03 September 2018
My Body, the Majority’s Choice? A Comparative Overview of Abortion Laws in Ireland and Argentina
Both Argentina and Ireland have tried to move forward in the fight for the decriminalization of abortion. In Argentina, even though the approval in the Chamber of Deputies represented a very important step, the Senate majority followed the religious standards and rejected the bill. In Ireland, the referendum resulted in a victory for women. The next step is to enact the new law and, of equal importance, to create all the practical conditions to implement the new rules. Continue reading >>
1 
Spanish Jurisdiction at Stake: Puigdemont’s Judge to be Judged by a Belgian Court?
Tomorrow, a new weird chapter opens up in the „affair Puigdemont“: The Spanish Supreme Court Judge Pablo Llarena, who unsuccessfully issued the European Arrest Warrant against former Catalan premier Carles Puigdemont, is cited before a Belgian court. He is object of a civil lawsuit filed by Puigdemont who accuses the magistrate of a lack of impartiality and violating the presumption of innocence as well as his right to reputation. What is the most astonishing about this lawsuit is the fact that it is a Belgian court which shall judge the professional actions of a Spanish judge. Continue reading >>
0
02 September 2018
The Diciotti Affair: beyond the Populist Farce
After years in which Italy has been the only European country to take seriously the legal obligation to save migrants in the Mediterranean and to accept them on its territory, the Italian government calls for a broader notion of “burden sharing” which involves also a distribution of people and, hence, it proposes to cut off the link between the country of first entry and the obligation to process asylum applications on which the Dublin system relies. At a time when Germany is trying to make the “first country of entry” rule really binding, the Italian position can be hardly dismissed as unreasonable. But there is a serious risk that the current strategy of blackmailing Europe, reiterated in the Diciotti case, will end up compromising the solidity of Italian arguments and eroding the already narrow margins for negotiation in Brussels. Continue reading >>
0
30 August 2018
Schengen Entry Bans for Political Reasons? The Case of Lyudmyla Kozlovska
On 13 August 2018, Lyudmyla Kozlovska, an Ukrainian national and the President of the Open Dialog Foundation (ODF) in Poland, was detained at Brussels airport on the basis of a Polish entry ban reported into the Schengen Information System (SIS II). One day later, the Belgian border authorities deported her to Kiev, Ukraine. This case raises questions on the discretionary power of states to use the SIS II for entry bans on ‘unwanted migrants’ and the obligation of executing states, in this case Belgium, to check the legitimacy or proportionality of these other states decisions. Furthermore, this case illustrates the necessity of effective remedies against decisions reported in large-scale databases such as SIS. Continue reading >>Fighting the Backlash – The South African High Court on the Suspension of the SADC Tribunal
Today, the South African Constitutional Court may have the last word on a case concerning South Africa's suspension of the Southern African Development Community Tribunal. On 1 March 2018, the South African High Court found that this foreign policy decision violated substantive human rights. Even though it is easy to criticize the judgment for its scarce reasoning, the decision entails intriguing ideas for building a more principled foreign relations law in the South African context. Continue reading >>
0
Prosecuting a Judge that Enjoys Diplomatic Immunity: the Case of Judge Aydın Sefa Akay
After the coup attempt on 15 July 2016, more than 80,000 people have been detained in Turkey. One of the most interesting incidents was undoubtedly the arrest of International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals’ (MICT) (former) Judge Aydın Sefa Akay. The main problem in this situation was whether Judge Akay enjoyed diplomatic immunity even from his own State’s jurisdiction. What happened with Judge Akay has manifested the deficiency of international rules regarding the immunity of international judges and, moreover, that said rules must be so articulated that they leave no room for similar incidents in the future. Continue reading >>29 August 2018
VB vom Blatt: Vier kurze Gedanken zum Europaschulen-Beschluss des BVerfG
Verfassungsblog vom Blatt: FRANZ MAYER schreibt auf, was ihm beim Durchlesen des heutigen Europaschulen-Beschlusses des Bundesverfassungsgerichts ein- und auffällt. Continue reading >>Disenfranchised by Accident: the Brexit Initiative and Brits abroad
On the 23rd of July 2018, the European Commission registered a European Citizens’ Initiative called “Permanent European Union Citizenship”, with the objective, in the context of Brexit, to ask the Commission to “propose means to avoid risk of collective loss of EU citizenship and rights, and assure all EU citizens that, once attained, such status is permanent and their rights acquired”. The aim of this initiative is, for British citizens, to retain European Union citizenship post Brexit. However, paradoxically enough, a considerable number of British expats, who are the main concerned, are legally unable to support this initiative (or any other as it turns out) because of a legal conundrum. Continue reading >>27 August 2018
Hund sans scho
„Hund sans scho“ ist in Bayern das höchste Lob für ein Verhalten, das auf mindestens unkonventionelle Weise zum gewünschten Erfolg geführt hat. Besonders wahlkämpfende Politiker lassen sich gern nachsagen, dass‘ fei echt Hund san, weil sie sich mit einer Mischung aus Nachdruck und Bauernschläue für Förderbescheide, Umgehungsstraßen oder ähnlich beliebte Maßnahmen eingesetzt haben. Aber auch der Bayerische Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat das Prinzip verstanden. Er ließ jüngst verlauten, dass man es zur Durchsetzung der bisher schmählich ignorierten Entscheidungen zu Luftreinhalteplänen und Dieselfahrverboten für möglich halte, den Bayerischen Ministerpräsidenten in Zwangshaft zu nehmen. Droht Markus Söder eine Ladung zum Haftantritt in Stadelheim? Continue reading >>26 August 2018
Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? The Right-Wing Populist Surge
Right-wing populists now govern in Turkey, Poland, Hungary, India, South Africa, Israel, and the United States. They are gaining ground in almost every European nation outside of Scandinavia, most notably in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, and Austria. Right-wing populists are weakening the European Union. Even Australia has not been immune to the siren call of a more ethnic and religious nationalism. When empowered, right-wing populists take aim at the inclusive, secular and cosmopolitan commitments of contemporary constitutionalism, and the independent courts designed to foster those commitments. Continue reading >>24 August 2018
New German Intersex Law: Third Gender but not as we want it
The new German draft law to introduce a third option in personal status law has overwhelmingly been decried as a missed historical opportunity, or even as counterproductive, for a variety of reasons. The main criticisms are that the third option does not fully recognize gender diversity as it will only be available to those with a medical diagnosis of an intersex condition, and that the government failed to genuinely consider the alternative option presented by the Constitutional Court – that of scrapping sex/gender registration altogether. Continue reading >>23 August 2018
Von Diensten und Pflichten
Wenige Gespensterdebatten tauchen in der bundesrepublikanischen Öffentlichkeit so regelmäßig auf wie die allgemeine Dienstpflicht für junge Erwachsene, derzeit im Zeichen des Rechtsextremismus, Pflegekräftemangels und der demographischen Alterung. Dabei kommt in der Diskussion ein höchst legitimes Unbehagen an Entsolidarisierung in der Marktgesellschaft zum Ausdruck, das sich aber ein voreiliges Ventil verschafft, statt zu den Gründen der Misere vorzustoßen. Dass die allgemeine Dienstpflicht unter dem geltenden Grundgesetz rechtlich nicht zulässig, im Wege der Verfassungsänderung aber möglich wäre, ist daher das geringere Problem einer politisch befremdlichen Debatte. Continue reading >>Why the Polish Supreme Court’s Reference on Judicial Independence to the CJEU is Admissible after all
On August 2nd 2018, the Polish Supreme Court has referred questions to the European Court of Justice about whether or not the forced retirement of most of its senior judges and other infringements of judicial independence are compatible with EU law. That decision is a landmark step in the serious constitutional crisis in Poland that has been going on for several years. One issue is of fundamental importance: Is the SC’s preliminary reference to the CJEU admissible? Continue reading >>18 August 2018
Zwischen Supreme Court und Zentralregierung: Zur drohenden Staatenlosigkeit der muslimischen Minderheit in Assam
Ende Juli hat die Zentralregierung in Delhi ein neues Bürgerregister für den Bundesstaat Assam veröffentlicht, in welchem sich nicht alle Einwohner des indischen Bundesstaates wiederfinden. Ein Großteil derer, die auf der Liste fehlen, gehört der muslimischen Minderheit an. Ihnen droht die Festsetzung in Camps, der Entzug politischer Rechte, Abschiebung oder gar Staatenlosigkeit. Der Fall, dessen Historie bis in die Zeit der Unabhängigkeitsbewegungen zurückreicht, zeigt, dass gegenwärtig in Indien Ressentiments gegen ursprünglich Geflüchtete einer bestimmten religiösen Minderheit wieder aufleben und rechtlich verfestigt werden. Continue reading >>
0
Seenotrettung als völkerrechtliche Pflicht: Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Massenmigrationsbewegungen über das Mittelmeer
Ein sicherer Ort ist mehr als nur trockener Boden unter den Füßen. Es steht außer Frage, dass Libyen die Anforderungen an einen sicheren Ort für die geretteten Migranten nicht erfüllt. Die Praxis italienischer staatlicher Schiffe, Boote mit Migranten entweder so lange an der Weiterfahrt zu hindern, bis sie von der libyschen Küstenwache aufgenommen werden oder aber die aus Seenot geretteten Personen selbst nach Libyen zurückzubringen und dort auszuschiffen, ist ein klarer Verstoß gegen völkerrechtliche Verpflichtungen. Continue reading >>17 August 2018
The 2018 French Asylum and Immigration Act
As many others in the European Union, the French government attempts to tackle the so-called “migrants crisis”. A new bill aims at reducing the length of asylum proceedings and fighting against irregular migration. Despite disagreements between the two chambers, the National Assembly has adopted the last version of the bill on August 1st. Left-wing Members of Parliament have brought an action before the Constitutional Council. The bill may not be enacted before the Council has given its decision, at the beginning of September. The text will no longer change, unless some provisions are deemed unconstitutional. Continue reading >>Facebook’s Efforts to Squash Scrutiny of the EU-US Privacy Shield
Currently, Facebook is before the Supreme Court in Ireland asking to curtail judicial powers that allow courts to refer questions on the EU-US Privacy Shield Agreement to the CJEU. This is part of an ongoing litigation of Max Schrems, who was still an Austrian law student at the start of the litigation, against the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) in the jurisdiction of Ireland where Facebook currently holds its EU headquarters for tax and company law purposes. The litigation has the capacity to change the face of the transatlantic relationship, not least now, at a critical juncture of fragility and uncertainty and represents an extraordinary step. Continue reading >>
0
15 August 2018
Secessionism, Federalism and Constitutionalism in Ethiopia
On the morning of 4 August 2018, troops were seen taking over key positions in Jijiga, a capital city of the State of Somali, one of the constituent units of the Ethiopian federation. Heavily armed military vehicles were stationed outside the state parliament, the offices of state government and the state TV station. It was not an invasion by a foreign force. It was a federal intervention. Continue reading >>
0
08 August 2018
The Rule of Law Crisis in Poland: A New Chapter
The current controversies on the Polish Supreme Court resemble the conflict over the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015-216 to some extent. However, the Supreme Court took new steps on August 2, when it referred five questions to the Court of Justice of the EU and requested a preliminary ruling. All five questions relate (more or less directly) to the principles of (1) independence of the courts and (2) the judicial independence under the circumstances of the rule of law crisis in Poland and thus have a potential of becoming a key aspect in the Polish rule of law crisis. Continue reading >>Democratic Decay Resource (DEM-DEC): First Monthly Bibliography Update-August 2018
The DEM-DEC Bibliography presents a global range of research on democratic decay. It has a strong focus on research by public lawyers – spanning constitutional, international and transnational law – but also includes key research from political science, as well as policy texts. First monthly update since DEM-DEC was launched. Updates to the Bibliography will be issued on the first Monday of each month. Continue reading >>
0
07 August 2018
Kirchenasyl – staatliche Eskalation aus Opportunismus?
Nach hitziger Diskussion mit Scharia-Vergleichen und Ähnlichem hatten sich Staat und Kirche im Februar 2015 auf ein gemeinsames Verfahren beim Kirchenasyl geeinigt. Dieser kooperative Umgang wurde jahrelang positiv evaluiert. Nun aber verschärft die staatliche Seite den Ton. Das Kirchenasyl wird laut Innenministerkonferenz in „Teilen der Öffentlichkeit zunehmend kritisch gesehen“. Wohl daher verständigten sich die Innenminister darauf, den staatlichen Umgang mit dem Kirchenasyl ab dem 1.8.2018 zu ändern und ernst zu machen mit einer Drohung, die schon länger im Raum stand: Unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen wird sich das BAMF künftig auf die 18-monatige Überstellungsfrist nach Art. 29 Abs. 2 S. 2 Dublin III-VO berufen. Continue reading >>05 August 2018
Holocaust, Meinungsfreiheit und Sonderrechtsverbot – BVerfG erklärt § 130 III StGB für verfassungsgemäß
Ist der Straftatbestand der Holocaust-Leugnung verfassungswidriges Sonderrecht „gegen rechts“? Diese Frage war bislang heftig umstritten – und durch die Senatsrechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts jedenfalls noch nicht ausdrücklich entschieden. Jetzt beantwortet das Gericht diese Frage per Kammerentscheidung mit Nein. Continue reading >>03 August 2018
Drawing Red Lines and Giving (Some) Bite – the CJEU’s Deficiencies Judgment on the European Rule of Law
The illiberal turn in Europe has many facets. Of particular concern are Member States in which ruling majorities uproot the independence of the judiciary. For reasons well described in the Verfassungsblog, the current focus is on Poland. Since the Polish development is emblematic for a broader trend, more is at stake than the rule of law in that Member State alone (as if that were not enough). If the Polish emblematic development is not resisted, illiberal democracies might start co-defining the European constitutional order, in particular, its rule of law-value in Article 2 TEU. Accordingly, the conventional liberal self-understanding of Europe could easily erode, with tremendous implications. Continue reading >>02 August 2018
Bulgaria’s Constitutional Troubles with the Istanbul Convention
On July 27th Bulgaria's Constitutional Court ruled that the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence, also known as the Istanbul Convention, contradicted Bulgaria’s Constitution. The decision may cause a stir among Western commentators not only because of its result, but also because of its peculiar legal arguments and untidy, repetitive narrative. Continue reading >>The CJEU Has Spoken Out, But the Show Must Go On
In a nutshell, I argue that despite several conceptual problems in CJEU’s understanding of judicial independence, it showed a healthy dose of judicial statesmanship in Celmer. As neither the preliminary reference procedure nor the fundamental right to the fair trial are good “vehicles” for addressing the Polish structural judicial reforms, there is a limit what the CJEU could do. The foundations of judicial independence are political and thus the real constitutional moment will be the combo of the next Polish parliamentary and presidential elections. Continue reading >>
0
Von Schleusen, Wehren und ihren Wärtern: Zur mündlichen Verhandlung des EuGH in der Rechtssache Weiss u.a.
Verstößt das Programm der Europäischen Zentralbank zum Ankauf von Wertpapieren des öffentlichen Sektors gegen das Verbot der monetären Haushaltsfinanzierung nach Art. 123 AEUV? Handelt sie damit gar außerhalb ihres währungspolitischen Mandats? Diese und weitere Fragen hatte der Europäische Gerichtshof am 10. Juli 2018 in der mündlichen Verhandlung in der Rechtssache Weiss u.a. (C-493/17) zu klären. Continue reading >>01 August 2018
Neues vom Glossator (16): In zerstreuter Verfassung
Über Konzentration und Zerstreuung, Urkunde und Schrift, Lerche und Isensee. Continue reading >>Wachgeküsst: Der französische Verfassungsrat aktiviert erstmals die Fraternité – im Ausländerrecht
Am 6. Juli 2018 entschied der französische Verfassungsrat, dass die Regelungen über die Strafbarkeit von Menschen, die Ausländer ohne Rechtsstatus unterstützen, zum Teil verfassungswidrig sind. Dabei bezog sich der Verfassungsrat erstmals auf den Verfassungsgrundsatz der Brüderlichkeit. Was sagt eigentlich die deutsche Verfassung über Brüderlichkeit bzw. über Solidarität im Ausländerstrafrecht (§§ 95, 96 Aufenthaltsgesetz)? Continue reading >>31 July 2018
Vertrauen hat Grenzen: Die Schlussanträge zu Ibrahim u.a. und Jawo
Seit 25. Juli liegen die Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts Wathelet in den Rechtssachen Ibrahim u.a. und Jawo vor. Sie übertragen die bisherige EuGH-Rechtsprechung zu den zielstaatsbezogenen Grenzen von Dublin-Überstellungen auf weitere Konstellationen und enthalten eine spannende Weiterentwicklung des europäischen Flüchtlingsschutzes. Continue reading >>
0
Shifting towards a democratic-authoritarian state: Israel’s new Nation-State Law
The 'Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People' was passed by the Knesset on July 19, 2018. The Basic Law purports to entrench the identity of the state as a Jewish state. As this Article is being written several petitions against the Basic Law are being prepared and will be submitted to the Supreme Court. The Court however may find it very difficult to declare the Basic Law void. Continue reading >>
0
30 July 2018
Drawing Red Lines With No (Significant) Bite – Why an Individual Test Is Not Appropriate in the LM Case
It can be argued that the individual assessment required by the Aranyosi judgment is not the proper test in the LM case due to three reasons. Firstly, regular control reverses the logic of the mutual trust developed by the CJEU. Secondly, there is a substantial difference between fundamental rights and the independence of judiciary. Infringements of the latter require other legal mechanisms of protection. Thirdly, the Polish institutional changes affecting judicial independence may influence all 26 EU acts providing for mutual recognition of judgments. A broader perspective should be taken. Continue reading >>
0
29 July 2018
The CJEU in the Celmer case: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back for Upholding the Rule of Law Within the EU
Surrender cases are litmus tests for the EU’s approach towards the enforcement of the rule of law in the Member States. Without judicial independence and other elements of the rule of law concept, EU law will cease to be operational, whether in the context of the single market or outside of it. Aranyosi and LM are the beginning of a long journey. In a more general sense, these cases demonstrate that ultimately – as in all incomplete constitutional systems – it is the courts which play a crucial role in carving out and applying rule of law and fundamental rights exceptions. Continue reading >>
0
28 July 2018
Rule of Law Retail and Rule of Law Wholesale: The ECJ’s (Alarming) “Celmer” Decision
A craving for the rule of law can be satisfied in two ways. You can invoke it legally through a case-by-case checking of its presence in any particular instance (though of course, retail assessment means you’re at the mercy of the court near you) or you can better guarantee a steady and plentiful delivery by contracting wholesale, thus providing a legal constraint on the supplier’s ability to deviate. This week’s decision of the European Court of Justice in the “Celmer” case (Case C-216/18 PPU, Minister for Justice and Equality v LM) tells us that the rule of law is now available retail in the European Union, but it is not now – and probably can never be – available wholesale. Continue reading >>
0
How to Assess the Independence of Member State Courts?
Immediately after it was published, the judgment in Case C‑216/18 PPU Minister for Justice and Equality v. LM generated many varied assessments in Poland. Some commentators treated the judgment as a general vote of no confidence against the Polish judiciary whilst others (including the Minister of Justice) found it to be a defeat of the Irish court. The judgment is used as an argument in current political disputes. Leaving aside, however, the aforementioned determinants, it is to be concluded that because of its approach to certain significant issues, the judgment does not yield to an unequivocal interpretation, and its actual consequences are still hard to anticipate. Continue reading >>
0
Individuals and Judges in Defense of the Rule of Law
In many ways, this case illustrates EU constitutionalism at its best: despite not being obliged to do so, the Irish judge made a request under Article 267 TFEU, bringing together concerns raised by the pending Article 7 TEU procedure and the more technical and narrow issue of fair trial under Article 47 EU Charter. While the ECJ follows the path opened in Aranyosi for assessing the ‘real risk of breach’ under Article 47 EU Charter, in interpreting that provision it manages to weave in the wider Article 7 TEU contextual concerns as well, thereby considerably strengthening the constitutional status of the right to a fair trial. Continue reading >>
0
Standpunktlosigkeit ist keine Option
Der Tonfall der politischen Debatten ist schärfer geworden und zwar gerade, was das Recht und besonders was das Flüchtlingsrecht betrifft. Das Recht und vor allem die Verfassung angesichts dieser Polarisierung als Grundlage sachlicher Debatten hochzuhalten, ist richtig. Falsch ist es zu meinen, rechtliche Analyse komme ohne einen Standpunkt aus. Wir brauchen ein Bewusstsein über das Menschliche in jedem Urteilen, damit wir zur Kritik unserer eigenen Sichtweise fähig und uns der Verantwortung des Urteilens bewusst sind. Continue reading >>27 July 2018
We Still Haven’t Found What We’re Looking For
The diagnosis is grim. So, the CJEU should have done something! If the political class is reluctant, the law in the hands of the CJEU must be put to play. The conventional narrative has it that this has always been the case. This was the gist of the hope laid in the anticipated LM case. The CJEU has not lived up to those high expectations. This is not a landmark ruling and neither will its impact be of seismic constitutional proportions. The reason for that is, as we shall see, not the reluctance of the CJEU to address the problem seriously, but a plain fact that the expectations have been simply too high. While this is, most likely, as good as it can judicially get, the LM decision has still not brought us what we have been looking for. Nevertheless, we might be at least an inch closer toward that goal. Continue reading >>
0
A new chapter in Israel’s “constitution”: Israel as the Nation State of the Jewish People
In the very last day of the Knesset’s summer session, on July 19th 2018, the Israeli Knesset passed a new Basic Law stating that Israel is the Nation State of the Jewish people. Supporters of this Basic Law claim that it simply states the obvious: Israel was established as a refuge and a homeland for the Jewish people. Still, the Basic Law is very problematic. Not because of what is included within it, but mainly for what is missing from it: the idea of a democratic state and the principle of equality. Continue reading >>26 July 2018
Afraid of Their Own Courage? Some Preliminary Reflections on LM
The much-awaited judgment in the case LM (also known as Celmer) is a landmark decision. The European Court of Justice acknowledged for the very first time that the essence of the right to a fair trial prohibits, under certain circumstances, the surrender of individuals from one EU Member State to another. Against the backdrop of the rule of law crisis in Poland and elsewhere, this acknowledgment is certain to be seen as a big step towards strengthening the rule of law in Europe. At the same time, the decision falls short of the expectations of those who wanted the Court of Justice to assess the independence of the Polish judiciary in substance. Continue reading >>25 July 2018
Freiheitsentziehung in der Freiheitsentziehung? Die BVerfGE-Entscheidung zur Fixierung in der öffentlich-rechtlichen Unterbringung
Kann es eine Freiheitsentziehung in der Freiheitsentziehung geben? Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat diese Frage in seiner Entscheidung zur Fixierung von Patienten in der öffentlich-rechtlichen Unterbringung eindeutig bejaht. Daraus folgt ein zwingender Richtervorbehalt für Fixierungen. Dies überzeugt im Ergebnis, die Begründung aber ist hemdsärmelig und schränkt die Landesgesetzgeber unnötig ein. Continue reading >>24 July 2018
„Do not go. Do not vote“: an Interview with WOJCIECH SADURSKI
The Polish President Andrzej Duda has announced a referendum about the reform of the Polish Constitution of 1997. According to Wojciech Sadurski, the questions he intends to ask the Polish people are either meaningless, redundant or downright detrimental - with one important exception. Continue reading >>23 July 2018
Sandu and Others v Russia and Moldova: The High Costs of Occupation
On 17 July 2018, the European Court on Human Rights reminded again that occupation of foreign lands and support of separatist regimes is a costly affair. This cost is not only calculated in terms of monetary repercussions but also in terms of reputational losses. On that day the chamber of the Court delivered a judgment in the case of Sandu and Others v Russia and Moldova. This judgment is a new one in the line of cases dealing with a breakaway region of Moldova – the self-proclaimed Republic of Transnistria. Continue reading >>
0
Fast Random-Access Memory (Laws) – The June 2018 Amendments to the Polish “Holocaust Law”
On June 27th Polish authorities broke the national record in speed of proceeding a bill in Parliament and getting it signed into the law by the President. And we are not talking about just an ordinary bill. The statute in question is the (in)famous Polish “Holocaust bill” or “Polish death camp law”. Continue reading >>
0
Neues vom Glossator (15): Fußnoten verfassen
So, wie Unterscheidungen etwas spalten, sind Fußnoten auch Teile eines gespaltenen Textes. Sie arbeiten an der Normativität mit. Ich mache das als Glossator, also an einem beispielhaften Text. Continue reading >>
0
20 July 2018
Are National Governments Liable if They Miss Their Relocation Quota of Refugees?
Last week, the Spanish Supreme Court declared that between 2015 and 2017 the Government of Spain had failed to relocate 19.449 refugees from Greece and Italy. The Court considered in its Judgement of 9th July of 2018 that Spain was bound by two Council Decisions of May and September 2015 establishing an EU Emergency Relocation Mechanism aimed at distributing some of the refugees that arrived at their coasts during the so-called ‘refugee crisis’. The relocation mechanism included a table with the number of refugees Member States were obliged to accommodate in their own international protection systems (‘quota’). Continue reading >>
0
The Curious Case of Article 299 of the Turkish Penal Code: Insulting the Turkish President
Judgments by the Strasbourg Court are binding on Turkey and furthermore are the primary source for interpreting the European Convention of Human Rights, a treaty to which Turkey is party and which, according to Article 90 of the Turkish Constitution, prevails over national laws such as Article 299 of the Turkish Penal Code on insulting the President, in the event of conflict. ECtHR jurisprudence clearly indicates such a conflict between Article 299 and the Convention. But are Turkish courts aware of this? Continue reading >>19 July 2018
Gegenleistung für einen „gesamtgesellschaftlichen Vorteil“: Das BVerfG-Urteil zum Rundfunkbeitrag
Der Erste Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts hat die Vorschriften über den Rundfunkbeitrag für im wesentlichen verfassungsgemäß erklärt. Lediglich die Höherbelastung von Inhabern von mehr als einer Wohnung sei mit Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar. Die verfassungsrichterliche Wertschätzung für den öffentlichrechtlichen Rundfunk ist im Grundton des Urteils deutlich hörbar, kann aber nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, daß die Argumentation nicht in allen ihren Teilen überzeugt. Continue reading >>18 July 2018
Germany’s Moral Responsibility to Support a Treaty on Business and Human Rights
In a massive conglomeration called the Treaty Alliance, leading human rights NGOs around the world together with many luminary academics are calling for a treaty between states on business and human rights that would seek to prevent human rights violations by businesses from occurring and ensure they do not go unpunished, or at least uncompensated. Such a treaty is necessary given the need to address a number of problems in international law that have prevented victims of human rights violations from being able to gain remedies against errant corporations. Continue reading >>17 July 2018