills passed. Continue reading >>
0
A New Look at Confiscating Russian Assets
In the near future, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) may issue its first compensation awards against Russia for its conduct in the war in Ukraine. When that happens, the question of how to enforce such awards will become paramount. Given Russia’s lack of cooperation, claimants may seek to enforce compensation awards in third states holding Russian assets, a promising yet untested avenue. Drawing from a recent report by Open Society Justice Initiative (OSJI), this post explores some of the legal hurdles this avenue entails as well as some of its broader implications. We believe that this approach could be a limited but significant instrument to redress harm for victims of human rights abuse committed in the war. Continue reading >>
0
“For the Sole Reason of Being Born Mixed-Race”
Where there is a will, there is a way. This phrase could sum up the logic behind the recent judgment of the Brussels Court of Appeal which condemned the Belgian government to compensate for the damage resulting from the abduction and racial segregation of children of white fathers and Black mothers during its colonisation of the Congo. The judgment sets a historic precedent: it is the first time that a domestic Court has ordered the government to pay financial compensation for acts that could have had amounted to crimes against humanity during its colonial past. Continue reading >>
0
05 June 2025
Asylwende mit Hindernissen
Um die „Asylwende" zu erreichen, wurde im Kabinett nun beschlossen, dass der Familiennachzug bei Fällen subsidiären Schutzes ausgesetzt werden soll. Auch soll die Bundesregierung künftig per Rechtsverordnung „sichere Herkunftsländer" bestimmen können. Während die Aussetzung des Familiennachzugs von einem de facto und de jure unzutreffenden Verständnis des subsidiären Schutzes ausgeht, drohen bei der Einstufung von „sicheren Herkunftsstaaten“ per Rechtsverordnung Intransparenz und mangelhafte Begründung. Continue reading >>
0
It’s Not a Trap
Despite most countries having trouble getting rid of bribery in daily life, only few so far have dared integrity testing: sending out undercover testers disguised as ordinary citizens to contact the public administration and check which public employees ask for bribes. The main argument against such undercover tests has been that they constitute “entrapment”. However, in Cavca, the ECtHR finally dispels the myth that these tests in and of themselves equal entrapment. Yet, the decision leaves one key question unaddressed: Just when does integrity testing become entrapment? Continue reading >>
0
Populism over Principle
As EU officials arrive in Sofia to celebrate Bulgaria’s readiness for euro adoption, nationalist-fueled protests erupt in the streets. The tensions were triggered by President Rumen Radev’s unexpected call for a referendum on whether the country should join the euro on 1 January 2026 – despite Bulgaria having met all convergence criteria after years of effort. Far from a genuine democratic impulse, the move appears to be a populist gamble, trading legal commitments and European credibility for short-term political gain. Continue reading >>Behind Bars, Beyond Rights
The European Court of Human Rights has quietly endorsed a troubling new practice: denying prisoners access to information based solely on format, not content. In Tergek v. Türkiye, the Court upheld a ban on photocopies and printouts, deferring to vague security concerns. Read alongside Yasak, the judgment signals a broader shift away from rigorous rights protection toward deference to state narratives. If this trend continues, the Convention's core promise — to make rights practical and effective — stands on increasingly shaky ground. Continue reading >>
0
04 June 2025
Eine Lagune im Gerichtssaal?
Die Debatte über Rechte der Natur hat auch in Deutschland an Fahrt gewonnen – nur die Strafrechtswissenschaft hat sie noch nicht erreicht. Dabei wäre eine solche Auseinandersetzung auch aus praktischen Gründen erforderlich: Nachdem Spanien im November 2022 das Ley 19/2022 verabschiedet hatte, wird sich in laufenden Strafverfahren nun erstmals entscheiden, ob das Rechtssubjekt Mar Menor vor Gericht auftreten kann. In diesem Beitrag entfalte ich die These, dass die Lagune über eine „acusación particular“ zur strafprozessualen Beteiligten werden kann: vertreten, aber in eigenem Namen. Continue reading >>Genocide in Gaza?
“Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” This was the claim raised by South Africa before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague just two and a half months after Hamas' large-scale terrorist attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. South Africa alleges that Israel's military counteroffensive is not (primarily) directed against Hamas, but rather aims to destroy the group of Palestinians in Gaza as such. This accusation carries significant political and legal weight. However, proving the necessary intent to destroy is difficult; it should not be accepted lightly. At any rate, as Israel's warfare continues and becomes increasingly brutal, the evidence for genocide is mounting. Continue reading >>Endlich gleiches Recht für alle?
Mit der Ankündigung eines Haftbefehls gegen den israelischen Premierminister hat IStGH-Chefankläger Karim Khan den lange bestehenden Vorwurf selektiver Strafverfolgung offen aufgegriffen. Die internationale Strafjustiz steht vor der Herausforderung, ihre Maßstäbe zu schärfen und ihre Legitimität zu festigen. Das geplante Ukraine-Tribunal lenkt den Blick auf bestehende Asymmetrien – und auf das Potenzial für strukturelle Reformen. Ob daraus ein tatsächlicher Wandel erwächst, ist noch ungewiss. Doch der Anspruch auf Kohärenz im internationalen Strafrecht lässt sich nicht länger übergehen. Continue reading >>
0
03 June 2025
The Questionable Concept of Protective Weapons
On 20 May 2025, the European Court of Human Rights handed down a landmark ruling in Russ v. Germany, finding that penalising a protester for wearing a makeshift visor breached his freedom of assembly. With its clear rejection of the German courts’ blanket approach, Strasbourg echoes long-standing constitutional concerns in German legal scholarship over the criminalisation of defensive gear at protests. Beyond Germany, the judgment affirms the Court’s role in shielding democratic participation across Europe. Continue reading >>
0
Zurückweisungen vor Gericht
Das Verwaltungsgericht Berlin hat mit Beschluss vom 2.6.2025 im Eilverfahren entschieden, dass drei Asylsuchenden der Grenzübertritt nach Deutschland zu gestatten ist, um im Anschluss ein Dublin-Verfahren durchzuführen. Der Beschluss bestätigt die herrschende Auffassung in der Wissenschaft: Zurückweisungen an der Grenze sind europarechtswidrig. Auch eine Notlage wurde nicht substanziell begründet. An der jetzigen Praxis festzuhalten ist daher inakzeptabel. Continue reading >>Trump’s Threat to Nonprofits
The administration of President Trump is threatening nonprofits with the loss of tax-exempt status in an attempt to force them to conform their activities to policies favored by that administration. The threats are based on shaky legal grounds, and nonprofits have both constitutional and statutory bases for countering them. Nevertheless, these threats are significant, especially when combined with the administration’s efforts to cut government funding for many programs operated by nonprofits. And at the same time, the U.S. Congress is considering reducing the benefits of tax-exempt status in many ways, primarily to help pay for tax cuts benefitting wealthy individuals and corporations. Continue reading >>
0
Slovakia’s Electoral Reform at a Crossroads
On May 21st and 22nd 2025, Prime Minister Robert Fico and Interior Minister Matúš Šutaj Eštok presented a series of proposals for substantial changes to Slovakia’s electoral system. The opposition swiftly criticized the plans as a threat to democratic governance. While the proposals differ in the severity of their constitutional and political implications, the most troubling is the significant increase in electoral deposits, which risks entrenching structural barriers to participation. In the context of Fico’s recent public rejection of liberal democracy and praise for one-party regimes, these reforms warrant close scrutiny – if not alarm. Continue reading >>
0
02 June 2025
Assoziierungsabkommen und Völkerrechtsverstöße
Am 20. Mai 2025 haben 17 der 27 Außenminister der EU-Mitgliedstaaten dafür gestimmt, das Assoziierungsabkommen mit Israel durch die EU-Kommission aufgrund der Vorgänge in Gaza überprüfen oder auszusetzen zu lassen. Bereits vorher gab es vergleichbare Äußerungen des ehemaligen Hohen Vertreters für die Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik. Diese Situationen werfen erneut die Frage auf, ob und wie die EU auf Rechtsverletzungen von Vertragspartnern zu reagieren hat. Auch wenn der Union diesbezüglich ein weiter Spielraum zukommt: untätig bleiben darf sie bei schweren Völkerrechtsverstößen nicht. Continue reading >>
0
A Tarnished Institution from Its Start
June 1st was a historical day for Mexico. The Mexican people – or, more precisely, around 13% of the electorate – went to the ballots to democratically elect their judges for the first time. The newly elected 2681 public officials, which will be announced in the following weeks, will serve in the local and federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court, and solve all types of disputes. While MORENA promises that the amendment will grant Mexico a reinvigorated judicial branch, it is instead getting a newly elected judiciary whose legitimacy has been tarnished from its very start. Continue reading >>What Are Human Rights For?
The Danish-Italian public letter to the European Court of Human Rights from 22 May 2025 must be understood in the context of two decades of “crises” in the European human rights regime. None of it is new or unprecedented. What makes it truly troubling, however, is the changed geopolitical context and the focus on migrants and asylum seekers as the most vulnerable. Continue reading >>
0
Peace at What Price?
In recent months, a growing number of voices – from political figures such as U.S. President Donald Trump and Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico to various public opinion polls – have suggested that a resolution to the war in Ukraine may require Kyiv to cede some of its territory to Russia. These arguments, now gaining renewed attention as peace talks have begun, frame territorial concessions as a pragmatic step toward ending the conflict. Ceding Ukrainian land under these conditions, however, would reward historical revisionism as a geopolitical strategy and set a dangerous precedent in international law. Continue reading >>
0
01 June 2025
Success Without Victory
One of the most striking climate cases has come to a striking end. The Higher Regional Court of Hamm dismissed the lawsuit against RWE on minor factual grounds – yet at the same time confirmed that major emitters can, in principle, be held liable under German private law for climate-related harms. The ruling may ultimately represent a success without victory: A short-term loss for the plaintiff, but one that provides important insights and strategic lessons for future climate liability cases. Continue reading >>
0
30 May 2025
Another Thread in the Spider Web
On April 14, 2025, the Hungarian parliament passed the 15th Amendment to the Fundamental Law, including new provisions allowing for the suspension of citizenship. Alongside the newly introduced Citizenship Suspension Law, the framework’s vague and expansive criteria provide the government with a powerful instrument to strip political opponents of their right to vote ahead of the 2026 parliamentary election - despite official claims to the contrary. Continue reading >>
0
Challenging Strasbourg
Since 22 May 2025, a disquieting letter has been circulating: nine leading EU politicians are calling for “a new and open-minded conversation about the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights,” with particular reference to migration. The signatories seek to explore whether “the Court, in some cases, has extended the scope of the Convention on Human Rights too far compared with the original intentions behind the Convention, thus shifting the balance between the interests that should be protected.” The letter raises not only political and ethical questions but also significant legal concerns. Continue reading >>Erfolgreich gescheitert
Einer der spektakulärsten Klimahaftungsprozesse hat ein ebenso spektakuläres Ende gefunden: Das OLG Hamm hat die Klimaklage gegen RWE abgewiesen – und gleichzeitig klargestellt, dass Großemittenten grundsätzlich für Klimaschäden zivilrechtlich haftbar gemacht werden können. Das Urteil dürfte damit auf einen Fall von „success without victory“ hinauslaufen: Obwohl es kurzfristig eine Niederlage für den Kläger bedeutet, hält es für künftige Klimahaftungsklagen wertvolle Lektionen bereit. Continue reading >>
0
28 May 2025
A Blow to Our Constitutional System
A little-noticed Supreme Court order may pave the way for a dramatic expansion of presidential authority—overturning a 90-year-old precedent and weakening the independence of key regulatory agencies. In the hands of a would-be autocrat, the Supreme Court decision has delivered a serious blow to the constitutional system. Continue reading >>
0
Genozid in Gaza?
Israel begehe in Gaza einen Völkermord. Diesen Vorwurf trug Südafrika bereits rund zweieinhalb Monate nach dem großangelegten Terroranschlag der Hamas auf Israel vor dem Internationalen Gerichtshof (IGH) in Den Haag vor. Die militärische Gegenoffensive Israels richte sich nicht (primär) gegen die Hamas, sondern ziele darauf ab, die Gruppe der Palästinenser als solche zu zerstören. Dieser Vorwurf wiegt politisch wie rechtlich schwer. Die hierfür notwendige Zerstörungsabsicht ist nur schwer nachzuweisen und darf nicht vorschnell bejaht werden. Mit zunehmender Dauer und Brutalisierung der israelischen Kriegsführung verdichten sich jedoch die Indizien für das Vorliegen eines Genozids. Continue reading >>Versammlungsfreiheit auch mit Plastikvisier
Wer sich bei Demonstrationen vor Verletzungen schützen will, macht sich in Deutschland strafbar. Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte hat dem nun menschenrechtliche Grenzen gesetzt. Sein Urteil fordert ein Umdenken bei deutschen Behörden, Polizei sowie Gerichten und rückt den Schutz der Demonstrierenden ins Zentrum der Versammlungsfreiheit. Continue reading >>27 May 2025
Challenging Safe Access
Safe Access Zones (SAZ) in Great Britain, in force since autumn 2024, establish protective areas around abortion service providers and criminalise specific behaviours within these zones. However, ongoing anti-abortion protests raise questions about the practical enforceability of the new laws. This article examines whether SAZ laws can withstand these challenges and argues that they succeed in striking a fair balance between the rights of anti-abortion demonstrators and pregnant persons seeking access to lawful abortion services under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Continue reading >>
0
Dismantling Jus Soli
The principle of jus soli has been progressively dismantled in France through the tightening of conditions governing access to French nationality in Mayotte—the 101st department of the Republic and an archipelago in the Comoros located in the Indian Ocean. This restrictive approach was reinforced by the adoption, on 9 April 2025, of a new legislative measure designed to further limit access to birthright citizenship. The Conseil constitutionnel upheld the constitutionality of the contested provisions in its decision of 7 May 2025. Continue reading >>Georgia’s Foreign Agent Law 2.0
Tolga Şirin recently argued for activating interim measures under Rule 39 of the European Court of Human Rights in cases of political prosecution, such as that of Istanbul’s mayor İmamoğlu. This argument gains renewed urgency in light of Georgia’s proposed foreign agent law. Indeed, as civil society organizations (CSOs) face the threat of criminal sanctions under “Foreign Agent Law 2.0”, Rule 39 could become their last remaining remedy. Continue reading >>
0
26 May 2025
Fury and Surprise Anchored in Dogmas and Myths
The Court of Justice’s judgment in Commission v Malta has created quite some upheaval. That the judgment has caught so many legal commentators wrong-footed can be attributed to the fact that both sides overwhelmingly come from the premise that Member States are sovereign to decide who their nationals are and that there is no such thing as a genuine link requirement for nationality. This blog takes a closer look at these alleged certainties, and sets out why the judgment is not that surprising at all – lifting the veil of untenable dogmas and mystifications that have surrounded Declaration No 2 and the Court’s Micheletti judgment for too long along the way. Continue reading >>Taking Labour Law for a Ride
“Decent work in the platform economy” is one of the items the ILO will discuss during its upcoming 113th International Labour Conference from 2 to 13 June 2025 – a first in the ILO’s history. That proper classification of the employment relationship is fundamental to the application of fundamental rights was a critical point of contention among countries, employers and workers at the ILO, and thus brought the item on this year’s agenda. Proper classification of employment relationships remains a challenge, not just for the ILO. So, what exactly is the problem and how can we solve it? Continue reading >>
0
Hot Rule of Law Potatoes
Bulgaria’s civil society has much anticipated a key judgment by the CJEU as concerns over the entrenched capture and politicization of the Inspectorate with the Supreme Judicial Council (JI) continue to cast doubts about judicial independence and accountability in the country. Regrettably, however, the highly formalist ruling will hardly make a difference. Continue reading >>
0
The Meta Oversight Board in the Trump Era
In its latest decisions following major policy shifts at Meta, the Oversight Board appears to be moving toward a more permissive approach to harmful or discriminatory content. This post argues that such a trend could reshape the boundaries of acceptable speech online and raises pressing questions about the Board’s independence and role in an increasingly politicised content governance landscape. Continue reading >>
0
23 May 2025
From Syrian Revolution to Constitutional Ambiguity
The remarkable yet tragic victory of the Syrian revolution reached its turning point on December 7, 2024. Unlike the coups of the 1950s and 60s, whose leaders immediately sought legal legitimacy, the current de facto ruler, Ahmad al-Sharaa, has declared a five-year transitional period under a temporary Constitutional Declaration. While it formally guarantees equality, the Declaration omits fundamental democratic safeguards and fails to ensure the separation of powers - entrenching a system of self-referential authority and executive dominance that mirrors the authoritarian dynamics of the past. Continue reading >>Ein Verfassungsauftrag für die Ewigkeit?
In den aus Weimar übernommenen religionsverfassungsrechtlichen Vorschriften des Grundgesetzes schlummert seit jeher der Verfassungsauftrag, die Staatsleistungen an die Religionsgesellschaften abzulösen, also durch eine Entschädigungszahlung aufzuheben. Dieser Auftrag blieb auch in der 20. Wahlperiode unerfüllt. Dafür ist eine spezifische politische und föderale Interessenkonstellation in der Bundesrepublik verantwortlich. Art. 138 Abs. 1 WRV ist dadurch bis heute „kaltgestellt“, wofür aber hinreichende Lösungsmöglichkeiten bereitstehen. Continue reading >>We the Bugs
On April 14, 2025, the Hungarian parliament passed the 15th Amendment to the Fundamental Law, triggering mass protest across Budapest. Amongst its most far-reaching provisions is the constitutional entrenchment of binary sex. Read alongside a reworded Article XVI, which affirms that “every child has the right to the protection and care necessary for his or her proper physical, mental, and moral development”, these provisions establish a new hierarchy of fundamental rights, placing child protection above all others, including the right to peaceful assembly. These changes may now lend formal constitutional legitimacy to discriminatory legislation seeking to ban Pride Parades. Continue reading >>
0
22 May 2025
Drum prüfe, wer sich ewig bindet
Heute vor 50 Jahren fällte das Bundesverfassungsgericht seinen berühmten Radikalenbeschluss. Die Entscheidung drehte sich um die Frage, ob und wie der Staat gegen potenziell verfassungsfeindliche Beamt*innen bzw. Bewerber*innen für den Staatsdienst vorgehen kann. Sie ist bis heute prägend. Der Jahrestag bietet Anlass, die Entscheidung mit Blick auf ihre Aktualität kritisch zu hinterfragen. Continue reading >>Addio, Rule of Law?
Fears are spreading that Italy, too, may be joining the club of EU Member States dismantling the rule of law. In this post, I will discuss three episodes that indeed lay bare a set of enduring constitutional tensions: the “Striano gate”; the “Paragon affair”; and the enactment of a Security Decree. While the actors involved are not the same in each story, the constitutional stakes are analogous: the proper use of coercive powers in a democracy and the traditional dichotomy between freedom and state authority. So, are we witnessing early signs of democratic regression? Continue reading >>
0
Poland’s Polarised Presidency
The first round of Poland’s presidential election has produced an inconclusive but politically charged outcome. With no candidate achieving an absolute majority, the second round will determine who succeeds Andrzej Duda in the Presidential Palace. This election marks yet another critical moment for Poland. In the short term, its outcome will be pivotal for the current government to deliver on promises concerning the rule of law, the judiciary, and more. In the longer term, winning the presidential race is a strategic stepping stone towards consolidating or reclaiming power. Continue reading >>
0
Fasten für den Überfluss?
In den Vereinigten Staaten haben die Journalisten Ezra Klein und Derek Thompson mit ihrem Buch „Abundance“ eine Kritik des gegenwärtigen amerikanischen Verwaltungsstaats vorgelegt. Während Elon Musks DOGE am Rückbau der Bundesverwaltung arbeitet, wollen die beiden Journalisten sie neu aufstellen. Sie werben dafür, linke Politik, konkret der Demokratischen Partei, auf den titelgebenden Überfluss auszurichten: mehr Wohnen, mehr Energie, mehr öffentliche Forschung. Schon weil wir in der Bundesrepublik ähnliche Probleme, aber keine vergleichbare Methodenkritik haben, lohnt ein Blick nach Übersee. Continue reading >>21 May 2025
A Threat to the Core
On May 13, 2025, just before midnight, a FIDESZ deputy tabled a new bill before the Hungarian Parliament. The bill seeks to enhance “sovereignty protection measures” by introducing sweeping transparency instruments targeting foreign-funded interference in Hungarian public life. These restrictions purposefully shrink civic space further, roll back protections of fundamental rights and impair the functioning of constitutional democracy in a retrogressive fashion. When adopted, Hungary’s constitutional order will fundamentally regress from the state that existed at the time of its accession to the European Union. Continue reading >>
0
(Noch) nicht verboten, aber unvereinbar (Teil II)
Laut Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz ist die AfD mittlerweile „gesichert rechtsextremistisch“. Sie vertritt Positionen, die den gewerkschaftlichen Grundwerten fundamental widersprechen. Im ersten Teil meines Beitrags habe ich gezeigt, dass Gewerkschaften die AfD deshalb per Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss zu einer gegnerischen Organisation erklären können. In diesem zweiten Teil werde ich zeigen, dass auch der Gewerkschaftsausschluss von AfD-Mitgliedern möglich ist – anders, als eine kürzliche Entscheidung des LG Berlin II vermuten lässt. Continue reading >>
0
Text Messages, Transparency, and the Rule of Law
On 14 May 2025, the General Court of the EU ruled in favour of The New York Times in the much-awaited Pfizergate case, annulling the European Commission's decision to withhold the SMS text messages presumed to have been exchanged between EU Commission President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. While presented as another case concerning document access, potentially illuminating the informal negotiation process behind COVID-19 vaccine contracts and the management and archive of texts and other instant messages, this judgment largely defies this expectation. Continue reading >>
0
Legality Over Accountability?
On April 23, 2025, public prosecutors in Guatemala executed an arrest warrant against Luis Pacheco, the Deputy Energy Minister. This case is only the latest in a series of politically motivated prosecutions that place the Attorney General at the center of Guatemala’s democratic backsliding. She has systematically targeted journalists, public officials and civil society actors, undermining democracy, the rule of law, and fundamental rights. What can be done when legal mechanisms to hold public officials accountable are effectively blocked? When there are credible grounds to believe that a public official is abusing their mandate, accountability must take precedence in legal and political debate. Continue reading >>
0
20 May 2025
Grenzgänger
Kaum im Amt, hat der neue deutsche Innenminister die Pläne zu einer strikteren Kontrolle an den deutschen Staatsgrenzen umgesetzt. Die aktuelle Praxis der Bundespolizei wirft Fragen mit Blick auf die Vereinbarkeit mit der Dublin-III-Verordnung und dem Schengener Grenzkodex auf und ist nicht mit Art. 72 AEUV zu rechtfertigen. Unilaterale Abweichungen würden zudem das in Art. 3 Abs. 2 EUV formulierte Ziel der Realisierung eines unionsweiten Mobilitätsraums gefährden. Continue reading >>
0
19 May 2025
(Noch) nicht verboten, aber unvereinbar (Teil I)
Die AfD vertritt Positionen, die den gewerkschaftlichen Grundwerten widersprechen. Die gewerkschaftliche Interessenvertretung von Beschäftigten ist mit einer Mitgliedschaft in der AfD nicht vereinbar. Gewerkschaften dürfen die AfD deshalb per Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss zu einer gegnerischen Organisation erklären und Mitglieder ausschließen, die zugleich Mitglied der AfD sind – und sollten das auch tun. In diesem ersten Teil zeige ich, warum ein Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss bei der AfD möglich ist. Continue reading >>
0
16 May 2025
Whom Is Citizenship For?
On Thursday, May 15, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in “the birthright citizenship case.” Instead of deciding on the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order (EO) banning birthright citizenship for certain classes of individuals, the Court is asked to decide whether lower courts exceeded their authority in placing a nation-wide injunction on the government’s order. But this doesn't make the decision any less significant. Continue reading >>
0
Undoing the American Rechtsstaat
Donald Trump’s return to the forefront of U.S. politics brings an urgent constitutional question back into focus: Can the American administrative state survive another presidency driven by executive absolutism? Recent developments before the Supreme Court, especially in Trump v. U. S., suggest that long-standing norms and legal safeguards are under siege. This post explores how a second Trump term might exploit structural vulnerabilities in U.S. public law, with consequences that extend far beyond American borders. Continue reading >>
0