01 June 2018
Das Märchen von der Freiheit des Internets – erste Eindrücke zum DE-CIX-Urteil des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts
Die oft beschworene Freiheit des Internets erweist sich in ihrer Pauschalität wahrhaftig als Märchen. Verloren ist sie damit aber noch nicht. Dies dürfte auch die DE-CIX ermutigen, gegen das Leipziger Urteil Verfassungsbeschwerde zu erheben. Angriffspunkte bieten sich jedenfalls zu Genüge. Continue reading >>
1 
31 May 2018
The “Savona Affaire”: Overconstitutionalization in Action?
As is well known, Italy is undergoing an institutional crisis sparked by President Mattarella’s veto on the composition of the prospective Italian government. Following Dieter Grimm, we claim that the events here analysed reveal the extent to which the EU legal framework is overconstitutionalised and the democratic costs and risks inherent in this legal and political order. Continue reading >>
28 May 2018
Why the Italian President’s Decision was Legitimate
The new Italian government is unlikely to find a majority in Parliament; it will probably be a short-term, neutral caretaker, until the new elections, which may take place as soon as next autumn. The impeachment procedure against the President – should it start at all – will end in nothing, although it might stir the electoral propaganda. Continue reading >>The People vs. the Elite: Italian Dialectics and the European Malaise
Has the Italian President power of veto over the choice of the ministers of the government? Some argue that the Constitution does not allow Mattarella to go against the indications of the winning parties and should respect the will of the majority of the electorate, and should abstain from interfering with the political choices of the future Prime Minister. These considerations are not correct and follow from a superficial reading of the Constitution. Continue reading >>“A Bad Workman always Blames his Tools”: an Interview with LAURENT PECH
Constitutional capture in Poland and Hungary and what to expect from the European Commission, the Council and the Court of Justice: an interview with Laurent Pech. Continue reading >>
25 May 2018
Transnational Partisanship vs Transnational Democracy
The European Parliament has called for he creation of a European cross-border constituency, a transnational list of candidates from across the continent. This idea, recently popularised by French president Emmanuel Macron, has been gutted by the European People's Party, though – a move which could itself be seen as a powerful manifestation of the importance of transnational partisanship in the EU. Continue reading >>
23 May 2018
Caviar, Corruption and Compliance – New Challenges for the Council of Europe
Compliance with judicial decisions often poses challenges, all the more so when international courts such as the European Court of Human Rights are involved. How to react to a failure to abide by judgments of the ECHR has been a question for the Council of Europe for some time. But the suspicious background of a currently unfolding episode involving Azerbaijan may offer an unusually clear justification for a strong reaction even to a single case of non-compliance. Continue reading >>Crossing the Rubicon
During the last weeks, a group of Greek anarchists that go by the name of Rubicon has attacked the Council of State and a number of other public buildings. So pervasive is the activity of this group of disruptors that it has become the background to a new normality in Greece. Rubicon is not a terrorist group, it is not a political party, it is not a group of vigilante Robin Hoods. It is the symptom of a disease. The disease is the brutalisation of a frustrated, enraged society that hates everyone and also hates itself. Continue reading >>
22 May 2018
Ethnocentric Mambo in Catalonia
Catalonia is a fragile object. As in many other places, history has assembled fragments without completely fusing them, leaving behind scars that remind us of the effort required to join what is diverse. These scars demand special attention because, contrary to societies where the wounds that produced them are old and almost forgotten, in Catalonia many of the wounds were still suppurating just a few decades ago. As they do now. For months, we have been at risk of tearing them open. Continue reading >>
21 May 2018
Save the Constitution!
India's oppositional Congress party wants to impeach Dipak Misra, the Chief Justice of India, who stands accused of allocating cases to the respective benches at his own, politically right-leaning whim. In its fight against the governing BJP party, the Congress party has launched a "Save the Constitution!" campaign. Unfortunately, its leader Rahul Ghandi's family has a history of entanglement with the constitution of its own. Continue reading >>
0
Kundin oder Kunde – Geschlechtergerechte Sprache revisited
Vor gut zwei Monaten hat der Bundesgerichtshof sein Urteil zur geschlechtergerechten Sprache in Bankformularen gefällt und damit eine Menge Aufregung erzeugt. Jetzt liegen die Urteilsgründe vor. Obwohl schon viel Sinnvolles zu diesem Urteil geschrieben wurde, lohnt dennoch ein erneuter Blick aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht auf die Argumente, mit denen das oberste deutsche Zivilgericht der 80-jährigen Klägerin das Recht darauf verneint, als „Kundin“ angesprochen zu werden und nicht als „Kunde“. Continue reading >>
20 May 2018
Nicht nur eine Frage der Finanzierung: Karlsruhe verhandelt zum Rundfunkbeitrag
Dass das Bundesverfassungsgericht letzte Woche zum Rundfunkbeitrag zwei Tage mündlich verhandelt hat, überrascht auch vor dem Hintergrund, dass das Bundesverwaltungsgericht alle relevanten Fragen schon geprüft hatte. Wenn das Gericht nun doch grundsätzlicher prüft, stellen sich im Wesentlichen zwei Fragen: Ist der Beitrag in der aktuellen Ausgestaltung wirklich als Gegenleistung für den individuell zurechenbaren Vorteil anzusehen, die öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkprogramme empfangen zu können? Und wird dieser Vorteil verlässlich erfasst, wenn die Beitragspflicht einzig darauf abstellt, dass jemand eine Wohnung unterhält? Continue reading >>
18 May 2018
There is No Such Thing As a Particular „Center and Eastern European Constitutionalism“
After a new landslide electoral victory by the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, a fresh perspective on constitutional developments in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has started taking shape. It could be described as constitutional appeasement. The argument goes that given a widespread popular support for the constitutionally backsliding regimes in Hungary, Poland as well as elsewhere, we should start examining our own theoretical premises from which we have been observing and evaluating the developments in CEE. Perhaps, there is not everything wrong with CEE political and institutional developments? Continue reading >>
0
Dashcams: Wenn die ZPO erlaubt, was das Datenschutzrecht verbietet
Mit Dashcams den Verkehr aufzuzeichnen, kann nach einem Unfall in einem zivilrechtlichen Haftpflichtprozess sehr nützlich sein - obwohl man das datenschutzrechtlich eigentlich nicht darf. Der BGH hat in dieser Woche zwei rechtliche Problemlagen geklärt, die deutsche Gerichte seit geraumer Zeit beschäftigt haben: Zum einen betrifft dies die datenschutzrechtliche Zulässigkeit des Einsatzes von Dashcams im öffentlichen Verkehrsraum. Zum anderen deren zivilprozessuale Verwertbarkeit, insbesondere wenn die Aufnahmen rechtswidrig erfolgten. Continue reading >>
17 May 2018
The Białowieża case. A Tragedy in Six Acts
In the judgment of 18th of April 2018 the European Court of Justice has ruled (unsurprisingly) that by carrying on logging activities on the UNESCO-protected Białowieża Forest, Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law. In the Białowieża case the process of judicialization of the EU governance called for a concerted action and dual commitments: from the Court and the Commission. The Court did its part, Commission failed and reverted to its bad ways from the past: negotiating with the government who has been giving short shrift to the Commission and to the core values of the EU law for two years and will continue doing that under the pretense of striving for a compromise with the EU. The Commission continues to be missing one crucial element: the politics of resentment are not just one-off aberration. Continue reading >>
0
15 May 2018
From DNA Tracing to DNA Phenotyping – Open Legal Issues and Risks in the new Bavarian Police Task Act (PAG) and beyond
Is Germany facing a tidal shift in police powers? Does the border between the prosecution of criminal offences and the prevention of looming dangers, which has so far been regarded as self-evident and constitutionally necessary, fall? Will people who are suspected of maybe committing crimes in the future only on the basis of statistical data or non-individualized investigative approaches be preventively restricted in their fundamental rights and even imprisoned in the long term? Is Germany on the way to comprehensive predictive policing, for which considerable risks of discrimination will be accepted? These questions arise from the critics of the draft act on police tasks, which the Bavarian state government intends to pass this week. Beside drones and online seizure one of the crucial investigative issues is the so called “DNA phenotyping”. Continue reading >>The Israeli Override Clause and the Future of Israeli Democracy
The recent proposals to enact an override clause to the Israeli Basic Law; Human Dignity and Liberty has triggered a fierce public debate in Israeli legal and political circles. Under this proposal, the Knesset could reenact a statute that was declared void by the courts. As is characteristic of such debates, the proponents and opponents of the override clause claim to defend democracy, strengthen the protection of rights and defend restore the proper balance between different branches of government. The purpose of this post is to explain the background of this debate and evaluate the pros and cons of the override clause in the Israeli context. Continue reading >>
0
14 May 2018
Judges under Attack in Hungary
Judges seem to irritate the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán who likes to talk officially about “the judicial state” and irresponsible judges. Despite many problems with judicial autonomy and practice, judicial independence itself has remained relatively intact from overt political influence so far. More precisely: the governing party and its friends could not completely rely on the courts to get favorable decisions. For example, governmental bodies have regularly lost cases initiated by civil legal organizations for the release of public information. That, however, might change after Orbán’s latest electoral victory. Continue reading >>
0
13 May 2018
10 Facts on Poland for the Consideration of the European Court of Justice
In June, the European Court of Justice is to decide whether, despite massive legislative changes, the Polish judiciary is still independent and therefore able to ensure a fair trial to people extradited to Poland on the basis of a European Arrest Warrant. Marcin Matczak, a Polish lawyer, uses the old tradition of the amicus curiae letter – a letter from a friend of the court – to depict the situation of the Polish judiciary in 2018. Continue reading >>
11 May 2018
“Passive Indoctrination” as a Terrorist Offense in Spain – A Regression from Constitutional Rights?
Spanish counter-terrorist legislation was originally aimed at fighting local terrorism of a nationalist nature. In Spain, the phenomenon was so present during the constituent process that the Constitution itself included a provision that allows certain fundamental rights to be suspended for specific persons, “in relation to the investigations corresponding to the actions of armed bands or terrorist elements” (art. 55.2 EC –Spanish Constitution-). Continue reading >>
0
The Case Law of the Bundesverfassungsgericht on Counterterrorist Measures
Ever since 9/11, a multitude of laws against terrorism have been adopted, both on the federal level and on the level of the Länder (which in Germany are mainly responsible for the police). The 2002 “Law on suppression of international terrorism” was only the first of many to follow: immediately after 9/11, the Federal Ministry of the Interior seized the opportunity to introduce counterterrorist measures that had been on its agenda for quite some time. Continue reading >>
0
10 May 2018
Excesses of Counter-Terrorism and Constitutional Review in France: The Example of the Criminalisation of the Consultation of Websites
In the span of three years, France has adopted no [...] Continue reading >>
0
09 May 2018
China’s Constitution and the People’s War on Terror
When HU Bo posted his tweet in July 2014, he [...] Continue reading >>Ein Feiertag für Europa
Vor einigen Wochen wurde bekannt, dass der Berliner Senat die Einführung eines neuen gesetzlichen Feiertags plant. Laut dem Regierenden Bürgermeister Michael Müller soll es sich dabei um einen Anlass handeln, „der eine politische Relevanz in unserer Geschichte hat“. Welcher Tag es genau sein wird, ist allerdings noch offen. Das Blog Der (europäische) Föderalist hat zusammen mit The European Moment einen Aufruf initiiert, diesen künftigen Berliner Feiertag auf den Europatag am 9. Mai zu legen. Continue reading >>The State of Emergency, Non-Refoulement and the Turkish Constitutional Court
There is almost not a day that passes without terrorism [...] Continue reading >>
0
08 May 2018
Leges fugitivae: Wie Recht verschwindet
In Österreich vollzieht sich leise und beinahe unbemerkt die größte „Rechtsbereinigung“ seiner Geschichte. Alle Gesetze, die vor dem 1. Jänner 2000 verabschiedet wurden und weiterhin in Geltung bleiben sollen, werden im Anhang des Entwurfs zum Zweiten Bundesrechtsbereinigungsgesetz aufgelistet. Diese Liste umfasst 224 Seiten. Was nicht in diesem Katalog aufgenommen wird, soll seine Geltung verlieren. Mit Ordnungsliebe allein lässt sich dieses Projekt kaum erklären. Continue reading >>
0
State Secrecy in Counterterrorism: Different Judicial Standards of Review – The Abu Omar Case before Italian Courts
State secrecy provides an interesting viewpoint on national and supranational [...] Continue reading >>
0
Is Travel to Syrian Warfare a Terrorist Crime? The Finnish Case
On 24 January 2018, the Helsinki District Court of 24 January 2018 ruled on an alleged plan by three Muslim men, all Finnish nationals, to travel to Syria and join the ongoing armed conflict there. The prosecutor chose to base the charges on Section 2, Preparation of an offence to be committed with terrorist aim, under the construction that joining the armed opposition forces in Syria so as to engage in hostilities against the official army of the al-Assad regime, could have resulted in death or injury to members of the Syrian military forces. Continue reading >>
07 May 2018
Mit dreierlei Maß – Ellwangen und das Rechtsstaatsverständnis der Deutschen
Wer am Wochenende die politische Debatte und auf Twitter den Hashtag #Ellwangen verfolgt hat, könnte den Eindruck gewinnen Deutschland stehe kurz vor einem Bürgerkrieg. Dabei hatten Flüchtlinge nur versucht, die Überstellung ihres Mitbewohners im Rahmen des Dubliner-Zuständigkeitssystems nach Italien zu verhindern, ein Akt des zivilen Ungehorsams. Was immer in Ellwangen tatsächlich passiert ist, eines zeigt dieser Vorfall ganz deutlich: In Deutschland wird der Rechtsstaat mit dreierlei Maß gemessen. Continue reading >>The Right to Fair Trial and the Rise of Sensitive Intelligence Evidence: Responses from the Dutch and UK Courts
Writing extra-judicially, Lord Justice Brown once described the typical court [...] Continue reading >>
0
Courts and Counter-Terrorism: the Last Line of Defence?
Terrorism is all over the news these days but not [...] Continue reading >>
0
A Constitutional Referendum to Delegitimize the Constitution
President Andrzej Duda has just announced that on 10 and 11 November a referendum will be held in Poland on the need to amend the Constitution, in which he will put to the Polish people numerous questions arising from ongoing public consultations. This consultative referendum is an attempt to delegitimise the Constitution, on which the referendum’s own legitimacy is based. Continue reading >>
0
06 May 2018
Choosing between two Evils: the Polish Ombudsman’s Dilemma
The Polish legislator has adopted several controversial anti-terror and surveillance laws recently. Ombudsman Adam Bodnar had had applied for constitutional review before the Constitutional Tribunal – but the cases were assigned to panels that included unconstitutionally elected "anti-judges". Therefore, he decided to withdraw the application. But that is not the end of the story. Continue reading >>
0
Staatlicher „Hygienepranger“ vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht
Die Behörden müssen die Öffentlichkeit informieren, wenn der Verdacht besteht, dass in Lebensmitteln zulässige Grenzwerte überschritten oder qualifiziert verbraucherschützende Regelungen verletzt werden. Diese Regelung dient nicht der Warnung und Gefahrenabwehr, sondern der Verbraucherinformation. Der Erste Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts hat sie jetzt im Verfahren einer abstrakten Normenkontrolle für teilweise verfassungswidrig erklärt. Sie ist insoweit mit Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar, als die Veröffentlichung nicht zeitlich begrenzt ist. Continue reading >>
0
05 May 2018
Libanon im Wahlfieber
Am 6.Mai 2018 werden die Libanesen zur Wahlurne gebeten – gewählt wurde zuletzt im Jahre 2009. Ein Blick auf die politischen und geschichtlichen Hintergründe des Zedernstaates. Continue reading >>
0
04 May 2018
Deflection of Asylum Seekers to Ghettos in Third Countries?
One of the reform ideas of the Common European Asylum System is to enforce the deflection of asylum seekers to non-European countries. The designation of a third country as a safe third country may be made with exceptions for specific parts of its territory. That could cover the transfer of asylum seekers to an unstable third state, when a protection zone of the size of a refugee camp has been brought under control and asylum seekers are held there with their subsistence secured. This post aims at questioning the compatibility of this new scheme with the Geneva Convention and at eliciting a debate on it. Continue reading >>
0
The Danish Institute for Human Rights and the Copenhagen Declaration – a Reply to Helga Molbæk-Steensig
In her blog post “Is Something Rotten in the State of Denmark?”, Helga Molbæk-Steensig analyses the making of the Copenhagen Declaration; the most important outcome of the Danish chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Molbæk-Steensig agrees with most commentators that the declaration does not reflect the Danish government’s “strong discourse of sovereignty and democratic deficit in the Danish debate“. We certainly agree on this point, but we cannot agree with Molbæk-Steensig when she claims that we – Denmark’s national human rights institution – played a passive, or even negative, role during the making of the declaration. We especially disagree when Molbæk-Steensig implies that we somehow legitimise a far-right narrative designed to limit the system of human rights protection in Europe or subscribe to a reductionist concept of democracy. Continue reading >>
0
03 May 2018
Verweisung Asylsuchender auf Ghettos in Drittstaaten?
Eine neue Idee bei der Reform des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Asylsystems ist das Konzept des territorialen Teilschutzes: Um Asylsuchende auf außereuropäische Schutzstaaten verweisen zu können, soll es ausreichen, wenn die dazu nötigen Bedingungen nur in einem Teilgebiet des Territoriums erfüllt sind. Demnach wäre es etwa möglich, Schutzsuchende zwangsweise einem instabilen Drittstaat zuzuordnen, in dem eine Zone von der Größe eines Flüchtlingslagers unter Kontrolle gebracht wurde, und die Schutzsuchenden in dieser Zone subsistenzgesichert zu ghettoisieren. Continue reading >>
02 May 2018
Corporate Liability for Extraterritorial Human Rights Violations – the US in Retreat?
Last week, in Jesner v. Arab Bank, the United States Supreme Court decided that foreign corporations cannot be sued in federal court for human rights violations that occurred outside the US and have no substantial link to the US. The decision is the latest piece of an ongoing debate around the question: just how far can the US meddle in affairs of other countries? More pragmatically, it makes international human rights litigation - a successful counterpart to diplomatic intervention in the past - much more difficult today. Continue reading >>
0
Der Rechtsbruch-Mythos und wie man ihn widerlegt
Bis heute hält sich hartnäckig die Meinung, dass eine „illegale Masseneinwanderung“ nach Deutschland stattfinde und an den Grenzen die „rechtsstaatliche Ordnung“ zusammengebrochen sei. Nun dürfte die Behauptung vom fortwährenden Rechtsbruch, wie ich im Tagesspiegel schrieb, vorrangig das strategische Ziel verfolgen, die Politik generell zu delegitimieren und einem sachlichen Streit auch dadurch auszuweichen, dass man die Systemfrage stellt. Bei dieser generellen Feststellung könnte man es bewenden lassen und Reaktionen wie diejenige von Thilo Sarrazin über „Professor Unfug“ den diskursiven Echokammern des politischen Darknet überlassen. Dennoch sollen nachfolgend die zentralen rechtlichen Aussagen des Tagesspiegel-Beitrags näher erläutert werden Continue reading >>
01 May 2018
Has Parliament Taken Charge of Brexit?
The UK House of Lords has adopted amendments to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill that would make the conclusion of a withdrawal agreement contingent on parliamentary approval. It is not at all clear which, if any, of the Lords amendments will survive in the House of Commons, and we may not find out for a while. It may be premature to conclude that Parliament is now fully in charge of the Brexit process. What the amendments show, however, is that Parliament can assert control if it chooses to do so. Continue reading >>
0
Warum der Stadionverbots-Beschluss weit mehr ist als nur Common Sense
Mit Beschluss v. 11. April 2018 hat der Erste Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts entschieden, dass ein bundesweit gültiges Stadionverbot eine spezifische Konstellation ist, in der sich aus Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG gleichheitsrechtliche Anforderungen für das Verhältnis zwischen Privaten ergeben. Die Ausstrahlungswirkung des Gleichbehandlungsgebots auf privatrechtliche Rechtsbeziehungen begründet zwei Pflichten privater Akteure. Ist der Beschluss, wie Matthias Ruffert schreibt, lediglich eine zutreffende Einzelfallentscheidung? Warum aber hat der Senat darüber entschieden? Und warum hat er sich dafür mehr als acht Jahre lang Zeit genommen? Diese Faktoren passen nicht so recht zur These einer common sense-Entscheidung. Ich plädiere mit vier Argumenten dafür, der Entscheidung eine größere Bedeutung zuzuschreiben. Continue reading >>
30 April 2018
Common sense statt strikte Dogmatik? Zutreffendes aus Karlsruhe zu Stadionverboten
Gibt es ein Grundrecht gegen willkürliche Stadionverbote? Ist ein übermächtiger Profifußballverein einfach nur ein Grundrechtsträger, der von seinem Recht auf Privatautonomie Gebrauch macht? Die Antwort des Bundesverfassungsgerichts auf diese Fragen ist überzeugend. Continue reading >>
28 April 2018
(Not) Striking Down Surrogate Motherhood in Portugal
Last Tuesday, the Portuguese Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional several provisions of the regime on surrogacy, as well as the prohibition to disclose the identity of gamete donors and surrogate mothers. The most striking aspect of this decision, however, is not what the PCC ruled unconstitutional but rather what it expressly accepted as being constitutionally valid. The clear messages sent by the PCC to the legislature show a careful self-repositioning of the Court in its role as a constitutional interpreter in a democracy. Continue reading >>
0
27 April 2018
Ein Recht auf Rehabilitation für Folteropfer oder: Wenn der EuGH die Flüchtlingseigenschaft vergisst
Schwer kranke Drittstaatsangehörige erhalten nur dann Schutz vor Abschiebung, wenn sie mangels medizinischer Behandlung im Heimatstaat eines qualvollen Todes sterben würden. Diese Linie hat der EGMR mittlerweile zwar etwas gelockert, aber subsidiären Schutz gibt es auf dieser Basis jedenfalls nicht. Jetzt hat der EuGH seine Rechtsprechung aktualisiert und für Folteropfer, die an schweren psychischen Folgeschäden leiden und in ihrem Heimatstaat keine adäquate Behandlung erhalten können, die Anforderungen an die Verfügbarkeit medizinischer Behandlung im Herkunftsstaat herabgesetzt. Doch so richtig glücklich macht auch dieses Urteil nicht. Continue reading >>
26 April 2018
Something Rotten in the State of Denmark?
The final version of the Copenhagen Declaration has turned out to be a lot less dramatic than the original draft led many observers to believe. This leaves several questions of why. Why did Denmark, traditionally a frontrunner country, create a draft declaration so regressive it gave rise to harsh critiques from the Council of Europe Assembly, from academia and from civil society? Why was the Danish Minister of Justice glossing over the content of the declaration? Why has the Danish Institute of Human Rights been so relatively quiet throughout the whole debacle? Continue reading >>
25 April 2018
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence the European Way
Will 10 April 2018 be remembered by many as the day of Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony before the US Senate? The hearing was covered by the media in all aspects down to the tie he was wearing. But that was not the only important event taking place on that day, and maybe not even the most important one: I am talking about the Declaration on Cooperation in Artificial Intelligence, signed on the same day but hardly noticed. And yet its impact in the long term might exceed that of the current scandal about Facebook and Cambridge Analytica by far. Continue reading >>
0
24 April 2018
The Draft Amendments to the Serbian Constitution: Populism before Judicial Independence
Serbia is currently abuzz with draft constitutional amendments that should enhance judicial independence and move the country one step closer to EU accession. On 12 April 2018, the Serbian Government adopted the draft amendments and sent them to the Venice Commission. However, while at present the political influence on the judiciary comes from the political institutions, in the future this influence will come from the ruling majority. Continue reading >>
0
Gerrymandering and Judicial Review in Malaysia
On 28 March, the Malaysian Parliament passed new electoral maps. The re-delineated boundaries create an imbalance in constituencies, prompting allegations of mal-apportionment and gerrymandering. They remain largely unchallenged, not only through ouster clauses in particularized elections legislation, but also through the unwillingness of the judiciary to recognize the importance of the constitutional question relating to fair and equitable electoral management. Continue reading >>
23 April 2018
What’s (still) Wrong with Glyphosate? On Pesticides, Public Trust and Parliamentary Scrutiny
The Glyphosate saga that had been troubling farmers, regulators, activists and corporations for almost seven years, finally came to an end with the renewal of the authorization for the infamously notorious pesticide in December 2017. Or did it? Reacting to the widespread institutional and societal concern generated by the uncertainty over Glyphosate’s safety, the European Parliament has set up a special committee on the authorization procedure for pesticides, which held its first working meeting in Brussels on April 12th, 2018. With this, the first renewal of Glyphosate’s authorization became a major case of politicization of science in the European Union. Continue reading >>
0