04 September 2025
Disapplication Unbound
Legal scholars welcomed the Apace ruling by the CJEU as a “total victory” for liberals supporting human rights and the independence of the judiciary. But the ruling has two central faut lines: it fails to acknowledge that Article 37 APD is not unconditional: its direct effect is, at best, dubious. Second, in Member States like Italy, where the judiciary makes extensive use of disapplication in asylum matters, the laissez-faire approach of the CJEU paves the way for legal uncertainty and exposes judges to populist attacks. Continue reading >>
1 
Compound Interest
Last week, President Trump purported to fire a member of the Federal Reserve Board, Dr. Lisa Cook. And although he appointed Jerome Powell Chairman of the Federal Reserve during his first term, Trump has since directed constant scorn at Powell and repeatedly threatened to remove him as well. This controversy forms part of Trump’s broader effort to assert sweeping control over the executive branch. It also reveals his particular interest in loosening U.S. monetary policy. Yet his actions carry significant legal and economic risks of their own. Continue reading >>
0
03 September 2025
The School Bell That Rings for War
On 1 September, known in Russia as Knowledge Day, thousands of schoolchildren were once again welcomed back with the ringing of the symbolic first bell, marking the beginning of new school year. However, this school bell does not toll for knowledge or peace. Instead, it symbolizes how Russia has transformed schools into factories for transmitting state-sponsored propaganda to younger generations. In this blog, I explain how Russia is strategically weaponizing the educational system to raise a militarized generation of subjects that accepts and embraces the normalcy of war. It seeks to achieve this goal, inter alia, through military training and involvement of children in the production of combat equipment; obligating teachers to teach state-mandated falsification of history; and forcing cultural assimilation of Ukrainians living in occupied territories. Continue reading >>
0
01 September 2025
From One ICJ to Another
In early August, Judge Julia Sebutinde of the International Court of Justice was reported as saying that “The Lord is counting on me to stand on the side of Israel”, and that the “whole world was against Israel, including my country.” These statements appear to contradict the requirement that Judges remain impartial. Following these remarks, a non-governmental organization called the International Commission of Jurists sent a communication to the President of the Court to urge him to investigate Judge Sebutinde’s remarks. While this move was met with general acclaim on social media, it could likewise be perceived as attempting to put external pressure on the Court to reach a certain decision. Continue reading >>
0
Reproduktive Ungerechtigkeit
Reproduktive Rechte befinden sich weltweit in einer Krise. Der aktuelle Weltbevölkerungsbericht der Vereinten Nationen zeigt, dass Familienplanung und Fortpflanzung unter erheblichem (bevölkerungs-)politischen Druck stehen, auch in Deutschland. Schwarze Aktivistinnen fordern seit langem, diese Entwicklung nicht nur als Einschränkung persönlicher Freiheit zu sehen, sondern die strukturellen Ursachen als Teil der reproduktiven Gerechtigkeit („Reproductive Justice“) zu betrachten. Das erfordert ein Umdenken. Continue reading >>
0
31 August 2025
Overcoming Objections to Overcome the Hungarian Veto
This June, we proposed ways to overcome a Hungarian veto on EU sanctions against Russia. Our proposal prompted Mark Dawson and Martijn van den Brink to write a sharp response, arguing that we had ventured beyond the confines of serious legal scholarship into the realm of the fantastical. Our critics and we seem to live in different realities. When reading Dawson’s and van den Brink’s piece, it feels like the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine does not exist. Yet, there lies an uncomfortable truth at the heart of our proposal, one that our critics fail to recognize: the Russian war might grow into an existential threat to the European Union. Continue reading >>30 August 2025
Regelungslosigkeit als Prinzip
Die Vergesellschaftung von Grund und Boden ist eines der umstrittensten Instrumente des Grundgesetzes. Im Zuge der Debatten um eine Neuausrichtung des Berliner Wohnungsmarkts hat die dortige SPD-Fraktion nun einen Entwurf für ein sog. Vergesellschaftungsrahmengesetz erarbeitet. Ein Blick in den Entwurf lässt erahnen: Hier entsteht ein regelungsloses Gesetz, welches die Verfassung lediglich nachbilden soll, ihren Sinn aber verkennt. Denn der Entwurf definiert auch solche Eigentumsregulierungen, die bislang als bloße Inhalts- und Schrankenbestimmungen galten, als eine Vergesellschaftung – und macht sie damit entschädigungspflichtig. Continue reading >>29 August 2025
Marx, Enemy of the Constitution?
Is it constitutionally permissible to hold a Marx reading group in the German Republic? According to a recent judgment of Hamburg’s Administrative Court: unclear. A reading group can apparently only take place as long as it does not “actively and combatively” promote Marx’s ideas, since “the social theory formulated by Marx” is in essential points “incompatible with the principles of the liberal democratic basic order” of the Federal Republic. The judgement is worth examining in detail. Continue reading >>
0
28 August 2025
Verfassungsfeind Marx?
Darf man in der Bundesrepublik unbehelligt einen Lesekreis zu Marx veranstalten? Laut Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg: Unklar. Stattfinden darf der Lesekreis ohne Einmischung staatlicher Behörden anscheinend nur, solange er sich nicht „aktiv-kämpferisch“ für Marx‘ Ideen einsetzt, da „die von Marx begründete Gesellschaftstheorie“ in wesentlichen Punkten mit den „Prinzipien der freiheitlichen demokratischen Grundordnung nicht vereinbar“ sei. Es lohnt sich, dieses Urteil im Detail anzuschauen. Continue reading >>Lithium, Law, and the Limits of EU Sustainability
In July 2024, the European Commission entered into a strategic partnership on critical raw materials with Serbia by signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on sustainable raw materials and battery value chains. Three days before signing the MoU, the Serbian government had decided to renew the spatial plan for the realization of the “Jadar” project, which includes the exploitation of the mineral Jadarite in western Serbia. These two events have signaled the readiness of the Serbian regime to allow lithium mining in western Serbia and the EU’s commitment to exploit a source of critical raw material (CRM) in its neighborhood, particularly in the Western Balkans. Continue reading >>
0
26 August 2025
The Other Side of Trade
On 10 August 2025, Germany announced it would suspend the export of offensive weapons to Israel, citing the risk of mass civilian casualties during Israel’s planned incursion into Gaza City. Yet Germany’s military trade with Israel is a two-way street. As crucial as Berlin’s arms exports are its growing imports of Israeli weapons, military technology, and security expertise, including training. Continue reading >>Not a Curtain Drop, but an Abuse of Rights
The recent Grand Chamber decision in Kovačević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina might send shockwaves through the legal and political landscape in Bosnia and Herzegovina or even across Council of Europe states, as Professor Joseph Marko suggests in his article. However, his analysis presents an incomplete picture of the Court’s decision and overlooks critical context necessary for a full understanding of why the Grand Chamber declared the application inadmissible. Continue reading >>
0
Klimaschutz in Karlsruhe 5.0
Vor kurzem ließen mehrere Pressemitteilungen deutscher Umweltverbände Verfassungsrechtler:innen aufhorchen. Die vom Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND), Greenpeace, Germanwatch, dem Solarenergie-Förderverein Deutschland und der Deutschen Umwelthilfe (DUH) im Sommer/Herbst 2023 eingereichten „Zukunftsklagen“ werden in Karlsruhe offenbar ernst genommen. Im weiteren Verfahren könnte auch das kürzlich ergangene Gutachten des Internationalen Gerichtshofs (IGH) zu völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtungen der Staaten mit Bezug zum Klimawandel eine wichtige Rolle spielen. Continue reading >>22 August 2025
Trump’s Manufactured Emergencies
The Trump administration’s actions in Washington D.C. represent the continuation of interconnected political and rhetorical tactics that the president has used since his second inauguration that we should expect to see again and again – using misleading or downright fabricated information as the basis for declaring an emergency, relying on the fabricated emergency to invoke emergency legal authorities, and then relying on those authorities to take actions that exceed even the broad powers that such emergencies confer under the law. Looking ahead, we can expect the administration to run this same playbook in additional, predictable ways. Continue reading >>
0
The Next Episode On Gender-Based Asylum
One of the CJEU’s most talked-about recent cases asks a simple question: when does someone belong to a “particular social group” under EU refugee law? On 11 June 2024 in K, L v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (K, L), the CJEU found that, women who genuinely came to identify themselves with the fundamental value of equality between women and men during their stay in the host country can be regarded as belonging to a particular social group. However, the implementation of the K, L judgment has led to a divergence between national policy and national courts over the meaning of “identification with the fundamental value of equality between women and men.” Continue reading >>
0
The Case for a Royal Commission on Britain and Europe
How much longer can Britain’s unstable relationship with the European Union be tolerated? While Prime Minister Keir Starmer vocally supports European unity regarding Ukraine, he denies it for his own country. Nearly ten years after the referendum, the costs of Brexit are rising, and public opinion is increasingly favouring closer ties with the EU. This post suggests that the current deadlock calls for a Royal Commission to overcome parliamentary paralysis, provide an evidence-based assessment of post-Brexit realities, and lay the groundwork for strategic decisions about the UK’s role in Europe. Continue reading >>Weaponising Disqualification
On August 20, 2025, the Indian Government introduced three constitutional amendment bills of massive implications in the Parliament. Together, the bills aim to establish a mandatory legal sanction providing that any minister can be removed from their ministerial office if arrested or detained for thirty consecutive days on charges carrying a potential sentence of five years or more. At first glance, the bills may seem laudatory, founded on the expectation of ethical standards for high constitutional office. Yet, one can clearly anticipate the gross impending misuse of this law towards establishing a hegemonic BJP rule in India. Continue reading >>
0
21 August 2025
Palestine Action, Proscription and Proportionality
In July, the UK government has decided to proscribe the organisation Palestine Action. The order means that people are criminalised not just for expressing support for terrorist acts, but for the proscribed organisation. As a result, over 500 people were reportedly arrested at a protest in London on 9 August. Whether the decision pushes anti-terrorism law too far and violates freedom of expression will be assessed by the courts at a later date. If the decision survives a legal challenge, it could pave the way for proscription to be used in relation to a broader range of groups in future. Continue reading >>
0
20 August 2025
Safe for Everyone?
On 1 August, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its much-anticipated judgment, addressing the interpretation of the “safe country of origin” (SCO) concept under the Asylum Procedures Directive 2013/32 (APD). Contrary to AG de la Tour, the Court firmly ruled that Member States cannot designate a country as “safe” unless it provides adequate protection to its entire population. Ultimately, the Court’s judgment effectively preserves the current protection until the EU legislator fully exercises its prerogative to amend the rules. Continue reading >>
0
Klarheit für das Krankenhauswesen aus Karlsruhe?
Seit Jahren lähmt der Kompetenzkonflikt zwischen Bund und Ländern Reformen im Krankenhauswesen. Nun richten sich einige Länder mit einer abstrakten Normenkontrolle gegen Vorgaben des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zu Mindestmengen und zur Personalbesetzung. Die aufgeworfenen verfassungsrechtlichen Fragen dürften auch für die große Krankenhausreform bedeutsam sein. Es geht um den Widerspruch zwischen qualitätsfördernder Zentralisierung und flächendeckender Versorgung. Eine Leerstelle der bisherigen Diskussion sind die Grundrechte der Patient:innen. Continue reading >>Tariftreue light
Ein neues Bundestariftreuegesetz soll den Bund dazu verpflichten, öffentliche Aufträge nur noch an solche Auftragnehmer:innen zu vergeben, die ihren Arbeitnehmer:innen tarifliche Arbeitsbedingungen gewähren – unabhängig davon, ob sie tarifgebunden sind oder nicht. Die Diskussion ist nicht neu: Die Ampel-Koalition scheiterte, bevor ihr Entwurf verabschiedet werden konnte. Am 6. August 2025 hat sich die Regierung im Kabinett auf einen neuen Entwurf geeinigt. Der Entwurf verfolgt das richtige Ziel, ist jedoch nicht konsequent genug, um die Tarifautonomie tatsächlich zu stärken. Continue reading >>
0
19 August 2025
Eroding Independence
On 7 August 2025, India’s Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi made serious allegations of large-scale voter fraud. Examining electoral rolls covering approximately 650,000 voters in one state assembly constituency within a parliamentary constituency, Gandhi claimed that over 100,000 voters had significant irregularities that hinted at manipulation. This post does not discuss the veracity of these allegations. Rather, the goal here is to contextualise these allegations against the backdrop of a sharp decline in the independence and trustworthiness of the Election Commission of India. Continue reading >>
0
14 August 2025
(Kein) Geld für die Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung
Die AfD-nahe Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung (DES) hat beim Bundesinnenministerium (BMI) für das Haushaltsjahr 2026 einen Antrag auf staatliche Förderung in Millionenhöhe gestellt. Es spricht einiges dafür, dass er wegen des neuen Kriteriums der „Verfassungsfreundlichkeit“ gem. § 2 Abs. 4 und Abs. 5 StiftFinG erfolglos sein wird. Es bestehen allerdings erhebliche Bedenken, ob die Norm einer verfassungsgerichtlichen Kontrolle standhält und insbesondere mit dem Grundsatz der Chancengleichheit der Parteien und dem Bestimmtheitsgebot vereinbar ist. Continue reading >>13 August 2025
“Occupation” as Euphemism
On 10 August, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gathered a press conference to explain an earlier cabinet decision “to occupy” Gaza. What he introduced, to the dismay of allied governments in Europe, was a military incursion on Gaza City and “the central camps and Mawasi.” Netanyahu promised a “non-Israeli civilian administration” and, in English, adjusted the earlier framing of the operation, which had by then been embraced and echoed in Israeli media: that plan is “not to occupy Gaza, but to free it.” Such rhetoric invites scrutiny – not only for the legal ramifications of the acts announced, but it also calls into attention the shifting uses of the word occupation in Israeli political discourse. Continue reading >>
0
12 August 2025
Reproductive Violence in Tigray
A new July 2025 investigative report highlights the devastating weaponized sexual and reproductive violence unleashed during the 2020-2022 Tigray conflict in Ethiopia. Based on hundreds of medical records and health worker testimonies, the report documents mass rape, sexual slavery, forced pregnancy, and sexual torture of Tigrayan women and children by Ethiopian and Eritrean soldiers. The deliberate reproductive dimension of violence in Tigray constitutes clear violations of both the Maputo Protocol and international law, amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity. Continue reading >>
0
11 August 2025
A Fallen Curtain and Open Questions
On 25 June 2025, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered its Decision on Kovačević v. BiH. This ruling could completely change the legal assessment of strict ethnic quota systems in political institutions for worse. While the case originates from Bosnia and Herzegovina, it will likely have far-reaching political consequences for other power-sharing systems in and beyond Europe, as well. Crucially, it is prone to “overrule” all previous judgments of the ECtHR against BiH. This means that it will render all future efforts to support constitutional reform in the country futile, because it seems to legitimize the de facto strict ethno-national cartel of power materialized in its constitution. Continue reading >>
0
Wer ist eigentlich Verfassungsfeind?
In mehreren Bundesländern steht eine Reform der Verfassungsschutzgesetze an – und damit auch die Chance, die Definition der „freiheitlichen demokratischen Grundordnung“ zu modernisieren. Statt an überholten Formulierungen aus den 1950er-Jahren festzuhalten, könnten die Legaldefinitionen enger an den Kernelementen Menschenwürde, Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit ausgerichtet werden. Doch die Reformansätze der Länder gehen auseinander. Continue reading >>
0
10 August 2025
The Texas Gambit
American politics at present is defined by the daily discarding of long-standing norms. The latest ignominy involves the brazen attempt, by the Republican leadership of the State of Texas, to gerrymander the state’s congressional districts to give the GOP control over an additional five seats; a move that, if successful, would raise the number of U.S. House seats held by Texas Republicans. What is unprecedented in the Texas situation is both the origin and timing of the attempted gerrymander, and the gaudy theatricality that has followed. Continue reading >>
0
08 August 2025
Schmutz und Würde
Mit der Entscheidung von Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, für die Wahl als Richterin des Bundesverfassungsgerichts nicht mehr zur Verfügung zu stehen, endete eine politische Hängepartie für die schwarz-rote Koalition. Zugleich kulminierte auch eine teils sehr heftig und unfair geführte Debatte über die inhaltlichen Positionen und Qualifikationen von Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf. In einer Demokratie für ein öffentliches Amt zu kandidieren und sich damit einer Wahl zu stellen, ist immer eine Herausforderung und verdient per se genauso Respekt wie die Entscheidung, von einer solchen Kandidatur aus politischen Gründen zurückzutreten. Gleichzeitig wirft die Erklärung von Brosius-Gersdorf in drei Punkten Fragen auf. Continue reading >>Klarheit aus Den Haag
Am 23. Juli 2025 verkündete der Internationale Gerichtshof (IGH) sein lange erwartetes Gutachten zu den „Pflichten der Staaten in Bezug auf den Klimawandel“. Darin bestätigte das Gericht, dass Staaten nach geltendem Völkerrecht verpflichtet sind, erhebliche Schäden am Klimasystem zu verhindern. Kommen sie dieser Pflicht nicht nach, können sie haftbar gemacht werden. Das Gutachten hat tiefgreifende Konsequenzen für Produzenten fossiler Energieträger und zieht zudem erhebliche Auswirkungen auf das internationale Investitionsrecht nach sich. Continue reading >>
0
Colombia’s Ketchup-Bottle-Case
It may well be Colombian literary culture shining through when the presiding judge of the case against former President Álvaro Uribe cited the French aristocrat: “As Montesquieu rightly said, the law must be like death, which spares no one”. The verdict of 12 years in prison has been 14 years in the making. The most important implication of this case is neither the verdict itself, nor the length of the sentence – it is its nature as a “Ketchup-Bottle-Case”: the opening for more than 100 cases in the system that include crimes against humanity carrying life-in-prison sentences. Continue reading >>
0
Litigation v. Politics
The Trump Administration appears committed to crush any and all opposition by the aggressive use of national power. Given the constitutional status of federalism within the United States, these attempts at control from Washington are provoking a wave of litigation. However, it is also important to pay attention to the political means by which states can engage in resistance. A major issue of the moment is whether the Texas Legislature will adhere to the strong demand by Donald Trump that it redraw the legislative districts; and whether Democrats within the state will succeed in their defiance. Continue reading >>
0
07 August 2025
Warum politisch denkende Verfassungsrichter kein Problem sind
Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf hat ihre Kandidatur für die Wahl zur Bundesverfassungsrichterin zurückgezogen. Die Debatte gibt Anlass, einmal deutlich zu machen, dass sich Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und Politik in der Art ihrer Entscheidungsfindung unterscheiden, und gerade dieser Unterschied ein Gewinn für demokratisches Regieren ist. Denn es erhöht die Rationalität des Regierens, wenn politische Regelungen noch einmal aus verfassungsrechtlicher Perspektive geprüft werden. Betrachtet man dieses Potential der Verfassungsrechtsprechung, dann stellt sich heraus, dass die Bedenken gegen die Wahl von Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf der Arbeitsweise des Verfassungsgerichtes nicht gerecht wurden. Continue reading >>Game, Set, Review
The long-standing tension between private sports arbitration and the EU’s system of fundamental rights came to a head on 1 August 2025, when the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in RFC Seraing v. FIFA. The case addresses whether arbitral awards rendered by the Court of Arbitration for Sport can be insulated from review by EU national courts when EU law is at stake. The judgment represents a restrained but meaningful intervention by the CJEU into the autonomy of sports arbitration, seeking to balance the authority of CAS with the imperative of protective fundamentals rights under EU law. Continue reading >>Three Opposites in Taiwan’s Refracted Constitution
Civil society groups have initiated a mass recall movement in Taiwan, targeting the main opposition party KMT. On 26 July, it received an electoral setback. The movement has been hailed as the most recent evidence for Taiwan’s robust democracy. But its result suggests a more complicated and nuanced story concerning Taiwan’s constitutional image. Continue reading >>Sex Testing on Trial
Two global sport governing bodies – World Athletics and World Boxing – decided to institute genetic testing. Both now require all athletes intending to compete in women’s events to undergo a genetic test. The intent is to exclude some women, including those with certain congenital “differences of sex development”, from women’s sport. This revives an old model – last widely used in 1990s – which was deemed unscientific, unethical, and ultimately unworkable. In today’s legal landscape, this renewed approach faces even more pitfalls. Continue reading >>06 August 2025
Weigerung verweigert
Immer mehr Krankenhäuser sind wegen der Ökonomisierung gezwungen, mit anderen zu fusionieren. So fusioniert sowohl in Flensburg wie in Lippstadt ein evangelisches mit einem katholischen Haus. In beiden Fällen setzten sich die katholischen Träger durch und verankerten in den Gesellschaftsverträgen, dass in dem neuen Krankenhaus keine Schwangerschaftsabbrüche mehr angeboten werden dürfen. Doch gemischt-konfessionelle Krankenhäuser haben kein kollektives religiöses Recht, Schwangerschaftsabbrüche zu verweigern. Continue reading >>Crisis and Legal Scholarship
References to crisis abound. Since the 2008 financial crash and with the popularisation of the term “polycrisis” after the COVID-19 pandemic, the idea that we live in times of crises shapes public opinion, political discourse, and academic debates. A review of posts published on Verfassungsblog between January and July 2025 reveals an average of 15 posts per month mentioning some kind of crisis. Crisis is certainly a catchword, and these are hard to resist. But the pervasiveness of this term can also tell us something about the kind of knowledge produced by legal scholarship. Continue reading >>Rodina And Borisova V. Latvia And The Principle Of Self-Defending Democracy
The ECtHR, in its recent judgment on 10 July 2025 in the case of Rodina and Borisova v. Latvia, examined the applicants’ complaints regarding the refusals of domestic authorities to authorize the assemblies they wished to hold on 9 May and 23 September 2014. The ECtHR analyzed the freedom of peaceful assembly within the context of the principle of self-defending democracy. It reaffirmed that no one should be permitted to invoke the provisions of the ECHR to weaken or destroy the ideals and values of a democratic society. Continue reading >>
0
05 August 2025
Rechtswissenschaft und Citizen Science
Citizen Science als Forschungsansatz hat in der Rechtswissenschaft bisher keine Verbreitung gefunden. Der Beitrag stellt das Konzept der Citizen Science aus Anlass des Projekts „Offener Zugang zum Grundgesetz“ vor und lädt alle Interessierten dazu ein, am ersten bürgerschaftlichen Review einer Grundgesetzkommentierung mitzuwirken. Continue reading >>04 August 2025
Taxation Without Representation
What started as a trade war in 2018 – and a domestic policy aimed at recalibrating the U.S. trade policy – has quietly transformed into a tool of hidden taxation, enabling the U.S. executive branch, meaning the President of the United States, to raise revenue and dramatically influence fiscal policy without legislative consent or even minimal participation in the legislative process by Congress. This divergence from legal norms represents a constitutional rupture – what I call the rise of a shadow fiscal state: a parallel tax system designed and executed solely through executive discretion rather than transparency and congressional legislation. Continue reading >>
0
Behemoth v. The Dual State in the Gaza War
Fraenkel’s The Dual State (1941) and Neumann’s Behemoth (1942) offer two diverging accounts of the legal reality under National Socialism. The controversy between the two is important not only for the Gaza War, but also for the future of international humanitarian law writ large. The picture, according to which if lawyers had more power post-World War I, democracies in Europe would not have collapsed, affected both constitutional and international law. Yet, the claim that Weimar and the world could have been saved if only the law and lawyers had possessed more power is inaccurate. We are now reliving the consequences of this mistake in the Gaza War. Continue reading >>
0
01 August 2025
Tat und Territorium
Am 23. Juli 2025 wurde Sebastian Hotz alias „El Hotzo“ vom Amtsgericht Berlin-Tiergarten vom Vorwurf der Billigung von Straftaten, § 140 StGB, freigesprochen. Die Bedeutung des Falls erschöpft sich nicht in der bekannten Streitfrage um das Verhältnis von grundrechtlicher Meinungsfreiheit und strafrechtlichen Meinungsäußerungsdelikten. Tatsächlich wirft er noch ein anders gelagertes Problem auf: Kann das deutsche Strafrecht die Billigung einer Tat erfassen, die im Ausland begangen wurde? Dass § 140 StGB auch solche Anlasstaten erfassen kann, gilt als gefestigt. Diese Auslegung bricht aber mit dem historischen Sinn der Norm und weitet das Strafrecht in Bereiche aus, in denen es nichts zu suchen hat. Continue reading >>Niemals normal
Nach langem Ringen trat im November 2024 endlich das Selbstbestimmungsgesetz (SBGG) in Kraft. Nun hat das Bundesinnenministerium einen Referentenentwurf vorgelegt, der die antidiskriminierende Zielsetzung des SBGG weit verfehlt: Der alte Geschlechtseintrag und die alten Vornamen einer Person sollen nach einer Änderung gemäß SGBB Bestandteil ihres behördlichen Datensatzes bleiben und diese Daten mit anderen Behörden geteilt werden. Das kreiert eine unnötige Datenflut und gefährdet Grundrechte. Continue reading >>
0
A State Without Statehood
One year after New Caledonia was tormented by violent demonstrations, resulting in the deaths of 14 people and causing over 2 billion euros worth of damage, representatives of New Caledonia and the French State signed the Bougival Accord to bring an end to the situation and pave the way for peace. While Emmanuel Macron hails the Accord as “historic”, the overseas minister Manuel Valls celebrates it as “the best response to the fear”. However, a closer look at the agreement reveals that the Accord continues to entrench the French hold on the island and renders New Caledonian independence more elusive than ever. Continue reading >>
0
31 July 2025
Der Preis der Deeskalation
Mitten in einer transatlantischen Zollschlacht hat die Europäische Union einem US-Handelsdiktat zugestimmt, das einen drohenden Handelskrieg abwendet – und zugleich fundamentale verfassungsrechtliche Fragen aufwirft. Hat Brüssel aus Notwendigkeit seine Prinzipien preisgegeben? Oder beweist der Deal die bemerkenswerte Elastizität des EU-Verfassungsraums unter äußerem Zwang? Zwar schafft das Abkommen kurzfristig Stabilität, langfristig aber lotet es die Grenzen von Kompetenzen, Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit in der EU aus – eine Gratwanderung zwischen Souveränität und Submission. Continue reading >>Holistisch, praktisch, gut?
Am 24. Juli 2025 fiel das Urteil gegen Yekatom und Ngaïssona und mit ihm ein Stück klassischer Dogmatik im Völkerstrafrecht. Unter Effizienzdruck setzte der IStGH auf Tempo, Kontext und strukturierte Gesamtschau statt auf starre Zurechnungs- und Beweisregeln. Ein Verfahren, das nicht nur Täter verurteilte, sondern auch Maßstäbe für die Rolle der Verfahrensführung in der internationalen Strafjustiz verschob. Continue reading >>30 July 2025
Parteiverbotsverfahren in der öffentlichen Debatte
In der seit einigen Monaten kontrovers geführten Debatte um ein mögliches AfD-Verbot werden immer wieder Positionen mit rechtlichen Argumenten unterfüttert, die mit Blick auf das Verfassungsrecht kaum haltbar oder zumindest stark umstritten sind. Ihnen soll im Folgenden besondere Aufmerksamkeit gelten: als Mahnung an alle, die sich öffentlich zu diesem Thema äußern, dass die juristische Methodik auch dort nicht vernachlässigt werden darf, wo (gefühlte) politische Dringlichkeit auf normative Komplexität trifft. Continue reading >>“We Were Just Cooperating!”
On June 12th 2025, Advocate General (AG) Ćapeta delivered her Opinion in Case WS v Frontex (C-746/23 P), concerning Frontex’ responsibility for violations of fundamental rights in joint return operations (JROs). The AG first exposes serious logical and legal flaws in the General Court’s approach before explaining why Frontex can be held directly accountable for fundamental rights violations when acting in cooperation with Member States; a question that was central to the applicants’ case but one that the General Court failed to address entirely. Continue reading >>
0
Wenn Städte sterben
Zerstörte Städte sind mehr als Trümmer. Sie sind gezielte Angriffe auf soziale Vielfalt und urbane Identität. Der Begriff „Urbizid“ rückt diese systematische Vernichtung ins Zentrum völkerrechtlicher Debatten. Doch das geltende Recht greift zu kurz: Zwischen Eigentumsschutz und Kriegsverbrechen bleibt eine Schutzlücke. Könnte ein neuer völkerstrafrechtlicher Tatbestand für den urbanen Lebensraum diese Leerstelle endlich schließen? Continue reading >>
0