01 February 2022
Ein Raum für den freien Diskurs
Die Stadt München muss einen Raum für eine Diskussion zur Verfügung stellen, bei der es auch um die BDS-Bewegung („Boycott, Divestments and Sanctions“) gehen könnte. Das Urteil des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts vom letzten Donnerstag bewegt sich im Rahmen der gefestigten Rechtsprechung zur Meinungsfreiheit, sorgt aber dennoch für Aufregung. Wie lässt sich das erklären? Continue reading >>
1 
29 January 2022
The Dutch Family Reunification Procedure
Being able to reunite with family from abroad falls under the right to family life, one of the fundamental rights every individual is entitled to. Despite this, some Dutch family reunification requirements are potentially at odds with international human rights law standards and the EU Directive 2003/86/EC on the right to family reunification. This problematic state of affairs reflects the ongoing racialization of European borders, and that of Dutch borders in particular. Continue reading >>
0
The Racialized Borders of the Netherlands
The principal function of borders in immigration law is to distinguish between persons and goods which are permitted to enter a territory and those which are not. I call this the filtering function of the border. In this short contribution, I enquire into how this filtering function of the border operates in the context of border controls in the Netherlands. More specifically, I argue that the way border controls are performed in the Netherlands structurally produces racialized subjects. Continue reading >>
0
Abwägungsrationalität und subjektive Beliebigkeit
Meine Kollegin Ute Sacksofsky hat die von mir geäußerte Kritik an ihrem Beitrag zur verfassungsrechtlichen Bewertung der Impfpflicht aufgegriffen. Sie ist meiner Erwiderung teils mit Klarstellungen, teils mit vertieften Argumenten entgegengetreten. Dies weiß ich sehr zu schätzen. Weil ich ihre Einwände ernst nehme, sie aber für nicht überzeugend halte, möchte ich dazu ebenfalls noch einmal Stellung nehmen, zumal es hier um grundrechtsdogmatisch wichtige Fragen geht, die weit über die – bald ohnehin verbummelte – Impfpflicht hinausweisen. Continue reading >>28 January 2022
International Migration Law and Coloniality
In European human rights law, it is taken for granted that states have the sovereign right to regulate migration. A right to be admitted to a country of which one is not a national, or a right not to be expelled, exists only in exceptional cases. In this blogpost, I look at the origins of “the right to control the entry of non-nationals”. These are to be found in a shift in the colonial labour system which occurred in the second half of the 19th century. It is this history which explains the inequality represented on the map above. Continue reading >>
0
Austria’s Struggle to Respond to Climate Change
Cancelling the planned construction of a highway tunnel beneath a Viennese national park in December 2021, the Green Minister for Climate Action Leonore Gewessler left local politicians outraged. Although the Austrian Constitution provides different links to sustainability and climate change, the Austrian Constitutional Court decided in a landmark case five years ago to interpret the constitutional provisions on climate change in a restrictive manner leading (bottom-up) ambitions to strengthen climate change litigation into a constitutional deadlock. The recent decision of Mrs. Gewessler opens up new (top-down) approaches towards an ecological executive. Continue reading >>
0
Jenseits jeglicher Kontrolle
Das Begnadigungsrecht des Bundespräsidenten ist bislang allenfalls spärlich öffentlich diskutiert worden. Obwohl es den Grundsatz der Gewaltenteilung jedenfalls punktuell aufhebt und damit im Widerspruch zu den Grundpfeilern eines demokratischen Rechtsstaates steht, ist es als Kompetenz des Bundespräsidenten dennoch in der Verfassung verankert. Mit einer Klage vor dem Verwaltungsgericht Berlin gegen das Bundespräsidialamt möchte das Transparenz-Portal „FragDenStaat“ nun überprüfen, inwieweit der Bundespräsident jedenfalls Auskunft über Entscheidungen in Gnadeverfahren geben muss. Die Klage macht den Weg für eine lange überfällige Diskussion darüber frei, wie die Ausübung des Begnadigungsrechts demokratischen und rechtstaatlichen Mindeststandards unterworfen werden kann. Continue reading >>Voting in the Pandemic
On Sunday, 30 January 2022, Portugal will go to the ballots on a snap election. Despite some initiatives to adapt the legal framework of the right to vote to the challenges of a pandemic, the amendments failed to accommodate the cases of persons under compulsory quarantine on election day, disenfranchising hundred thousands of voters in 2020-2021. Ironically, the severity of the new variant Omicron, possibly limiting the rights of up to a million voters, appears to restore the right to vote, even though on a dubious legal basis. Continue reading >>
0
Allgemeine Impfpflicht II – und die Abwehr des Subjektiven
Vor einer Woche habe ich einen Blogbeitrag zu „Allgemeine Impfpflicht – ein kleiner Piks, ein großes verfassungsrechtliches Problem“ verfasst. Der Beitrag hat zahlreiche Reaktionen ausgelöst. Teils beruhen diese auf Missverständnissen oder einer ungenauen Lektüre meines Textes. Insbesondere Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz hat mir zu viel Subjektivität, zu starke individuelle Beliebigkeit vorgeworfen – ich hätte mich „verrannt“. Dies gibt Anlass zu einigen Klarstellungen und weiteren Erläuterungen. Continue reading >>A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU's preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lack of clarity and precision in certain points, generally considers the PNR Directive to be “compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data”. His arguments are not convincing. Continue reading >>
0
Postcolonial Migration and Citizenship in the Netherlands
Can formerly colonized subjects and their descendants be full and equal citizens of the former metropoles – and if so, what would that look like? In this blogpost, we explore these politics of belonging in European postcolonial polities by looking at different conceptualizations of the relationship between the Dutch state and Surinamese-Dutch citizens and immigrants. While Dutch government discourses tend to represent Surinamese-Dutch as too different to belong to the Dutch Nation, Surinamese-Dutch organisations claimed postcolonial citizenship as different and equal. Continue reading >>
0
27 January 2022
Rights for Others, Firing Back?
Colonialism and decolonization have importantly shaped the constitutional trajectories of not only the colonized states, but also those of the colonizers. For the Netherlands, decolonization did not only dictate the pace of various constitutional reforms in the mid-20th century that were ‘needed’ to erase Indonesia (1948) and New Guinea (1963) from the text of the constitution, but also introduced new constitutional documents, such as the 1949 Dutch-Indonesian Union Charter and the 1954 Charter of the Kingdom. While it is necessary to critically analyze the impact of these postcolonial arrangements on former colonies, it is equally urgent to fill the profound gap in knowledge about the impact of colonialism and decolonization on domestic constitutional arrangements. Continue reading >>
0
26 January 2022
The European Convention of Human Rights’ Colonial Clause and the End of Empire
In this post, I would like to shed light on an important, yet generally overlooked aspect of the European Convention of Human Rights, namely that it was drafted at a time when many of the member states of the Council of Europe were still important colonial powers. While European empires in Asia were in decline and the Netherlands was in the process of withdrawing from Indonesia, this was not the case in what was then called New Guinea, Surinam or the Antilles. Colonial empires in Africa, for their part, were still well established and the question of the territorial application of the Convention was hotly debated in the drafting process. What were the implications of this link between human rights and empire? Continue reading >>
0
Police Action or War?
The conflict in Indonesia in 1945–1949 was not a police action against insurgents in the context of a colonial territory in which domestic law alone was applicable; it was an international armed conflict in the context of independence in which international law should have played its role. The crimes committed during the conflict from both sides were war crimes and crimes against humanity. Continue reading >>
0
Clause 9 of the Nationality and Borders Bill
In July 2021, the UK government set to work on a new Nationality and Borders Bill. Should this far-reaching amendment acquire statutory force, it will raise important questions about the capacity of the UK constitution to prevent sweeping executive authorisation, even in matters with intense bearing on the most profound human rights and entitlements. Continue reading >>
0
25 January 2022
Aggression, War Crimes, and the Indonesian Revolution
The specter of the Indonesian Revolution is still haunting our understanding of Dutch imperial violence. In this blog post, I want to highlight two central issues regarding the conflict’s legal history – one involving the alleged non-application of the laws of war to the conflict which has been a mainstay argument in Dutch official narratives, and the other regarding the ways in which we delineate today our legal-moral reasoning with respect to Dutch transgression. Continue reading >>
0
Jenseits der roten Linien
Abgeordnete aus Russland sollten nicht an der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarats (PACE) teilnehmen können. Dies haben am vergangenen Montag, zu Beginn der neuen Sitzungsperiode, Abgeordnete aus der Ukraine und dem Baltikum gefordert und die Beglaubigungsschreiben der russischen Delegation angefochten. Am Mittwoch muss nun über diese abgestimmt werden, damit die russische Delegation ihr Mandat in der PACE aufnehmen kann. Auch die deutschen Delegierten sollten die russischen Beglaubigungsschreiben, wenn überhaupt, dann nur unter Auflagen ratifizieren. Continue reading >>
0
Time to Rewrite the EU Directive on Combating Terrorism
The adoption of EU Directive 2017/541 on combating terrorism in March 2017 has profoundly changed the landscape of European counter-terrorism law. The primary aim of this Directive was to further harmonise the legal framework under which terrorist offences are prosecuted across EU Member States by establishing minimum rules and standards. However, the adverse consequences for the rule of law and human rights have been overlooked from the very outset by the EU institutions. Now, five years after its adoption, it is time for a thorough revision. Continue reading >>
0
The Grotian Myth and Dutch Modern Imperialism
The self-image of The Netherlands as a nation with a legalist (or Grotian) approach to international affairs has turned a blind eye to how Grotian legal reasonings and arguments have been used to legitimize Dutch colonialism and to shape the post-colonial structure of international law. Continue reading >>
0
24 January 2022
Pushbacks? Never mind, we’re doing it
"Pushback" has been elected Germany’s non-word of the year 2021. The word is rather innocent, the act is the problem. The EU Commission has now submitted a proposal for an amendment of the Schengen Borders Code that allows for irregular arrivals to be returned without effective legal protection. Continue reading >>
0
Grundrechtsdogmatik auf dem Jahrmarkt der Wahrheiten?
Selbstverständlich lässt sich über die Verhältnismäßigkeit einer Impfpflicht streiten. Ute Sacksofsky hat dies jüngst auf diesem Forum engagiert getan. Die Argumente, die sie gegen eine Impfpflicht anführt, sind jedoch befremdlich und entkleiden die Verhältnismäßigkeitsprüfung ihrer Rationalisierungsfunktion. Continue reading >>Taking European Judgments Seriously
Today ends the deadline for stakeholder consultations for the 2022 EU rule of law report. The report is a welcome addition to the EU’s rule of law toolbox but it is missing a vital element: the non-implementation of judgments of international courts, including both the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. Continue reading >>Impfregister statt Datenschutz?
Die Debatte um eine Impfpflicht wirft zwangsläufig die Frage nach einem Impfregister auf. Österreich hat es kürzlich erst eingeführt. Die Politik dagegen ist zwiegespalten. In Deutschland sei ein Impfregister wegen datenschutzrechtlicher Anforderungen nicht umsetzbar, so der Bundesjustizminister Buschmann. Stimmt das eigentlich? Die DSGVO steht einem Impfregister nicht prinzipiell im Weg, stellt daran aber hohe Anforderungen. Ein Impfregister würde die Durchsetzung einer Impfpflicht nicht unbedingt erleichtern, dafür aber viel Zeit in Anspruch nehmen, die es in einer Pandemie nicht gibt. Continue reading >>
0
Decolonization and Human Rights: The Dutch Case
Human rights and decolonization have a complicated relationship. From their inception in the mid-20th century as normative features of the nation-state, human rights co-existed with imperial colonial systems. As aspirational values molded on the Western philosophical tradition, human rights also served as empowering tools in the moment of decolonization while simultaneously hampering claims to national independence. This is why, in the engagement with the ongoing legacies of colonialism, we have embarked on this symposium to examine human rights both as a language of critique and as a constitutive part of the imperial legacy. Continue reading >>Ohne Anhörung ins Gefängnis
Die Kombination aus Ersatzfreiheitsstrafe und Strafbefehlsverfahren kann dazu führen, dass Menschen eine Freiheitsstrafe absitzen, ohne jemals einer Richterin gegenübergestanden zu haben. Das genügt den Verfahrensvoraussetzungen aus dem Grundgesetz nicht und der Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit ist in diesen Fällen verfassungswidrig. Die neue Regierung hat in ihrem Koalitionsvertrag angekündigt, das strafrechtliche Sanktionssystem überarbeiten zu wollen. An dieser Stelle sollte sie mit ihrem Reformvorhaben anknüpfen. Continue reading >>21 January 2022
Allgemeine Impfpflicht – ein kleiner Piks, ein großes verfassungsrechtliches Problem
Wir alle haben die Nase voll von der Pandemie. Je erschöpfter wir sind, desto dringender ist der Wunsch nach einem Wundermittel, das der Pandemie ein Ende bereitet. Doch Impfpflichten sind verfassungsrechtlich nur in engen Grenzen zulässig. In der aktuellen Situation werden diese engen Grenzen verfehlt. Eine Impfpflicht ist kein verfassungsrechtlich zulässiger Weg aus der Pandemie. Continue reading >>Bombe ohne Sprengkraft
Am Mittwoch dieser Woche gab die Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin bekannt, sie habe Ermittlungen wegen des Anfangsverdachts der Untreue (§ 266 StGB) gegen Verantwortliche der Partei Bündnis90/Die Grünen aufgenommen. Boulevardmedien sprechen von einer „politischen Bombe“. Dass sie strafrechtliche Sprengkraft enthält, ist jedoch zu bezweifeln. Das liegt – paradoxerweise – an der Weite des Untreuetatbestandes.
Continue reading >>Keine Waffenlieferungen in Krisengebiete?
Dass Deutschland durch Waffenlieferungen nicht dazu beitragen will, Konflikte anzuheizen, ist ein auf den ersten Blick einleuchtendes Ziel, das in der deutschen, tendenziell militärskeptischen Öffentlichkeit überwiegend Zustimmung findet. Gleichwohl deckt die verfassungs- und auch die völkerrechtliche Perspektive auf diesen Grundsatz deutscher Rüstungsexportpolitik Wertungswidersprüche auf, die die Frage aufwerfen, aus welchen Gründen und mit welcher Zielsetzung Deutschland überhaupt Rüstungsgüter exportiert. Continue reading >>Pushbacks? Egal, wir machen das jetzt so
„Pushback“ ist zum Unwort des Jahres 2021 gekürt worden. Das Wort ist eher unschuldig, die Tat ist das Unding. Die EU-Kommission hat jetzt einen Änderungsvorschlag zum Schengener Grenzkodex vorgelegt, der das ignoriert: Sie schlägt Transfers ohne effektiven Rechtsschutz vor. Continue reading >>
0
Novak Djokovic and the Australian Migration System
The cancellation of tennis star Novak Djokovic’s visa by the Australian government last week highlighted some of the legal contestations and confusion surrounding vaccination mandates, but also gave a glimpse of Australian migration and public law. There is hope that the proceeding will provide some momentum for the reform of its most controversial aspects. Continue reading >>
0
20 January 2022
Curing the Symptoms but not the Disease
Traffic violations are not a proportionate justification to effectively deprive a person of her EU citizenship. This may sound obvious but in reality it was not, as the crucial Grand Chamber case of JY decided on January 18 demonstrates. This is a significant yet predictable addition to the edifice of EU citizenship post-Rottmann. Regrettably, the forward-looking judgment is myopic up to the point of an error of judgement as to the fundamental challenges at play in the factual constellation at hand. Continue reading >>
0
What is Low isn’t Free
Emmanuel Macron’s proposition to raise university tuition fees in France was met with much criticism, including that it would be unconstitutional. Yet, French case law is not very clear on this point. A recent decision of the highest administrative court, the Conseil d’Etat, opens a path for the government to dramatically increase tuition fees. That decision effectively amounted to overturning a landmark preliminary ruling of the French constitutional court, the Conseil Constitutionnel. Continue reading >>
0
19 January 2022
A More Democratic Supreme Court? Not So Fast
The Republican entrenchment in the US Supreme Court and its threat to thwart any meaningful Democratic agenda has prompted a wave of demands to pack the Court and restore its ideological balance. Three divergent conceptions of law and democracy are struggling to define the agenda for the US constitutional system, as playing out in the debate over Supreme Court reform. Continue reading >>The Death of Law and Equity
On the same day, the U.S. Supreme Court issued decisions governing requests for emergency stays of two rules protecting Americans from COVID 19. Both rules relied on very similar statutory language, which clearly authorized protection from threats to health. Both of them presented strikingly bad cases for emergency stays. Yet, the Court granted an emergency stay in one of these cases and denied it in the other. These decisions suggest that the Court applies judicial discretion unguided by law or traditional equitable considerations governing treatment of politically controversial regulatory cases. Continue reading >>17 January 2022
Paper Constitutionalism
On January 16, Serbian citizens voted in a referendum on constitutional changes concerning the guarantees of the judicial independence and organization of the judicial sector. According to preliminary results, 57, 4% of citizens voted for the reforms, while 41,6% voted against, with a turnout of not more than 30% of all registered voters. I would argue that constitutional amendments concerning the judiciary should have been postponed for two reasons. Continue reading >>
0
16 January 2022
All Needs to Stay As It Is so All Can Change
The terms of office of Italian President Sergio Mattarella and German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier will end within few weeks from one another. Yet the two countries could not experience the two deadlines more differently. While the German President's re-election in the first round is certain, in Italy a sort of collective psychodrama has been going on for months. Continue reading >>
0
14 January 2022
Das Zauberwort Verfahrensbeschleunigung
Gleich 21-mal findet sich der Begriff „Beschleunigung“ auf den 36 Seiten der am Dienstag vorgestellten Eröffnungsbilanz Klimaschutz. Der fast inflationäre Gebrauch dieses Zauberworts der deutschen Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft hilft aber nicht darüber hinweg, dass die Pläne von Wirtschafts- und Klimaschutzminister Robert Habeck keine echte Beschleunigungswirkung erhoffen lassen und rechtsstaatlich bedenklich sind. Die neue Bundesregierung fällt damit in alte Muster der Verfahrensbeschleunigung um jeden Preis zurück. Continue reading >>13 January 2022
Open Call: Der Auftrag der Bundesbeauftragten
Regierungsamtliche Diskursteilnahme in Zeiten der Ampel und ihre verfassungsrechtlichen Grenzen: ein Online-Symposium des Verfassungsblogs und des Exzellenzclusters SCRIPTS. Continue reading >>
0
12 January 2022
Versammlungsfreiheit unter Druck
Viele Verwaltungsgerichte haben vor dem allgemeinen Nichtwissen über COVID-19 und planlosen behördlichen Maßnahmen zunächst kapituliert. Es gelang ihnen nur selten, die Versammlungsfreiheit vor einem Substanzverlust zu schützen. Bis heute sind grundsätzliche verfassungsrechtliche Fragen nicht geklärt. Doch schwierige Rechtsfragen über zwei Jahre hinweg als schwierig zu bezeichnen und deshalb nicht zu beantworten, ist in einem Rechtsstaat nicht akzeptabel. Continue reading >>11 January 2022
Restoration without the Constitution
After what is now almost a two-decade long rule by the governing party, there are strong indications that a strong reshuffling in Turkish politics is in the works. Support for President Erdogan and his party is declining. I argue, firstly, that it is a combination of factors that has led to this moment of changing fortunes in Turkish politics – a combination that sheds light on what tactics may successfully be employed by opposition forces who wish to put an end to autocracies. Secondly, I claim that constitutional restoration in Turkey does not require formal constitutional change. Continue reading >>
0
Wer Whistleblower nicht schützt, muss haften
Whistleblower in Deutschland haben es schwer. Bis zum 17. Dezember 2021 hätte der Bundesgesetzgeber Zeit gehabt, die „Whistleblower-Richtlinie“ in nationales Recht umzusetzen. Da er diese Frist untätig hat verstreichen lassen, entfaltet die EU-Richtlinie ihre Wirkung nun unmittelbar. Sie schützt Personen, die Verstöße gegen das Unionsrecht melden und kann zu weitreichenden Haftungsansprüchen gegenüber der Bundesrepublik führen. Continue reading >>
0
10 January 2022
A Missed Opportunity for LGBTQ Rights
A few days ago, the British activist Gareth Lee failed with his complaint before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The Court declared the application inadmissible as Lee had not claimed the violation of rights under the European Convention on Human Rights in any of the national court proceedings and thus had not exhausted all national remedies. Lee v. the United Kingdom really was a missed opportunity for Europe’s regional human rights court to address the issue of homophobia in the context of access to goods and services. Continue reading >>Warum der Rechtsextremist Jens Maier nicht wieder Richter werden darf
Unvorstellbar. Jens Maier – von 2017-2021 Bundestagsabgeordneter der AfD, selbsternannter „kleiner Höcke“, Breivik-Versteher und nach der Einschätzung des sächsischen Verfassungsschutzes Rechtsextremist – will zurück ins Richteramt in Sachsen. Continue reading >>Who’s Afraid of the „Big Bad Court”?
The end of 2021 brought a new chapter in the saga of how should the primacy of the EU law be applied by Romanian courts. A press release of the Romanian Constitutional Court, issued on 23 December 2021, raised concerns about the conformity with the principles set forth in the case law of the CJEU regarding the primacy. The press release, albeit a non-legal document, might have a dissuasive effect upon the judges who would be, otherwise, willing to disapply some norms of internal law, according to the latest judgment of the CJEU on the matter. In Romania, the disregard of the decisions of the Constitutional Court can be a ground for disciplinary action against judges. Continue reading >>
0
07 January 2022
Beware of the Bulldozer
The case of Russia teaches us how dangerous extra-constitutional constitution making can be – and that it should always be just a last resort. No substantive institutional changes should be made outside of the constitutional bounds. Otherwise, there will always be the danger that breaking the rule of law will continue even after constitutional change has taken place. This is precisely what Russian intellectuals and jurists, who supported Yeltsin in 1993, learned under the rule of Vladimir Putin. We should try to avoid repeating their mistakes. Continue reading >>Goat, Cabbage and Wolf
According to a flurry of recent news, snowballed in almost identical form in the Western press, the Romanian Constitutional Court has ruled, just before Christmas, to deny the primacy of EU law. More often than not, analogies with Poland were made, glossing on surface similarities. The juxtaposition is misleading. As the late János Kornai put it, simply because we [i.e., countries in the hinterland, ces pays là-bas] are in the same hospital, that does not mean we suffer from the same sicknesses.
Continue reading >>
0
Pushbacks against the Child’s Best Interests
The lack of a functional EU-level legal framework, designed for high immigration numbers, contributed to increasing recourse to practices of dissuading migrants away from the EU territory. This did not leave the European Court of Human Rights indifferent and it decided to give a legal green light to pushbacks under certain conditions. The Court applies its jurisprudence equally to all individuals and in all situations. In doing so, however, it violates the principle of the child’s best interests. A more nuanced approach should be taken, guaranteeing special protection to children, in accordance with the principle of the child’s best interests. Continue reading >>
0
04 January 2022
Restoring the Validity of Law in Democratic Societies
The questions posed by Professors Andrew Arato and András Sajó in their open letter Restoring Constitutionalism are pressing and of utmost public importance. Many of the issues and controversies raised in the letter arise after “democratic backsliding has taken place” and when the constitution already includes “entrenched authoritarian enclaves”. Taking this context into consideration, I will examine a more basic issue, namely the validity of law in a democratic society. Continue reading >>
0
Nazis im Staatsdienst?
Der Sächsische Verfassungsgerichtshof hat Anfang November 2021 die rückwirkende Einstellung eines führenden Kaders der neonazistischen Kleinstpartei III. Weg zum Rechtsreferendariat angeordnet. Das Gericht hat in dieser Entscheidung einen neuen Maßstab für die Zugangshürden zum juristischen Vorbereitungsdienst gebildet und weicht damit stark von der Rechtsprechungslinie des Bundesverfassungsgerichts ab. Eine Antwort auf Neonazis und rechte Netzwerke im öffentlichen Dienst gibt er damit nicht. Continue reading >>03 January 2022
“Realizing Material Justice”
In 2021, the so called Gesetz zur Herstellung materieller Gerechtigkeit was passed by the German Bundestag. The act, which introduces a new ground for opening up closed criminal court cases, reveals a lack of respect for the formal dimension of the Rechtsstaat. As opposed to the seemingly supreme goal of realizing material justice, the more formal dimensions of the Rechtsstaat seem to be of secondary importance to some actors.
Continue reading >>
0